Did a right winger kill Kennedy???

[KevinWestern]

conspiracy crap

Oswald was a commie, he did Kennedy

end of story

Conspiracy crap?

60% of Americans (according to a recent gallop poll) believe that Oswald was not the lone shooter. We're not talking about a "fringe" conspiracy here like aliens are running the Whitehouse, lol. This is mainstream stuff. Heck John Kerry even came out recently publicly saying he didn't believe that Oswald acted alone on video.

Just want to point out that you are in the minority of Americans if you still believe that Oswald acted alone. The minority....

.

Who gives a crap what the sheeple of the far right and far left think?

They are unimportant.

And by the way...

JACKIE KENNEDY believed that LBJ killed her husband.

 

[Pennywise]

conspiracy crap

Oswald was a commie, he did Kennedy

end of story

So Jack Ruby was just a heart broken patriot?

 

[bitterlyclingin]

82 per cent of NYC high school grads can't read or write upon graduation. NYC voted 81 per cent for Barack Obama. No big surprise there. And you all remember Rachel Jeantell.
You can't fix stupid.

Oswald was a Commie. Kennedy was a normal American, fiscally Conservative. The Communist Party subverted, then seized control of the Democratic Party during the Vietnam War, something that absolutely never would have happened if Kennedy had lived.

The media plays the American people like a puppet master plays his puppet. NBC has ceased covering the Obamacare rollout debacle for the past 72 hours to take the heat off of Obama. They did the same thing with the Oswald metamorphosis, convertiing Oswald from avowed Commie activist to Tea party member.The media also knows you can't fix stupid, but you sure as Hell can manipulate them.

 

[Sallow]

What did he stand to gain? Except being arrested and executed?

It's probably good that you are sweetly naive about the ways of the world. I kinda' like that about you. I hope you always maintain such innocence.

What does any assassin have to "gain"?

The whole idea of assassin, is, it's a one way ticket.

The IRONY here is..the right ACCUSED Kennedy of being a communist.

But he turned out to be one of the most effective cold warriors..and was killed by a communist.

American Liberals hate communism..and have for a very long time.

Most assassins are paid. That's what they have to gain.

I suspect Oswald et al. were promised or given money.

Let's see....Oswald's stuck in a tiny apartment with a wife who could barely speak English and a baby.....And a shitty job.

But he was a Marine and had spent time in the USSR, so he had contacts....He knew how to shoot a high-powered rifle.

He was easily compromised.

A professional hit man couldn't have been used because it would have caused more chaos than we already endured. It would have been a case unsolved. It had to be someone they could set up.

Most assassins are paid?

You've been watching to many movies.

Most political assassins wind up dead.

 

[Sallow]

82 per cent of NYC high school grads can't read or write upon graduation. NYC voted 81 per cent for Barack Obama. No big surprise there. And you all remember Rachel Jeantell.
You can't fix stupid.

You just make this shit up as you go along or do you have help?

The US has about a 99% literacy rate.

 

[BlindBoo]

conspiracy crap

Oswald was a commie, he did Kennedy

end of story

Conspiracy crap?

60% of Americans (according to a recent gallop poll) believe that Oswald was not the lone shooter. We're not talking about a "fringe" conspiracy here like aliens are running the Whitehouse, lol. This is mainstream stuff. Heck John Kerry even came out recently publicly saying he didn't believe that Oswald acted alone on video.

Just want to point out that you are in the minority of Americans if you still believe that Oswald acted alone. The minority....

.

Who gives a crap what the sheeple of the far right and far left think?

They are unimportant.

It is the MSM that continues to report that Oswald was the lone assassin.

 

[Sallow]

Conspiracy crap?

60% of Americans (according to a recent gallop poll) believe that Oswald was not the lone shooter. We're not talking about a "fringe" conspiracy here like aliens are running the Whitehouse, lol. This is mainstream stuff. Heck John Kerry even came out recently publicly saying he didn't believe that Oswald acted alone on video.

Just want to point out that you are in the minority of Americans if you still believe that Oswald acted alone. The minority....

.

Who gives a crap what the sheeple of the far right and far left think?

They are unimportant.

