Did you know

Huey

Silver Member
Mar 6, 2012
1,577
117
95
Earth
The Seven Black Presidents Before Barack Obama
December 1, 2008

Were There Black US Presidents before? The people thought that Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States. Wrong.

1. John Hanson (a Moor) was actually the 1st President of the United States, he served from 1781 – 1782 and he was black. The new country was actually formed on March 1, 1781 with the adoption of The Articles of Confederation. This document was actually proposed on June 11, 1776, but not agreed upon by Congress until November 15, 1777. Maryland refused to sign this document until Virginia and New York ceded their western lands (Maryland was afraid that these states would gain too much power in the new government from such large amounts of land).

Once the signing took place in 1781, a President was needed to run the country. John Hanson was chosen unanimously by Congress (which included George Washington). In fact, all the other potential candidates refused to run against him, as he was a major player in the revolution and an extremely influential member of Congress.

As President, Hanson ordered all foreign troops off American soil, as well as removal of all foreign flags. He established the Great Seal of the United States, which all Presidents since have been required to use on all Official Documents. He declared that the 4th Thursday of every November to be Thanksgiving Day, which is still true today. Even though elected, one variable that was never thought through was that America was not going to accept a Black President during the heart of the enslavement period. Enter George Washington.

2. Thomas Jefferson was the 3rd President of the United States, he served from 1801 – 1809 and he was black. His mother a half-breed Indian squaw and his father a mulatto (half white and half black) from Virginia. He fathered numerous children with Sally Hemmings, a mulatto slave with whom he lived with in Europe.

3. Andrew Jackson was the 7th President of the United States. He served from 1829 – 1837 and he was black. His mother was a white woman from Ireland who had Andrew Jackson with a black man. His father’s other children (Andrew Jackson’s stepbrother) was sold into slavery.

4. Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States, he served from 1861 – 1865 and he was black. His mother was from an Ethiopian Tribe and his father was an African American. It was told that his father was Thomas Lincoln, a man to cover the truth, but he was sterile from childhood mumps and was later castrated, making it impossible for him to have been his father. Lincoln’s nickname “Abraham Africa-nus the First.”

5. Warren Harding was the 28th President of the United States, he served from 1921 – 1923 and he was black. Harding never denied his ancestry. When Republican leaders called on Harding to deny his “Negro” history, he said, “How should I know whether or not one of my ancestors might have jumped the fence?”

6. Calvin Coolidge was the 29th President of the United States, he served from 1923 – 1929 and he was black. He proudly admitted that his mother was dark but claimed it was because of a mixed Indian ancestry. His mother’s maiden name was “Moor.” In Europe the name “Moor” was given to all Black people just as in America the name “Negro” was used.

7. Dwight E. Eisenhower was the 33rd President of the United States, he served from 1953 – 1961 and he was black. His mother, Ida Elizabeth Stover Eisenhower, an anti-war advocate, was half black.

So, America has survived and thrived through our first Seven Black Presidents and we will survive and THRIVE through the election of this one!
They made it awfully hard for a Black man to succeed.
 
Interesting post. It would indeed be a good thing if this information is factual. Maybe it could change the conversations Americans have regarding race.However, the John Hanson you mention here is not the same John Hanson of which you are thinking. I would like to see more information regarding this post though.

John Hanson Liberia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Where did you get the above information from, Huey? I would like to confirm it before I share this information with others.

I'm glad we have President Obama for now. Wish he had gotten more cooperation in working towards important issues that need to progress in this country.
 
Huey. To my knowledge and research the John Hanson you have listed was not Black. That guy was born later in the 1800's. The guy you have listed was definitely white.
 
African-American heritage of United States presidents - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The academic consensus of historians does not accept the claims that any other President had any recent African ancestry, and rejects most of those claims.

This consensus includes historians of all races, including those who would not benefit either way from acknowledging or refuting the claims.

"These claims have been made by the historian William Estabrook Chancellor, amateur historian J. A. Rogers, ophthalmologist Dr. Leroy William Vaughn,[1] and Dr. Auset BaKhufu. All but Chancellor base their theories chiefly on the work of J. A. Rogers, who apparently self-published a pamphlet in 1965 claiming African ancestry of five presidents.[2] Vaughn's and BaKhufu's books appear to have been self-published.[3]

Historians' and biographers' studies of these presidents have not supported such claims, nor have the claims above been peer-reviewed.[4] They are generally ignored by scholars. They repeat each other's material and are classified as "rumormongers and amateur historians."[5] Vaughn and BaKhufu have added little substantive research to their claims, although there has been extensive new documentation of race relations by others in the decades since Rogers published his pamphlet."


I was hoping the information Huey posted might be true, but there is not enough substantial support by the full spectrum of accredited historians to support the claims. It is well-known that European-American historians have altered the history books many times to fit their agenda (revisionist history). However, creating new falsehoods to counter the European-American propaganda does not help to find the truth.

