Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?


  • Total voters
    62
candycorn

You forgot to include other data in the Moussaoui trial. It's likely you're not even aware of it. In the discovery phase of that trial, the ONLY trial conducted regarding the events of the day, it was discovered in deposition that UA93 was actually still flying somewhere in Illinois 30 minutes after the official narrative said it crashed at Shanksville. That's why there was only 1 trial. Discovery shows the multiple failures of the official narrative.
 
candycorn

You forgot to include other data in the Moussaoui trial. It's likely you're not even aware of it. In the discovery phase of that trial, the ONLY trial conducted regarding the events of the day, it was discovered in deposition that UA93 was actually still flying somewhere in Illinois 30 minutes after the official narrative said it crashed at Shanksville. That's why there was only 1 trial. Discovery shows the multiple failures of the official narrative.
Of course none on that happened. You’re just being daft at this point.
 
One less thing for you to worry about if that is the case.

Any word on took down the light poles....yet?
Nope, no word on that bit of trivia, but it now become public knowledge that your critical thinking skills are non existent.
 
Nope, no word on that bit of trivia, but it now become public knowledge that your critical thinking skills are non existent.
Well, the fact that 5 light poles were knocked down isn’t trivial...it’s physical evidence clearly showing a commerical aircraft flew into the Pentagon on 9/11/2001. That you can’t explain what happened to them continues to destroy your claims to the contrary.... hence the personal attacks.

But what is more damaging to you is that you can’t explain why the alleged conpirators on the ground would add disabling 5 light poles (one hit a taxi too by the way) to their to-do list. It just adds to the pitiful position you’ve assumed.
 
Well, the fact that 5 light poles were knocked down isn’t trivial...it’s physical evidence clearly showing a commerical aircraft flew into the Pentagon on 9/11/2001. That you can’t explain what happened to them continues to destroy your claims to the contrary.... hence the personal attacks.

But what is more damaging to you is that you can’t explain why the alleged conpirators on the ground would add disabling 5 light poles (one hit a taxi too by the way) to their to-do list. It just adds to the pitiful position you’ve assumed.
Considering the events of the day the lightpoles are trivial indeed, completely meaningless except to suggest that the flying object that struck the Pentagon also struck the poles. My theory is still that it was a modified Douglas A-3, but that can't be proved all these years later.

Did you ever take Trigonometry in school? I did, in high school, and I took a few mechanical drawing classes in college. Do you know and understand what orthographic projection is?

Here's a bit about it for your frustrated mind. Orthographic projection - Wikipedia

Some people have done such an exercise based on the known dimensions of the Pentagon, a Boeing 757, and the known location of the parking lot camera. If you understood such things you would understand, but you're so deeply indoctrinated it likely won't have a positive effect. Best of luck to you.
 
Considering the events of the day the lightpoles are trivial indeed, completely meaningless except to suggest that the flying object that struck the Pentagon also struck the poles. My theory is still that it was a modified Douglas A-3, but that can't be proved all these years later.
Again, the A-3 doesn’t have the wing span. These are facts.
Some people have done such an exercise based on the known dimensions of the Pentagon, a Boeing 757, and the known location of the parking lot camera. If you understood such things you would understand, but you're so deeply indoctrinated it likely won't have a positive effect. Best of luck to you.
I won’t need it. The facts are firmly on my side. I will admit that your kookie positions are helpful in having reduced you to a complete laughing stock.
 
Again, the A-3 doesn’t have the wing span. These are facts.


I won’t need it. The facts are firmly on my side. I will admit that your kookie positions are helpful in having reduced you to a complete laughing stock.
LOL, no you don't need it. Fuck the math, eh Corny? You have such a simple mind, thoroughly brainwashed. Keep it up girl, you might get a job in the government.
 
LOL, no you don't need it.
Yes you do to have knocked down the light poles--the physical evidence (just some of the physical evidence) you can’t explain.
Fuck the math, eh Corny?
5 light poles > than your theories = you’re a loser. How’s that for math.
You have such a simple mind, thoroughly brainwashed. Keep it up girl, you might get a job in the government.
And the personal attacks continue...I’m happy to continue rubbing your nose in it.
 
candycorn

You forgot to include other data in the Moussaoui trial. It's likely you're not even aware of it. In the discovery phase of that trial, the ONLY trial conducted regarding the events of the day, it was discovered in deposition that UA93 was actually still flying somewhere in Illinois 30 minutes after the official narrative said it crashed at Shanksville. That's why there was only 1 trial. Discovery shows the multiple failures of the official narrative.
That nevert happened or you would have linked to it

You are a liar
 
No, it was a bunker buster cruise missile, it did not hit the ground, it smashed into the Pentagon here...



R.0a5273ad3a797a6dfcd9af7a28bfc5fe

You're deranged. :cuckoo:

That hole is 3 rings inside the Pentagon.

Missiles detonate upon impact. They don't pierce 3 rings of the Pentagon.

And that hole is an exit hole, not an entrance hole.
 
Considering the events of the day the lightpoles are trivial indeed, completely meaningless except to suggest that the flying object that struck the Pentagon also struck the poles. My theory is still that it was a modified Douglas A-3, but that can't be proved all these years later.

Did you ever take Trigonometry in school? I did, in high school, and I took a few mechanical drawing classes in college. Do you know and understand what orthographic projection is?

Here's a bit about it for your frustrated mind. Orthographic projection - Wikipedia

Some people have done such an exercise based on the known dimensions of the Pentagon, a Boeing 757, and the known location of the parking lot camera. If you understood such things you would understand, but you're so deeply indoctrinated it likely won't have a positive effect. Best of luck to you.

Sadly, you too prove to be deranged. Despite being shown proof the wheels of a Douglas A-3 DO NOT MATCH the wheel found inside the Pentagon, you still cling to that delusion.

face-palm-gif.278959
 



We're going to find out if Trump picks patriotic Americans for FBI Director and Attorney General... THIS TIME...

and that light pole is not bent, it is the same as the light poles still standing.... DUH....


911
Co2 FRAUD
Murderous Fraud Vax


Y'all at Mossad HQ have a lot to be worried about...
 
We're going to find out if Trump picks patriotic Americans for FBI Director and Attorney General... THIS TIME...

and that light pole is not bent, it is the same as the light poles still standing.... DUH....


911
Co2 FRAUD
Murderous Fraud Vax


Y'all at Mossad HQ have a lot to be worried about...
The truth will never come out, just think how that would fuck up this country
 
The truth will never come out, just think how that would fuck up this country


It has fucked up this country by not coming out.


The 911 Crowd needs a big time firing squad, and has since 912. All of it.

W crowd
911 billionaires
media liars
Mossad assassins
Cop "goon squads" like Chauvin's
CIA leadership plus
DoD leadership plus


The 911 billionaires made trillions on 911 with the insider info. All of that needs to go back to the US Treasury, and not just from Americans. Saudi Prince bin Salman needs to pay up too, or be taken out.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom