Buden authorized use if military force only if determined to be necessary. His words in February 2002. indicate that he did not support starting the invasion prior to the inspectors finishing their work. So because Bush promised he would support the peaceful effort without a deadline Biden clearly stated that he did not support an invasion prior to the summer because if the immense task of keeping order in Muslim nation broken by war.
Biden was it covering his ass he was right. Bush invaded without a broad coalition and had no real plans and resources for dealing with the aftermath of regime change.
And half a million Iraqis died. And you support the incompetence and quagmire that Biden warned in advance was coming
You asked me why I thought that Biden's statement might not have been in good faith. I explained.
Your response barely touched upon the point.
YOu spent most of your time restating your core position. As though you are nothing but a lefty spam bot.
That shows that your previous question, was not in good faith.
Most of your discussion is like that. YOu are not really engaged in real dialog. My answers rarely serious matter to you. YOur questions are mostly accusations or just spamming your points.
YOu are just here to spread hate and division.
I could teach you to spread your ideal of Peace or at least being far more conservative in the use of War as policy, in TWO WORDS.
But, you are not interesting in that. THe fact that avoiding ONE WAR, could save hundreds of thousands of lives, even "the children" that you pretend to care so much about..
You don't care enough to ask. You would rather spam propaganda like a stupid bot.