Did Pretti act lawfully?

They were physically removing a loud mouthed nasty ***** who did not follow legal orders to keep her fat ass out of a legal enforcement action. She’s lucky all she got was a push.

Watch the videos again. Protesters had exited the area where the DHS agents were and then the agents crossed the street to initiate violence.

WW
 
Sealion someone else, they've been all over the internet and posted on this board. You've seen them don't waste our time.

WW
So, you have no proof. Figures. She had no business being there in the first place. She was in the middle of the street where the police action was taking place. The rioters are told to obstruct and distract ICE agents. ICE was after a criminal, Signal told them where the ICE action was taking place that is why they were there, to distract, blow whistles and obstruct.
 


Pretti did not meet the standard for deadly force. He must be an imminent ( going to happen this moment) threat for serious bodily injury or death. He was disarmed and restrained by 4 agents when shot.
Watch a professional analysis.
In contrast the Goode shooting was lawful

This guy in the video is an idiot and misses the entire point of how and why Pretti is complicit in his own shooting.
 
This guy in the video is an idiot and misses the entire point of how and why Pretti is complicit in his own shooting.
No he doesnt Pretti never met the legal standard for use of deadly force. His poor judgment doesnt excuse the agents wrongful use of deadly force. There must be an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death. Imminent means must happen right now this second.
Pretti was blinded by OC spray disarmed and surrounded by 4 agents. There is no imminent threat. He should have been restrained cuffed and arrested.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom