Did one of the left wing judges leak Roe versus Wade? Was the leak made to affect the midterms?

[Lesh]

Oh, and the public putting pressure on them to vote to keep Roe is not a benefit to pro-choicers?

The pressure put on them was to produce the opposite result. And it worked

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The pressure put on them was to produce the opposite result. And it worked

I really need to hear this explanation. Please walk me through the dynamics of that. Somebody on the pro-life side leaked information that would have the public protest against it, and that made judges side against them? How does that work exactly?

 

[DBA]

Christians have shown that they are just as willing to kill indiscriminately as Muslims and Christians use drugs, duh.

Do tell and provide examples in recent history how killing in the name of Christianity rivals killing in the name of Islam.

 

[skews13]

Was is it one of the non-Christian judges that leaked the decision to overturn roe versus wade? If it was I can’t imagine how those judges or the judge can sleep at night.

So what was it ? it was either a judge or one of the clerks ….those were the only people in the room right?

I’m not happy with the Supreme Court right now. It feels like it was one of the non-Christian judges the far left judges who must’ve done this. They think that they’re God or something….? these people who claim to be authority figures who claim to be judges and who think that they have a right to uphold abortions are only judges a name. Certainly not in the eyes of any good moral system …they’re not a judge that’s for sure.

The second part of the post is about the American public. Did the Republicans lose the Senate because of the leak about roe versus wade? Because if that’s the case that means our countries population has a problem and it means that our country‘s population or at least too much of them have been brainwashed by the capitalistic materialistic media that tells us don’t even care about Christianity stop caring about Christmas…. just go and do drugs all the time. we’re legalizing marijuana all over America… That’s what happens when people lose Christian values they turn to drugs, they turn to degradation, they turn to pornography, they turn to just sitting at home all the time. They turn to not being a man not going out meeting women. Look at the divorce rate in America it’s very high. Young people are not going out and meeting other people these are serious problems and we have a government we even have Democrats and Republicans who oppose family values and who support abortion.

What kind of life is that ?is that what the far left wants for young Americans…. that’s the far left want young people to be pro abortion, anti-American, pro reparations, anti-police….. Well it ain’t gonna happen because more and more Americans are beginning to see the light we’re going back to traditional values and we’re gonna make this country something to be proud of once again.

No Alito dud, to cover his own corruption. Virginia Thomas aided and abbeted him.

Can you imagine how life is going to be for conservatives, when the court us finally freed from right wing corruption?

You should probably start, because thats going to happen n the not so distant future.

 

[DBA]

No Alito dud, to cover his own corruption. Virginia Thomas aided and abbeted him.

Can you imagine how life is going to be for conservatives, when the court us finally freed from right wing corruption?

You should probably start, because thats going to happen n the not so distant future.

Without Conservative justices, the SC would be nothing but a rubber stamp for the corrupt Democratic Party. All the Democratic justices are sheep, just like the rest of those voting for Democrats.

 

[Lesh]

I really need to hear this explanation. Please walk me through the dynamics of that. Somebody on the pro-life side leaked information that would have the public protest against it, and that made judges side against them? How does that work exactly?

Someone on the anti-abortion side leaked information in order to make sure that any wavering Justices would vote to overturn Roe or face the attack of the anti-abortion crazies.

As far as pro-choice folks...the leak and the actual vote had the same effect. The leak served no purpose for them.

It was Ginni

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Someone on the anti-abortion side leaked information in order to make sure that any wavering Justices would vote to overturn Roe or face the attack of the anti-abortion crazies.

As far as pro-choice folks...the leak and the actual vote had the same effect. The leak served no purpose for them.

It was Ginni

But they had no idea that would be the outcome. Whoever it was that leaked it was a pro-choice person to rile up the troops, even to the point one of them planned an assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh. This is exactly what the leaker had in mind which is why they did it. It was a leftist no doubt.

 

[DBA]

Someone on the anti-abortion side leaked information in order to make sure that any wavering Justices would vote to overturn Roe or face the attack of the anti-abortion crazies.

Or someone on the pro-abortion side leaked information in order to spur protests by the pro-abortion lunatics and have them intimidate justices(and threaten harm) in hopes to have them change their opinion before the actual vote. That is the more likely scenario given that that is actually what happened, not to mention the immense number of violent nut jobs that support the left-wing.(see rioting)

 

[Lesh]

But they had no idea that would be the outcome. Whoever it was that leaked it was a pro-choice person to rile up the troops, even to the point one of them planned an assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh. This is exactly what the leaker had in mind which is why they did it. It was a leftist no doubt.