Lol, we're "sheeple" for questioning a story the gov't gave us that's full of holes? Haha.

Sheep don't question, they just do. The gov't gives you a story and you go along with it despite any evidence to the contrary. Think you need to recheck that definition of "sheeple" Jakey.

This has been "questioned" to death.

And the conclusion usually is the same.

Oswald acted alone.

 

[KevinWestern]

Who gives a crap what the sheeple of the far right and far left think?

They are unimportant.

Lol, we're "sheeple" for questioning a story the gov't gave us that's full of holes? Haha.

Sheep don't question, they just do. The gov't gives you a story and you go along with it despite any evidence to the contrary. Think you need to recheck that definition of "sheeple" Jakey.

This has been "questioned" to death.

And the conclusion usually is the same.

Oswald acted alone.

Irregardless. Jake's analogy was not very bright because when you call someone a "sheep" it's generally because they're not questioning and just doing whatever people tell them to do.

 

[bitterlyclingin]

Like i said you can't fix stupid. The author of this Kansas City Newspaper article had better hope he never has to endure a colonoscopy because they'll have to flush out his entire intellect to allow the gastroenterologist to go up and in to snake out his pipes.

Kansas City Star Frets: The Same Conservatives That Killed JFK Might Kill Obama? | Weasel Zippers

 

[The T]

Like i said you can't fix stupid. The author of this Kansas City Newspaper article had better hope he never has to endure a colonoscopy because they'll have to flush out his entire intellect to allow the gastroenterologist to go up and in to snake out his pipes.

Kansas City Star Frets: The Same Conservatives That Killed JFK Might Kill Obama? | Weasel Zippers

Nothing like revisionist history. The left can and will never come to grips with one of their very own killed JFK.

 

[KevinWestern]

Like i said you can't fix stupid. The author of this Kansas City Newspaper article had better hope he never has to endure a colonoscopy because they'll have to flush out his entire intellect to allow the gastroenterologist to go up and in to snake out his pipes.

Kansas City Star Frets: The Same Conservatives That Killed JFK Might Kill Obama? | Weasel Zippers

Lol, silly article.

I like how it marginalizes the anger towards Obama as being solely because "he's different". It's as if we're not allowed to legitimately dislike the guy, regardless of whether or not he puts former monsanto execs into top FDA spots, or signs Constitution crushing legislation such as the NDAA 2012, or has prosecuted more whistleblowers in history, or stacked his administration full of lobbyists, or let the Pharm companies write Obamacare, or failed to lead the country in a period of great division, or failed to end the bailout, etc.

You MUST like him or you're a racist.

 

[Sallow]

Lol, we're "sheeple" for questioning a story the gov't gave us that's full of holes? Haha.

Sheep don't question, they just do. The gov't gives you a story and you go along with it despite any evidence to the contrary. Think you need to recheck that definition of "sheeple" Jakey.

This has been "questioned" to death.

And the conclusion usually is the same.

Oswald acted alone.

Irregardless. Jake's analogy was not very bright because when you call someone a "sheep" it's generally because they're not questioning and just doing whatever people tell them to do.

That's a good point.

 

[Redfish]

Kennedy is not dead. He is living in Costa Rica with Elvis and Marilyn Monroe and Jimmy Hoffa.

My proof is that the initials of costa rica are CR.

 

[gipper]

Who gives a crap what the sheeple of the far right and far left think?

They are unimportant.

Lol, we're "sheeple" for questioning a story the gov't gave us that's full of holes? Haha.

Sheep don't question, they just do. The gov't gives you a story and you go along with it despite any evidence to the contrary. Think you need to recheck that definition of "sheeple" Jakey.

This has been "questioned" to death.

And the conclusion usually is the same.

Oswald acted alone.

Wrong.

Many investigations concluded there was a conspiracy including the House Select Committee on Assassinations, District Attorney Jim Garrison, and numerous experts.

Merely viewing the Zapruder film proves there was a conspiracy and cover up. Funny...the government refused to let the public see the film until it came out 12 years after the murder.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

So many people want to romanticize the slaying of Kennedy, they just refuse to believe a plain little insignificant man could do in this great leader.
If you read the whole background of Oswald, you will come away with little doubt that he acted alone and managed to murder JFK.

