Did MAGA Rig the election?

[Slade3200]

TikTok can have condensed speeches from Trump and or Harris. It’s like YouTube. So why can’t it be a source for news? You’re still not answering me.

We aren't talking about condensed speeches... We are talking about people pointing and random people melting down and attributing those posts to the sentiment of the masses. You are trying way to hard

 

[ThisIsMe]

You're looking at mediums that sensationalize content for clicks and money. Try going out into your community and interacting with real people. My guess is you will get a much more accurate impression

So you think all these reactions are fake? Then how does that explain that the reactions we see on social media mimic the reactions I hear on lefty radio?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

We aren't talking about condensed speeches... We are talking about people pointing and random people melting down and attributing those posts to the sentiment of the masses. You are trying way to hard

That’s just funny. Like cat videos.

This represents views of the masses

Data

 

[Slade3200]

Bullshit

You started telling me the why when I never asked you to do that to sway the conversation

Yes, I agreed that it was an outlier immediate after you asked and then went into the why... It didn't take me 10 posts to answer your question. I'll always give direct answers. I don't play the dodge game.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So you think all these reactions are fake? Then how does that explain that the reactions we see on social media mimic the reactions I hear on lefty radio?

He isn’t saying “fake” he is saying it’s a minority of people. Most just shrugged and went about their day. He is probably right there. I begrudgingly concede this point.

We need to stop allowing the tiny minority to think that’s how most of America thinks or in this case Democrats. Many just shrugged.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Yes, I agreed that it was an outlier immediate after you asked and then went into the why... It didn't take me 10 posts to answer your question. I'll always give direct answers. I don't play the dodge game.

Then why the long posts? Why not immediately just say, yes?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So was trumps 74M right?

Slade3200 that was how you started. Defensive.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yep. It is. To most logical people it would be an aberration and the outlier official definition allows for aberrations. Youre just being obtuse.


So it is in the official definition so we need to agree to disagree.

The outlier formula indicates what is to be considered an “aberration” and what isn’t. If you’re not quantifying where the threshold is between “aberration” and “not an aberration” then all you’re doing is throwing your feelings around at the data with your subjective claim.

Computationally, no, it’s not a statistical outlier. This isn’t a matter of feelings. This is a fact.

 

[Slade3200]

So you think all these reactions are fake? Then how does that explain that the reactions we see on social media mimic the reactions I hear on lefty radio?

They are a silver of the population. Many are sensationalized, some authentic, but it is a piss poor way to guage real life. It is causing major damage IMO to children who spend a ton of time on these social media sites and think what they see is how life really is. But yes... much of it is fake and over glorified versions of reality.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The outlier formula indicates what is to be considered an “aberration” and what isn’t. If you’re not quantifying where the threshold is between “aberration” and “not an aberration” then all you’re doing is throwing your feelings around at the data with your subjective claim.

Computationally, no, it’s not a statistical outlier. This isn’t a matter of feelings. This is a fact.

11mil with a Z of 1.7 is an aberration to most logical people. You do you.

 

[Slade3200]

Slade3200 that was how you started. Defensive.

Correct, that was how I started. That shows agreement that it was an outlier for Biden and also made the point that it was an outlier for Trump.

 

[XponentialChaos]

11mil with a Z of 1.7 is an aberration to most logical people. You do you.

Right. So based on your feelings.

But according to the actual technical definition of an outlier, it’s not an aberration.

 

[Slade3200]

That’s just funny. Like cat videos.

This represents views of the masses

Data

Im fine with stats and data... much better than random people posting on TIKTOK

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Correct, that was how I started. That shows agreement that it was an outlier for Biden and also made the point that it was an outlier for Trump.

But that wasn’t what I asked. Then you started doubling down and telling me the why when you have no idea why. Trump
will surpass his 2020. No longer an aberration. Harris fell way short. 2028 will be telling

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Right. So based on your feelings.

But according to the actual technical definition of an outlier, it’s not an aberration.

Already posted and according to the tech definition it could be

 

[XponentialChaos]

Already posted and according to the tech definition it could be

No, it isn't. Outlier has formulas associated with it. Numerical values that act as thresholds between what is and isn't an outlier.

You don't get to quantify how you think an outlier should be calculated based on your feelings. That's now how an outlier aberration is numerically calculated.

 

[Slade3200]

But that wasn’t what I asked. Then you started doubling down and telling me the why when you have no idea why. Trump
will surpass his 2020. No longer an aberration. Harris fell way short. 2028 will be telling

You didn't ask anything... You made a statement and I responded:

The 81mil was definitely a statistical anomaly. Can’t argue against that one.

I said so was trumps 74M right? See thats agreement and adding context.

It wasn't a dodge and it didn't take me 10 posts to acknowledge that 2020 was an outlier election. I've been make that point all thread.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No, it isn't. Outlier has formulas associated with it. Numerical values that act as thresholds between what is and isn't an outlier.

You don't get to quantify how you think an outlier should be calculated based on your feelings. That's now how an outlier aberration is numerically calculated.

Already posted that it doesn’t have to. Learn to read

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You didn't ask anything... You made a statement and I responded:


I said so was trumps 74M right? See thats agreement and adding context. It was also a question to you that you dodged for many posts.

It wasn't a dodge and it didn't take me 10 posts to acknowledge that 2020 was an outlier election. I've been make that point all thread.

Not election* because Trump did it again. The Democrats fell sharply. Trump has the cult of personality factor. Biden not really.

So the 81mil is puzzling

 

[XponentialChaos]

Already posted that it doesn’t have to. Learn to read

This isn’t a matter of opinion. This is a fact. An outlier has a specific formula that you’re ignoring and trying to replace with your feelings.