Nope. There was no possibility of forcing enough votes to retain Roe. The leak was a leash Ginni or Alito used on any wavering "conservatives"

 

[Lesh]

Or someone on the pro-abortion side leaked information in order to spur protests by the pro-abortion lunatics and have them intimidate justices(and threaten harm) in hopes to have them change their opinion before the actual vote. That is the more likely scenario given that that is actually what happened, not to mention the immense number of violent nut jobs that support the left-wing.(see rioting)

The vote itself had the effect you claim the leak was supposed to provide.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nope. There was no possibility of forcing enough votes to retain Roe. The leak was a leash Ginni or Alito used on any wavering "conservatives"

Of course there was a possibility because your AG refused to enforce the law and they knew he would. Therefore the anti Roe judges were under a threat to change their vote.

 

[DBA]

The vote itself had the effect you claim the leak was supposed to provide.

The leak was of the draft opinion, not the actual vote. Justices can't change their vote after the vote, but their opinion can change prior to the vote. That was the point of the leak...to give the anti-abortion nuts the chance to attempt to change the actual vote.

 

[Lesh]

Justices can't change their vote after the vote, but their opinion can change prior to the vote. That was the point of the leak

And the leak was the leash to keep the anti-Roe votes in place

 

[DBA]

And the leak was the leash to keep the anti-Roe votes in place

How would it keep them in place? Do you think they wouldn't have changed their vote so it wouldn't look like they were intimidated? What indication was there they they were wavering in the first place? The more likely scenario is that it was virtually a done deal and the Democrats sicked their mob squad on the justices in an attempt to threaten them into changing their votes.

 

[Lesh]

How would it keep them in place? Do you think they wouldn't have changed their vote so it wouldn't look like they were intimidated? What indication was there they they were wavering in the first place? The more likely scenario is that it was virtually a done deal and the Democrats sicked their mob squad on the justices in an attempt to threaten them into changing their votes.

Roberts was certainly wavering...and being Chief Justice...others could follow

Ginni made sure that didn't happen

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The leak was of the draft opinion, not the actual vote. Justices can't change their vote after the vote, but their opinion can change prior to the vote. That was the point of the leak...to give the anti-abortion nuts the chance to attempt to change the actual vote.

And leaking it ensures those on the fence do not change their vote so they do not give the impression of giving in to the mob

 

[Lesh]

It was a sober, even humble Roberts who wrote – alone – as he separated himself both from the conservatives who dissolved a constitutional guarantee and from the liberal dissenters who expressed sorrow for American women and warned of further erosions on privacy.

The 67-year-old chief justice, who is finishing his 17th session, confessed to a rare lack of confidence.

“Both the Court’s opinion and the dissent display a relentless freedom from doubt on the legal issue that I cannot share,” he wrote. Referring to the disputed Mississippi law at the heart of the Dobbs case, he added, “I am not sure, for example, that a ban on terminating a pregnancy from the moment of conception must be treated the same under the Constitution as a ban after fifteen weeks.”

Roberts, who has forcefully pushed for conservative outcomes on race and religion, had tried to move incrementally here. He attempted to split the difference, to uphold the disputed Mississippi law that prohibits abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy but to hold off on confronting Roe.

“I would take a more measured course,” he wrote and urging – in vain – some judicial restraint, said, “If it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is necessary not to decide more.”

 

[DBA]

And leaking it ensures those on the fence do not change their vote so they do not give the impression of giving in to the mob

And not leaking it all but ensures that it would be overturned. The pro-abortion folks needed something to change, thus the leak.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And not leaking it all but ensures that it would be overturned.

Unless one or two of the justices that was on the fence changed their mind before the final ruling. Put out the leak and then they would have looked weak for changing.

Both sides had something to gain.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

It was Ginni

You’re such a fucking retard. You have zero indication of this incoherent bullshit you’re spewing being valid.

If anything, it was one of the butthurt leftist radicals on the court sad to see their precious Roe go down in flames as the nonsense it always was, hoping to gin up anger for the election as early as possible and to engender the intimidation tactics we saw spring up immediately.

None of which would be valid if we treated Antifa filth like the terrorists they are.