The conspiratists do nothing but add confusion to this sad tragic story.

Oswald did it, get over it, move on.

 

[gipper]

So many people want to romanticize the slaying of Kennedy, they just refuse to believe a plain little insignificant man could do in this great leader.
If you read the whole background of Oswald, you will come away with little doubt that he acted alone and managed to murder JFK.

The conspiratists do nothing but add confusion to this sad tragic story.

Oswald did it, get over it, move on.

That is just what the State wants you to believe. You like many have chosen to ignore the facts and accept the BS. Educate yourself rather than run with the herd...this will help you greatly...

So, what’s different about the Kennedy assassination? Why have so many people over the years, including brilliant researchers and analysts, concluded that the national-security state orchestrated and carried out Kennedy’s assassination?

Among the reasons are:

The countless anomalies in the Kennedy case, anomalies that make absolutely no sense at all except in the context of a national-security state assassination.
The large body of circumstantial evidence pointing to a national-security state operation in the Kennedy assassination.
The manifest evidence of fraud in the autopsy, which was controlled by the the national-security state.
The fact that the national-security state had the motive to kill Kennedy, on grounds of national security.
The fact that the assassination fits within the pattern of regime-change operations, including assassination, in which the national-security state apparatus has been involved since its inception in 1947.
Consider some of the many anomalies.

1. The medical personnel at Parkland Hospital, FBI agent Clint Hill, and the FBI agents who attended the autopsy at Bethesda, all stated that the president had a large hole in the back of his head, indicating an exit wound, which means that a shot was fired from the front.

Yet, the official autopsy photographs show the back of Kennedy’s head to be intact.

We’re just supposed to ignore that. Or we’re expected to believe that all those people just made a mistake, independently of each other. The last thing we’re supposed to do is to conclude that the government falsified the evidence to cover up shots having been fired from the front. We’re supposed to just defer to authority and meekly accept the official version of events.

2. What about all the military personnel who stated that Kennedy’s body was secretly brought in early to the Bethesda morgue in a cheap shipping casket, unbeknownst to the public? Well, we’re expected to assume that they’re mistaken too or just lying. Never mind how improbable it is that a group of enlisted military men, along with the most prestigious funeral home in Washington, conspired to concoct a fake and false story about how Kennedy’s body was brought into the Bethesda morgue. We’re just supposed to meekly defer to authority and conclude that that they were just, for some unknown reason, engaged in a conspiracy with each other to concoct a fake and false story as to how JFK’s body was brought early into the morgue.

Otherwise, we might be tempted to conclude that national-security state officials were up to no good that night by bringing the body into the morgue earlier than everyone thought in order to make the necessary arrangements to hide the fact that shots had been fired from the front.

3. What about the two different brains that were examined after the autopsy? One brain exam session included the official autopsy photographer, who stated that the brain was sectioned or cut during the session, which is standard procedure to discover the direction of a gunshot.

But there is a problem. That official photographer denied that the photographs of the brain that are in the official record today were taken by him. That means that, unless he was lying, they were taken by some other, unknown photographer who attended a second brain exam session, one that included an autopsy pathologist who said that the brain wasn’t sectioned or cut at all.

Oh, and there’s another problem. The photographs of the brain in the official records show an almost complete brain, one with disrupted tissue but with all the mass still present, a brain that actually weighs more than an average brain, notwithstanding the fact that everyone agrees that at a large portion of Kennedy’s brain was blown out by the gun shot that hit him in the head.

But we are just supposed to passively accept all this and move on. After all, it’s just inconceivable that the U.S. military would be up to no good during the president’s autopsy.

4. Indeed, we’re not even supposed to think that anything was unusual when a team of Secret Service agents brandished guns and forced their way out of Parkland Hospital with the president’s body, implicitly threatening to kill the official Dallas medical examiner who was just doing his job by insisting that the body remain at Parkland to undergo an autopsy, as required by state law. We’re just supposed to accept the idea that federal agents would violate the law, threaten to kill hospital personnel, and jeopardize a criminal prosecution, all on their own initiative, rather than cooperate with state officials in the investigation of a very serious crime, as we would ordinarily expect them to do.

