I say that Jesus did know what he was bringing to the world, and he quite explicitly says so. What do you say?
I say Jesus was the ambassador of
faith , which had so
little to do with
organized religion that it exists as a
blasphemy to HIS doctrine, wishes , and sacrifice
~S~
So you believe Jesus was more like Siddhārtha Gautama?
I suppose one could delve into comparisons ding. It begs the old debate of being divine, or simply moved by divinity.....
~S~
That wasn’t where I was going with that.
Siddhārtha Gautama was a Hindu reformist. He believed that it had become fettered. Theology, ritual, authority, grace, mystery and tradition are components of religion. He believed they had become overbalanced. Where the form had replaced the meaning. He didn't reject them. He rejected the imbalance. He was a called the rebel child of Hinduism. He asked his followers, "did I ever teach you that God existed?" They said, "no." He asked them, "did I ever teach you that God didn't exist?" They said, "no." He asked them, "did I teach you the world is eternal?" They said, "no." He asked them, "did I teach you the world isn't eternal?" They said, "no." He then asked them, "what have I taught you?" They said, you have taught us suffering and the end of suffering."
He was a rationalist and a moralist. He taught that people should work out their own salvation with diligence. He was not against Hinduism. He was against the corruption which had entered into Hinduism and wanted to get back to what was important in Hinduism. He believed we crave and cling to impermanent states and things which are incapable of satisfying us. Which is very true. We are free to pursue pleasure, wealth, fame and power but none of those things will satisfy us because we were made for more.
So if I understood your point correctly, you were arguing that Jesus was a reformer of Judaism because he believed as Siddhārtha Gautama believed that the form of faith had become imbalanced.
So I have little doubt that this is true. It is the nature of man to shit where he eats. Of course, this is not mutually exclusive to the Christian belief of Jesus' divinity. Both can be true. And I believe both are true.