Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?


  • Total voters
    62
I’m looking at physical evidence. You’re ignoring it because it blows you out of the water.

Now…stop dancing and tell us what took down the light poles. Your first lane attempt failed miserably.
A falsehood from CandyCorny on a Sunday morning!

You ignore the facts and evidence madam. In case you don't know, facts and evidence are not synonymous, but can be closely related.

Here are a few facts you totally ignore in your brainwashed state: The maneuver supposedly flown by Hani at the Pentagon was impossible in a transport category aircraft. Yes it could easily be flown in any fighter plane, but it could not be flown in a 757. There was no debris to be seen that was consistent with an airliner of any sort. Pictures alone show that, and it was corroborated by the statements of April Gallop who walked out through the hole. No airliner, no passenger seats, no passengers, no baggage.

You've been fooled Corny, and 20+ years later you still don't realize it.
 
A falsehood from CandyCorny on a Sunday morning!

You ignore the facts and evidence madam. In case you don't know, facts and evidence are not synonymous, but can be closely related.

Here are a few facts you totally ignore in your brainwashed state: The maneuver supposedly flown by Hani at the Pentagon was impossible in a transport category aircraft.
Not at all. And you cited no source in support if your statement
Yes it could easily be flown in any fighter plane, but it could not be flown in a 757. There was no debris to be seen that was consistent with an airliner of any sort.
All debris was consistent with AA77 having crashed there. Bodies were found at the site.

Now be a dear and explain the light poles
 
Not at all. And you cited no source in support if your statement

All debris was consistent with AA77 having crashed there. Bodies were found at the site.

Now be a dear and explain the light poles
Right Corny, and the clot shots are safe and effective. :laughing0301:
 
A falsehood from CandyCorny on a Sunday morning!

You ignore the facts and evidence madam. In case you don't know, facts and evidence are not synonymous, but can be closely related.

Here are a few facts you totally ignore in your brainwashed state: The maneuver supposedly flown by Hani at the Pentagon was impossible in a transport category aircraft. Yes it could easily be flown in any fighter plane, but it could not be flown in a 757. There was no debris to be seen that was consistent with an airliner of any sort. Pictures alone show that, and it was corroborated by the statements of April Gallop who walked out through the hole. No airliner, no passenger seats, no passengers, no baggage.

You've been fooled Corny, and 20+ years later you still don't realize it.
A falsehood from CandyCorny on a Sunday morning!

You ignore the facts and evidence madam. In case you don't know, facts and evidence are not synonymous, but can be closely related.

Here are a few facts you totally ignore in your brainwashed state: The maneuver supposedly flown by Hani at the Pentagon was impossible in a transport category aircraft. Yes it could easily be flown in any fighter plane, but it could not be flown in a 757. There was no debris to be seen that was consistent with an airliner of any sort. Pictures alone show that, and it was corroborated by the statements of April Gallop who walked out through the hole. No airliner, no passenger seats, no passengers, no baggage.

You've been fooled Corny, and 20+ years later you still don't realize it.
Don’t be fooled,candyass is a DUDE who thinks he is a woman,seriously,no joke.that should not surprise you though.
 
Pete doesn't give a damn what took down the light poles because Pete know AA77 did not. Pete knows the entire 911 Official Conspiracy Theory was bankrupt 20+ years ago.

Candy and critical thinking do not go together.
 
Pete doesn't give a damn what took down the light poles because Pete know AA77 did not. Pete knows the entire 911 Official Conspiracy Theory was bankrupt 20+ years ago.

Candy and critical thinking do not go together.
Funny neither you nor anyone else can show any evidence " bankrupting it "
 
Pete doesn't give a damn what took down the light poles because Pete know AA77 did not. Pete knows the entire 911 Official Conspiracy Theory was bankrupt 20+ years ago.

Candy and critical thinking do not go together.

You appear deranged, ignoring pesky evidence simply because you find it inconvenient.
 
You appear deranged, ignoring pesky evidence simply because you find it inconvenient.
The facts and evidence destroyed the official narrative more than 20 years ago. That you still buy into the official narrative suggests you are either really void in critical analysis, or that you work for a company like Bellingcat or Oryx whose job it is to promote official deceptions.
 
The facts and evidence destroyed the official narrative more than 20 years ago. That you still buy into the official narrative suggests you are either really void in critical analysis, or that you work for a company like Bellingcat or Oryx whose job it is to promote official deceptions.
No it did not
 
The facts and evidence destroyed the official narrative more than 20 years ago. That you still buy into the official narrative suggests you are either really void in critical analysis, or that you work for a company like Bellingcat or Oryx whose job it is to promote official deceptions.

LOL

You ignore the facts.

Parts of an American Airlines 757-200 were found in the wreckage. You ignore that.