In fact, we’re not supposed to think that anything is unusual in the fact that Lyndon Johnson was patiently awaiting the delivery of Kennedy’s body at Dallas Love Field. After all, supposedly the assassination could have been the first step in a Soviet nuclear attack on the United States. But who are we to wonder why the new president, LBJ, would supposedly put chivalry toward Mrs. Kennedy ahead of the survival of the nation, especially given the deep hatred and antipathy he had for the Kennedy family?

5. Indeed, who are we question the fact that the feds took no adverse action whatsoever against an American citizen and former U.S. Marine who had supposedly given top-secret information to the Soviets, America’s official enemy throughout the Cold War?

Sure, we know how the feds treat people like Daniel Ellsberg, Chelsey (Bradley) Manning, John Walker Lindh, and Edward Snowden. They arrest them, they torture them, they abuse them, they prosecute them, and they incarcerate them.

And we also know how the CIA and the FBI viewed communist sympathizers during the Cold War, such as those in the U.S. Communist Party, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, and, according to national-security state officials, even the American civil-rights movement. They spied on them, they harassed them, they prosecuted them, they blackmailed them, they incarcerated them, and they ruined them.

But hey, Lee Harvey Oswald was different, right? He was only a guy who supposedly had shamed the Marines by becoming a communist, supposedly betrayed his country by supposedly delivering top-secret information he had acquired as a Marine to the Soviets, and supposedly defected to America’s official Cold War enemy (and World War II partner and ally), the Soviet Union.

Oh well, everyone makes mistakes, right? So, let’s just let bygones be bygones and even lend Oswald the money to get back home. And when he later asks for a new passport so he can go to Mexico, let’s rush and give him one-day urgent service.

And let’s not even think of harassing him, torturing him, abusing him, arresting him, or even subpoenaing him to testify before a federal grand jury about his supposed betrayal of his country.

And above all, let’s not think to ourselves that any of this is anything but normal behavior on the part of the feds, even when they are busy ferreting out and destroying communists in the State Department, the army, Hollywood, the Communist Party, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, the ACLU, and the civil-rights movement at the height of the Cold War.

6. Let’s also not ask where Oswald acquired his spy-craft skills, including getting post office boxes registered to bogus names, or even how he learned to speak fluent Russian while in the military. Those are things that we just shouldn’t think about it.

7. Or why Oswald would stamp “544 Camp Street” as the return address on his Fair Play for Cuba Committee pamphlets in New Orleans, which just happened to be an entrance to the offices of a retired FBI agent named Guy Bannister, who had close ties to anti-Castro Cubans and whose office just happened to be situated within walking distance of the FBI, CIA, Office of Naval Intelligence, and the fiercely anti-communist Reily Coffee Company, which had hired as an employee a supposed fierce pro-communist named Lee Harvey Oswald.

But we’re just not supposed to wonder about such things. We’re supposed to defer to authority and just move on.

8. Indeed, we’re not even supposed to wonder why the magic bullet that supposedly went through Kennedy’s neck and broke Gov. Connally’s rib and wrist bone was still in pristine condition and why it didn’t have one even tiny bit of flesh or blood on it. After all, what’s the alternative — that it was planted to frame an innocent man? Why, that’s just inconceivable. Everyone knows that the law-enforcement officials never frame innocent people.

9. Or what about those people on the grassy knoll who displayed Secret Service badges to keep people away immediately after the shooting when, in fact, there were no Secret Service agents on the grassy knoll? Well, that’s just something that we need to ignore too. It just couldn’t have happened. Those people must have been mistaken too or are also conspiring to establish a false conspiracy.

