Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 15,713
- 27,670
- 2,430
Dismissing Vote Fraud as A Non-Issue Is Getting Harder
Di Leo: Dismissing Vote Fraud as a Non-Issue is Getting Harder
Di Leo: Dismissing Vote Fraud as a Non-Issue is Getting Harder - Illinois Review
www.illinoisreview.com
Depending on who you ask, vote fraud is dismissed as something that never happened, or used to happen but doesn’t happen anymore, or happens, but not in numbers significant enough to change an election, so who cares?
I’ve always been particularly irritated by that last one, having had two good friends – members of a state legislature and a county board – win or lose elections by a single vote over the years (Penny Pullen was the Illinois State Rep, and the late Donald Conn was the Ogle County Board Member).
Personally, I’ve always known that vote fraud is real. One day, about 35 years ago now, a friend and I helped out in the city of Chicago, serving as Republican election judges in one of two polling places located in a north side nursing home. Our precinct was relatively clean, consisting of the professionals who lived in the neighboring apartment buildings. The precinct voting across the hall, however, constituted the almost uniformly incapacitated residents of the nursing home. Over the course of the day, seeing their election judges holding their hands for them and casting their votes without instruction or even awareness, it became evident that these poor residents had no idea where they were or for whom they were voting.
~Snip~
It's extremely difficult to find all the vote fraud, and harder still to prosecute and convict for it all.
But it’s easy to prevent it. Just a few simple measures would stop the vast majority of vote fraud across the country.
It is telling, then, isn’t it, that the Democratic Party is so obstinate, insisting that vote fraud is minimal, but fighting tooth and nail against any of the simple measures that might prevent it.
This alone should tell us all we need to know, not only about how real it is, but also about how dependent the Democratic Party really is on these illegal votes to push them over the top and keep up the pretense of being a nationally popular party.
Commentary:
Voter fraud has been going on for a LONG time, generally perpetrated and in favor of Democrat Candidates. The age of computers has simply made it easier to commit fraud on a more massive (81 Million?) scale.
As long as (Democrat) politicians are immoral and corrupt, there will be vote fraud.
Millions of ballots being mailed out unsolicited and floating around without any tracking of the chain of custody. This is no way to get an accurate election results. People cannot have confidence in the outcome. It could 95% accurate, but the 5% is more than enough to swing a close election even if *zero* organized fraud occurred. And we know with ballot harvesting, it was not zero.
At the present time in certain state and counties, you could have Mother Theresa as a witness to voter fraud and the perpetrator would probably walk (heck, case in point, they can’t even put Jussie Smollett in the clink.
Unfortunately, as long as States depend on computer balloting and mail in and voter harvesting, voter fraud will prevail in U.S. elections.
Last edited:
