pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 73,768
- 28,823
- 2,210
The ruling came out well before the elections so releasing the info to affect the elections don't make sense. I have no idea how releasing the info would cause a justice from deciding to not change their vote if they were going to .
If the ruling came out upholding RvW it would have simply made people believe the previous news was simply more fake news.
No, it makes more sense that a justice simply told someone they didn't think would blab but they did.
My guess would be Thomas.
If the ruling came out upholding RvW it would have simply made people believe the previous news was simply more fake news.
No, it makes more sense that a justice simply told someone they didn't think would blab but they did.
My guess would be Thomas.