10. Indeed, Malcolm Perry, the Dallas emergency physician who performed a tracheotomy on Kennedy, and who stated three times at a press conference immediately after the assassination that the bullet hole in the front of Kennedy’s neck, which Perry obviously examined closely, was an entry wound, most assuredly must have been mistaken too. We should just defer to those military pathologists at Bethesda, who claim that they didn’t even notice the bullet wound in the front of the neck during the autopsy and instead concluded, after the autopsy was over and the body released, that the bullet wound in the front of the neck (that they hadn’t noticed) had to be an exit wound, one from which the magic bullet supposedly exited.

please read the entire column here: The National-Security State?s Assassination of John F. Kennedy The Future of Freedom Foundation

There are numerous excellent completely documented books on the subject. Please read some...once you do, you realize a coup d'etat occurred and the entire fraud that is the American government, is exposed.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Truth : Oswald was a communist.
But how many of you still believe Kennedy was killed by a right winger?


Slate calls a letter to Kennedy's press secretary warning JFK not to visit Dallas because he might be killed by a right-wing mob “eerily prophetic ...
Did the Tea Party Kill JFK? - Rich Lowry - POLITICO Magazine


In the early 1960s, a small but vocal subset of the Dallas power structure turned the political climate toxic, inciting a right-wing hysteria that led to attacks on visiting public figures. In the years and months before Kennedy was assassinated, Lyndon B. Johnson; his wife, Lady Bird; and Adlai E. Stevenson, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, were jostled and spat upon in Dallas by angry mobs. In sermons, rallies, newspapers and radio broadcasts, the city’s richest oil baron, a Republican congressman, a Baptist pastor and others, including the local John Birch Society, filled Dallas with an angry McCarthyesque paranoia. …
NYTimes: ?Right-wing hysteria? killed JFK | TheBlaze.com


Using Dan Rather as his expert, ex-CBS and current ABC reporter Byron Pitts perpetuated the myth that right-wing hate was somehow responsible for what occurred in Dallas: “Nowhere in Texas did the jagged edge of segregation cut deeper, anti-Kennedy sentiment spew any stronger. This flyer [“Wanted for Treason”] greeted the President when he arrived.”

Rather had warned: “Everybody knew, if there was going to be trouble anywhere, it would be in Dallas.”
ABC and Dan Rather Perpetuate Myth Right Wing Hate Killed Kennedy | NewsBusters

he was killed by a leftist

 

[healthmyths]

The Texas oil cartel killed Kennedy. Occam's Razor: Who had the most to gain from Kennedy's death? Who DID gain from it?
("Blood, Money and Power" Barr McClellan, attorney for the law firm representing LBJ, Austin, Texas)

Cheney and Halliburton were/are part of that cartel. Why did we invade Iraq and why are we in Afghanistan after 13 years? Who has gained the most?

Oh, and BTW, Barr McClellan is NOT a Democrat. His son, Scott McClellan, you all will remember, served as Bush's press secretary.

In November 1962, at the age of 21, Cheney was convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI). He was arrested for DWI again the following year.
Cheney said that the arrests made him "think about where I was and where I was headed. I was headed down a bad road if I continued on that course".
From 1995 until 2000, he served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Halliburton, a Fortune 500 company.

Dick Cheney - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So he wan't working for Halliburton when Kennedy was shot.
He went to work for them, 32 years after Kennedy was shot.
hmmmmm!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Texas oil cartel killed Kennedy. Occam's Razor: Who had the most to gain from Kennedy's death? Who DID gain from it?
("Blood, Money and Power" Barr McClellan, attorney for the law firm representing LBJ, Austin, Texas)

Cheney and Halliburton were/are part of that cartel. Why did we invade Iraq and why are we in Afghanistan after 13 years? Who has gained the most?

Oh, and BTW, Barr McClellan is NOT a Democrat. His son, Scott McClellan, you all will remember, served as Bush's press secretary.

that books is disinformation. there is a little truth to it but most of it is disinformation.a better book to read thats more accurate is JFK mastermind of the JFK assassination. the tile itself kinda betrays the truth because Johnson while he helped a lot in the planning of the assassination and coverup,it was the CIA mostly that did it.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

So many people want to romanticize the slaying of Kennedy, they just refuse to believe a plain little insignificant man could do in this great leader.
If you read the whole background of Oswald, you will come away with little doubt that he acted alone and managed to murder JFK.

The conspiratists do nothing but add confusion to this sad tragic story.

