Did Sirhan Sirhan really shoot RFK. RFK jr. says no.

LaDairis

Gold Member
May 9, 2019
5,252
1,364
140


"Kennedy, who was a teen at the time of the murder, pointed to an autopsy report indicating the senator had been shot from behind when Sirhan had been standing in front of Kennedy."


That's good....

Almost as good as San Diego police who said the deceased was charging them with a knife, nevermind all of his gunshot wounds are in his back....

And Michael Brown, on the ground on his knees and the officer shot him in the back, nevermind all of Brown's wounds were in the FRONT....




"Paul Schrade, a former Kennedy aide who was one of several bystanders wounded in the shooting, also said Friday that he believed Sirhan was innocent."


There is your EYEWITNESS....



"Sirhan was standing in front of Kennedy at the time of the shooting, but an autopsy report found Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind. Over the years new evidence reportedly shows as many as 13 shots were fired that night.

But Sirhan's gun held only eight bullets. That's one reason why many now question Sirhan's guilt – including Robert Kennedy Jr.

"There were too many bullets. You can't fire 13 shots out of an eight-shot gun," RFK Jr told the Post."





There should be a new investigation, with nobody Zionist allowed to participate....
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Michael Brown was running at the officer, his wounds were in the front, as expected.



Those rioting were under the impression Brown was on his knees when shot from behind. The source of that lie was the other kid involved in the shoplifting minutes earlier.

That liar should be in prison for inciting riot, but because he is a black criminal, he got affirmative action preferential treatment...
 


"Kennedy, who was a teen at the time of the murder, pointed to an autopsy report indicating the senator had been shot from behind when Sirhan had been standing in front of Kennedy."


That's good....

Almost as good as San Diego police who said the deceased was charging them with a knife, nevermind all of his gunshot wounds are in his back....

And Michael Brown, on the ground on his knees and the officer shot him in the back, nevermind all of Brown's wounds were in the FRONT....




"Paul Schrade, a former Kennedy aide who was one of several bystanders wounded in the shooting, also said Friday that he believed Sirhan was innocent."


There is your EYEWITNESS....



"Sirhan was standing in front of Kennedy at the time of the shooting, but an autopsy report found Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind. Over the years new evidence reportedly shows as many as 13 shots were fired that night.

But Sirhan's gun held only eight bullets. That's one reason why many now question Sirhan's guilt – including Robert Kennedy Jr.

"There were too many bullets. You can't fire 13 shots out of an eight-shot gun," RFK Jr told the Post."





There should be a new investigation, with nobody Zionist allowed to participate....
Of course Sirhan didn’t kill Booby. Just as Oswald didn’t kill JFK.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Of course Sirhan didn’t kill Booby. Just as Oswald didn’t kill JFK.



If Oswald had taken 100 shots at a stationary limo from the 7th floor, he would have been lucky to hit the back passenger once.

JFK, MLK, and RFK. All three have the same smell of zionist treason against America, and the same zionist fucks still lying about it...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9


"Three months ago, Dexter Scott King declared that he and his family believed that James Earl Ray was not guilty of the murder of his father, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Tonight, in a televised interview, Mr. King asserted that President Lyndon B. Johnson must have been part of a military and governmental conspiracy to kill Dr. King."






Jackie O same thing = LBJ did it




"the KGB "was in possession of data purporting to indicate LBJ was responsible""





Every time we check, another "eyewitness" debunks the official lies.... The Soviets were spying on us.
 


"Kennedy, who was a teen at the time of the murder, pointed to an autopsy report indicating the senator had been shot from behind when Sirhan had been standing in front of Kennedy."


That's good....

Almost as good as San Diego police who said the deceased was charging them with a knife, nevermind all of his gunshot wounds are in his back....

And Michael Brown, on the ground on his knees and the officer shot him in the back, nevermind all of Brown's wounds were in the FRONT....




"Paul Schrade, a former Kennedy aide who was one of several bystanders wounded in the shooting, also said Friday that he believed Sirhan was innocent."


There is your EYEWITNESS....



"Sirhan was standing in front of Kennedy at the time of the shooting, but an autopsy report found Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind. Over the years new evidence reportedly shows as many as 13 shots were fired that night.