It is very important when making such claims that the information be factual and not further propaganda, or it further perpetuates untruth and revises an already revised history that isn't true. That gets us nowhere.

I hope that if it is true, more historians of all races and nationalities can affirm the factual nature of the claims.
 
African-American heritage of United States presidents - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The academic consensus of historians does not accept the claims that any other President had any recent African ancestry, and rejects most of those claims.

This consensus includes historians of all races, including those who would not benefit either way from acknowledging or refuting the claims.

"These claims have been made by the historian William Estabrook Chancellor, amateur historian J. A. Rogers, ophthalmologist Dr. Leroy William Vaughn,[1] and Dr. Auset BaKhufu. All but Chancellor base their theories chiefly on the work of J. A. Rogers, who apparently self-published a pamphlet in 1965 claiming African ancestry of five presidents.[2] Vaughn's and BaKhufu's books appear to have been self-published.[3]

Historians' and biographers' studies of these presidents have not supported such claims, nor have the claims above been peer-reviewed.[4] They are generally ignored by scholars. They repeat each other's material and are classified as "rumormongers and amateur historians."[5] Vaughn and BaKhufu have added little substantive research to their claims, although there has been extensive new documentation of race relations by others in the decades since Rogers published his pamphlet."


I was hoping the information Huey posted might be true, but there is not enough substantial support by the full spectrum of accredited historians to support the claims. It is well-known that European-American historians have altered the history books many times to fit their agenda (revisionist history). However, creating new falsehoods to counter the European-American propaganda does not help to find the truth.

It is very important when making such claims that the information be factual and not further propaganda, or it further perpetuates untruth and revises an already revised history that isn't true. That gets us nowhere.

I hope that if it is true, more historians of all races and nationalities can affirm the factual nature of the claims.
Thats not saying much. White historians are always fucking up history so whatever consensus is there really doesnt matter.
 
These are not just White folks, Asclep... historians with no vested interests, as well as Black historians, also do not acknowledge these claims... that does say a lot.

I wish the information were true. That could change a lot of things regarding race perception. Its just not good to perpetuate the information if it is not factual.
 
These are not just White folks, Asclep... historians with no vested interests, as well as Black historians, also do not acknowledge these claims... that does say a lot.

I wish the information were true. That could change a lot of things regarding race perception. Its just not good to perpetuate the information if it is not factual.
What Black historians are agreeing Eisenhower's mother was not Black?

6a00e55127ad3588330120a558abaa970b-pi


10701_134583933458.jpg
 
This is more what I was hoping for Asclep... thank you.

Its good to have evidence to support the claims. This makes me happy.

Would you be willing to help affirm any of the other claims for us?

She actually looks a lot like my grandmother on my dad's side. My great-grandfather on that side of the family claimed himself as an 'orphan' so we have little knowledge of ancestry beyond that, although we think the possibility of Jewish heritage is there as well.

I've had lots of black folks ask if I have some black in me even though I'm about as white as a person can get without being albino. I'm guessing its because of my walk and my communication style. If I could affirm that I am black at all, I would likely get less negativity at my HBCU for my skin tone. I might would need to carry a card to prove it though.
 
Last edited:
This is more what I was hoping for Asclep... thank you.

Its good to have evidence to support the claims. This makes me happy.

Would you be willing to help affirm any of the other claims for us?

She actually looks a lot like my grandmother on my dad's side. My great-grandfather on that side of the family claimed himself as an 'orphan' so we have little knowledge of ancestry beyond that, although we think the possibility of Jewish heritage is there as well.

I've had lots of black folks ask if I have some black in me even though I'm about as white as a person can get without being albino. I'm guessing its because of my walk and my communication style. If I could affirm that I am black at all, I would likely get less negativity at my HBCU for my skin tone. I might would need to carry a card to prove it though.


what type of flack?

what HBCU?

if you don't answer the last question, I'll understand it's not a dodge.
 
This is more what I was hoping for Asclep... thank you.

Its good to have evidence to support the claims. This makes me happy.

Would you be willing to help affirm any of the other claims for us?

She actually looks a lot like my grandmother on my dad's side. My great-grandfather on that side of the family claimed himself as an 'orphan' so we have little knowledge of ancestry beyond that, although we think the possibility of Jewish heritage is there as well.

I've had lots of black folks ask if I have some black in me even though I'm about as white as a person can get without being albino. I'm guessing its because of my walk and my communication style. If I could affirm that I am black at all, I would likely get less negativity at my HBCU for my skin tone. I might would need to carry a card to prove it though.
You could get a DNA test to confirm that. It has solved quite a few mysteries in our family. There are some more famous cases like the Melungeons that swore they had no African blood but DNA proved this to be a falsehood.

Melungeon DNA Study Reveals Ancestry Upsets A Whole Lot Of People

"Genetic evidence shows that the families historically called Melungeons are the offspring of sub-Saharan African men and white women of northern or central European origin.".
 
Google it and you will get your answers,I'm not here to do your work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top