Oswald did it, get over it, move on.

That is just what the State wants you to believe. You like many have chosen to ignore the facts and accept the BS. Educate yourself rather than run with the herd...this will help you greatly...

So, what’s different about the Kennedy assassination? Why have so many people over the years, including brilliant researchers and analysts, concluded that the national-security state orchestrated and carried out Kennedy’s assassination?

Among the reasons are:

The countless anomalies in the Kennedy case, anomalies that make absolutely no sense at all except in the context of a national-security state assassination.
The large body of circumstantial evidence pointing to a national-security state operation in the Kennedy assassination.
The manifest evidence of fraud in the autopsy, which was controlled by the the national-security state.
The fact that the national-security state had the motive to kill Kennedy, on grounds of national security.
The fact that the assassination fits within the pattern of regime-change operations, including assassination, in which the national-security state apparatus has been involved since its inception in 1947.
Consider some of the many anomalies.

1. The medical personnel at Parkland Hospital, FBI agent Clint Hill, and the FBI agents who attended the autopsy at Bethesda, all stated that the president had a large hole in the back of his head, indicating an exit wound, which means that a shot was fired from the front.

Yet, the official autopsy photographs show the back of Kennedy’s head to be intact.

We’re just supposed to ignore that. Or we’re expected to believe that all those people just made a mistake, independently of each other. The last thing we’re supposed to do is to conclude that the government falsified the evidence to cover up shots having been fired from the front. We’re supposed to just defer to authority and meekly accept the official version of events.

2. What about all the military personnel who stated that Kennedy’s body was secretly brought in early to the Bethesda morgue in a cheap shipping casket, unbeknownst to the public? Well, we’re expected to assume that they’re mistaken too or just lying. Never mind how improbable it is that a group of enlisted military men, along with the most prestigious funeral home in Washington, conspired to concoct a fake and false story about how Kennedy’s body was brought into the Bethesda morgue. We’re just supposed to meekly defer to authority and conclude that that they were just, for some unknown reason, engaged in a conspiracy with each other to concoct a fake and false story as to how JFK’s body was brought early into the morgue.

Otherwise, we might be tempted to conclude that national-security state officials were up to no good that night by bringing the body into the morgue earlier than everyone thought in order to make the necessary arrangements to hide the fact that shots had been fired from the front.

3. What about the two different brains that were examined after the autopsy? One brain exam session included the official autopsy photographer, who stated that the brain was sectioned or cut during the session, which is standard procedure to discover the direction of a gunshot.

But there is a problem. That official photographer denied that the photographs of the brain that are in the official record today were taken by him. That means that, unless he was lying, they were taken by some other, unknown photographer who attended a second brain exam session, one that included an autopsy pathologist who said that the brain wasn’t sectioned or cut at all.

Oh, and there’s another problem. The photographs of the brain in the official records show an almost complete brain, one with disrupted tissue but with all the mass still present, a brain that actually weighs more than an average brain, notwithstanding the fact that everyone agrees that at a large portion of Kennedy’s brain was blown out by the gun shot that hit him in the head.

But we are just supposed to passively accept all this and move on. After all, it’s just inconceivable that the U.S. military would be up to no good during the president’s autopsy.

4. Indeed, we’re not even supposed to think that anything was unusual when a team of Secret Service agents brandished guns and forced their way out of Parkland Hospital with the president’s body, implicitly threatening to kill the official Dallas medical examiner who was just doing his job by insisting that the body remain at Parkland to undergo an autopsy, as required by state law. We’re just supposed to accept the idea that federal agents would violate the law, threaten to kill hospital personnel, and jeopardize a criminal prosecution, all on their own initiative, rather than cooperate with state officials in the investigation of a very serious crime, as we would ordinarily expect them to do.

In fact, we’re not supposed to think that anything is unusual in the fact that Lyndon Johnson was patiently awaiting the delivery of Kennedy’s body at Dallas Love Field. After all, supposedly the assassination could have been the first step in a Soviet nuclear attack on the United States. But who are we to wonder why the new president, LBJ, would supposedly put chivalry toward Mrs. Kennedy ahead of the survival of the nation, especially given the deep hatred and antipathy he had for the Kennedy family?