Some remains from passengers known to be on AA77 were recovered and identified. You ignore that.

The entry hole, prior to collapsing, is in the shape of a plane. You ignore that.

Two rows of light poles were ripped out of the ground. You ignore that.

There was a fireball caused by jetfuel igniting. You ignore that.

Flight 77 was tracked on radar. You ignore that.

Flight 77 disappeared. You ignore that.

Your entire conspiracy resides only in your ignorance.
 
Pete doesn't give a damn what took down the light poles because Pete know AA77 did not.
Pete can’t explain what took down the light poles so he tries to minimize the importance.
Pete knows the entire 911 Official Conspiracy Theory was bankrupt 20+ years ago.
You and your shadow are the only ones who believe you.
Candy and critical thinking do not go together.
Physical evidince whispers louder than your whining.
 
LOL

You ignore the facts.

Parts of an American Airlines 757-200 were found in the wreckage. You ignore that.

Some remains from passengers known to be on AA77 were recovered and identified. You ignore that.

The entry hole, prior to collapsing, is in the shape of a plane. You ignore that.

Two rows of light poles were ripped out of the ground. You ignore that.

There was a fireball caused by jetfuel igniting. You ignore that.

Flight 77 was tracked on radar. You ignore that.

Flight 77 disappeared. You ignore that.

Your entire conspiracy resides only in your ignorance.
There were no remains of passengers found, no baggage, no passenger seats or passengers. The chicken shit "parts from a 757" would fit into a briefcase and were easily planted. As I recall it was some piece from inside the cabin that is found on virtually all airliners.

Silly boy Faun, the fireball would have been caused by ANY flying object, which I happily acknowledge. The trouble for your official narrative is many facts. In the first place the aerobatic maneuver that you defend was impossible in a transport category aircraft, patently absurd in ways that you, a non-pilot, cannot understand even if you wanted to. Secondly, because of the known distances from the parking lot camera to the point of impact, and the known dimensions of the 757, several people calculated and constructed orthographic projection of what a 757 at point of impact would have actually looked like. It's absurd. You probably don't know what orthographic projection is, and this was all known 20+ years ago. And you still promote the absurd claim today. CandyCorny&Faun, a match made in heaven.
:laughing0301:

And you expect to be taken seriously.
 
There were no remains of passengers found, no baggage, no passenger seats or passengers. The chicken shit "parts from a 757" would fit into a briefcase and were easily planted. As I recall it was some piece from inside the cabin that is found on virtually all airliners.

Silly boy Faun, the fireball would have been caused by ANY flying object, which I happily acknowledge. The trouble for your official narrative is many facts. In the first place the aerobatic maneuver that you defend was impossible in a transport category aircraft, patently absurd in ways that you, a non-pilot, cannot understand even if you wanted to. Secondly, because of the known distances from the parking lot camera to the point of impact, and the known dimensions of the 757, several people calculated and constructed orthographic projection of what a 757 at point of impact would have actually looked like. It's absurd. You probably don't know what orthographic projection is, and this was all known 20+ years ago. And you still promote the absurd claim today. CandyCorny&Faun, a match made in heaven.
:laughing0301:

And you expect to be taken seriously.

You poor thing. :itsok: Abject denials of reality are not actually an argument. Missiles explode, they don't create fireballs, hundreds of feet high.
 
You poor thing. :itsok: Abject denials of reality are not actually an argument. Missiles explode, they don't create fireballs, hundreds of feet high.
ya I keep asking where the crater is from the supposed missile.
 
There were no remains of passengers found,
1730529509590.webp

Passenger remains.

The chicken shit "parts from a 757" would fit into a briefcase and were easily planted.
1730529373972.webp

What size briefcase could carry this?
Silly boy Faun, the fireball would have been caused by ANY flying object, which I happily acknowledge. The trouble for your official narrative is many facts. In the first place the aerobatic maneuver that you defend was impossible in a transport category aircraft, patently absurd in ways that you, a non-pilot, cannot understand even if you wanted to. Secondly, because of the known distances from the parking lot camera to the point of impact, and the known dimensions of the 757, several people calculated and constructed orthographic projection of what a 757 at point of impact would have actually looked like. It's absurd. You probably don't know what orthographic projection is, and this was all known 20+ years ago. And you still promote the absurd claim today. CandyCorny&Faun, a match made in heaven.
:laughing0301:

And you expect to be taken seriously.
Well you won't/can't explain what took down the light poles. Whats worse is that you won't go anywhere near why the supposed provocateurs who staged the aircraft would add staging the light poles to their to-do list.
 
Have you ever come up with any answers for the light poles?


Have a light pole that is bent yet??

If the wing of a 757 clipped a light pole, the 757 would cartwheel and crash.
 
Back
Top Bottom