But Sirhan's gun held only eight bullets. That's one reason why many now question Sirhan's guilt – including Robert Kennedy Jr.

"There were too many bullets. You can't fire 13 shots out of an eight-shot gun," RFK Jr told the Post."





There should be a new investigation, with nobody Zionist allowed to participate....
Interesting information. Thanks for the post. MANY people wanted the Kennedy brothers dead, and they got their wish. Some say Joseph Kennedy, Sr. was cursed. I believe this is the case.
 
While we're on the subject...

According to a Documentary I saw about Joe Kennedy Jr.'s death:

Kennedy's plane blew up when his copilot armed the explosives that were loaded on the plane.

Kennedy's mission was to direct the plane at a Nazi bunker, then bailout. The plane, loaded with explosives, were supposed to explode on impact.

And THERE'S THE FLAW IN THE STORY.

If the explosives were supposed to explode on impact, they WOULD NOT HAVE NEEDED TO BE ARMED!!!!

They should have been the type of explosives that would explode on impact...no arming, fuse or timer mechanism needed.

It's apparent that the "arming mechanism" was designed to ignite the explosives immediately. There would be no other purpose for it.

This implies that the murders of Joe Kennedy, JFK, RFK, and possibly MLK were all done by British Conservatives who did not want any Irish Catholic for President of the USA. They're goal has been to take control of the USA post WWII and to use the USA as the strong arm of conservative British policy.

By measure of U.S. foreign policy since 1950, they have succeeded.
 
While we're on the subject...

According to a Documentary I saw about Joe Kennedy Jr.'s death:

Kennedy's plane blew up when his copilot armed the explosives that were loaded on the plane.

Kennedy's mission was to direct the plane at a Nazi bunker, then bailout. The plane, loaded with explosives, were supposed to explode on impact.

And THERE'S THE FLAW IN THE STORY.

If the explosives were supposed to explode on impact, they WOULD NOT HAVE NEEDED TO BE ARMED!!!!

They should have been the type of explosives that would explode on impact...no arming, fuse or timer mechanism needed.

It's apparent that the "arming mechanism" was designed to ignite the explosives immediately. There would be no other purpose for it.

This implies that the murders of Joe Kennedy, JFK, RFK, and possibly MLK were all done by British Conservatives who did not want any Irish Catholic for President of the USA. They're goal has been to take control of the USA post WWII and to use the USA as the strong arm of conservative British policy.

By measure of U.S. foreign policy since 1950, they have succeeded.
Interesting theory, thanks.
 
RFK Jr.'s opinion on any subject, whether you are on his side of the argument or not should be ignored.
 
Those rioting were under the impression Brown was on his knees when shot from behind. The source of that lie was the other kid involved in the shoplifting minutes earlier.

That liar should be in prison for inciting riot, but because he is a black criminal, he got affirmative action preferential treatment...
Th orange clown on a golf cart incited a riot on 1/6, so when are you going to call for his prosecution?

The forced into retirement white ex game show host fake president who now rides a golf cart to oblivion is the one getting preferential treatment.
 
Interesting theory, thanks.
Interesting theory, thanks.
While we're on the subject...

According to a Documentary I saw about Joe Kennedy Jr.'s death:

Kennedy's plane blew up when his copilot armed the explosives that were loaded on the plane.

Kennedy's mission was to direct the plane at a Nazi bunker, then bailout. The plane, loaded with explosives, were supposed to explode on impact.

And THERE'S THE FLAW IN THE STORY.

If the explosives were supposed to explode on impact, they WOULD NOT HAVE NEEDED TO BE ARMED!!!!

They should have been the type of explosives that would explode on impact...no arming, fuse or timer mechanism needed.

It's apparent that the "arming mechanism" was designed to ignite the explosives immediately. There would be no other purpose for it.

This implies that the murders of Joe Kennedy, JFK, RFK, and possibly MLK were all done by British Conservatives who did not want any Irish Catholic for President of the USA. They're goal has been to take control of the USA post WWII and to use the USA as the strong arm of conservative British policy.

By measure of U.S. foreign policy since 1950, they have succeeded.
British conservatives offed Joe Kennedy, JFK, RFK & MLK to prevent an Irish Catholic from being elected POTUS?

Keep em coming Clown, we want to laugh.
 

Forum List

Back
Top