5. Indeed, who are we question the fact that the feds took no adverse action whatsoever against an American citizen and former U.S. Marine who had supposedly given top-secret information to the Soviets, America’s official enemy throughout the Cold War?

Sure, we know how the feds treat people like Daniel Ellsberg, Chelsey (Bradley) Manning, John Walker Lindh, and Edward Snowden. They arrest them, they torture them, they abuse them, they prosecute them, and they incarcerate them.

And we also know how the CIA and the FBI viewed communist sympathizers during the Cold War, such as those in the U.S. Communist Party, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, and, according to national-security state officials, even the American civil-rights movement. They spied on them, they harassed them, they prosecuted them, they blackmailed them, they incarcerated them, and they ruined them.

But hey, Lee Harvey Oswald was different, right? He was only a guy who supposedly had shamed the Marines by becoming a communist, supposedly betrayed his country by supposedly delivering top-secret information he had acquired as a Marine to the Soviets, and supposedly defected to America’s official Cold War enemy (and World War II partner and ally), the Soviet Union.

Oh well, everyone makes mistakes, right? So, let’s just let bygones be bygones and even lend Oswald the money to get back home. And when he later asks for a new passport so he can go to Mexico, let’s rush and give him one-day urgent service.

And let’s not even think of harassing him, torturing him, abusing him, arresting him, or even subpoenaing him to testify before a federal grand jury about his supposed betrayal of his country.

And above all, let’s not think to ourselves that any of this is anything but normal behavior on the part of the feds, even when they are busy ferreting out and destroying communists in the State Department, the army, Hollywood, the Communist Party, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, the ACLU, and the civil-rights movement at the height of the Cold War.

6. Let’s also not ask where Oswald acquired his spy-craft skills, including getting post office boxes registered to bogus names, or even how he learned to speak fluent Russian while in the military. Those are things that we just shouldn’t think about it.

7. Or why Oswald would stamp “544 Camp Street” as the return address on his Fair Play for Cuba Committee pamphlets in New Orleans, which just happened to be an entrance to the offices of a retired FBI agent named Guy Bannister, who had close ties to anti-Castro Cubans and whose office just happened to be situated within walking distance of the FBI, CIA, Office of Naval Intelligence, and the fiercely anti-communist Reily Coffee Company, which had hired as an employee a supposed fierce pro-communist named Lee Harvey Oswald.

But we’re just not supposed to wonder about such things. We’re supposed to defer to authority and just move on.

8. Indeed, we’re not even supposed to wonder why the magic bullet that supposedly went through Kennedy’s neck and broke Gov. Connally’s rib and wrist bone was still in pristine condition and why it didn’t have one even tiny bit of flesh or blood on it. After all, what’s the alternative — that it was planted to frame an innocent man? Why, that’s just inconceivable. Everyone knows that the law-enforcement officials never frame innocent people.

9. Or what about those people on the grassy knoll who displayed Secret Service badges to keep people away immediately after the shooting when, in fact, there were no Secret Service agents on the grassy knoll? Well, that’s just something that we need to ignore too. It just couldn’t have happened. Those people must have been mistaken too or are also conspiring to establish a false conspiracy.

10. Indeed, Malcolm Perry, the Dallas emergency physician who performed a tracheotomy on Kennedy, and who stated three times at a press conference immediately after the assassination that the bullet hole in the front of Kennedy’s neck, which Perry obviously examined closely, was an entry wound, most assuredly must have been mistaken too. We should just defer to those military pathologists at Bethesda, who claim that they didn’t even notice the bullet wound in the front of the neck during the autopsy and instead concluded, after the autopsy was over and the body released, that the bullet wound in the front of the neck (that they hadn’t noticed) had to be an exit wound, one from which the magic bullet supposedly exited.

please read the entire column here: The National-Security State?s Assassination of John F. Kennedy The Future of Freedom Foundation

There are numerous excellent completely documented books on the subject. Please read some...once you do, you realize a coup d'etat occurred and the entire fraud that is the American government, is exposed.

I notice the magic bullet theorists have no answers for these facts.