Dick Morris article

[NO!bama08]

TheHill.com

Great article. Here's a quote....

"As it becomes clearer that the deficit caused by spending has landed us in a new economic crisis, entirely of Obama’s own making, his popularity and job performance are likely to drop as well.

The old recession — that the public says was caused by Bush — shows signs of winding down. But the new recession and/or inflation — triggered by Obama’s massive deficits — is just now coming upon us.

If Obama refuses to cut back on his spending/stimulus plans (despite convincing evidence that Americans are not spending the money), he has three options:

a) He can raise taxes, which will trigger a deeper recession;

b) He can print money, which will trigger huge inflation;

c) He can pay more interest to borrow money, which will send the economy diving down again.

The blame for these outcomes will fall squarely on Obama’s deficit and spending policies. The fact that Americans are aware of these issues, and already disapprove of Obama’s performance on them, indicates that they will be increasingly receptive to blaming him for the “new” recession."
--------------------------------------------
Obviously what we needed was a true conservative president, but you liberals denied us that, now we all pay. Forget the parties, it's Conservative vs. Liberal. It's the last 5 liberal administrations that got us in this mess. How is the 6th in a row (pure socialist) going to
help the situation? He's a lame duck by mid-terms.

 

[Sinatra]

TheHill.com

Great article. Here's a quote....

"As it becomes clearer that the deficit caused by spending has landed us in a new economic crisis, entirely of Obama’s own making, his popularity and job performance are likely to drop as well.

The old recession — that the public says was caused by Bush — shows signs of winding down. But the new recession and/or inflation — triggered by Obama’s massive deficits — is just now coming upon us.

If Obama refuses to cut back on his spending/stimulus plans (despite convincing evidence that Americans are not spending the money), he has three options:

a) He can raise taxes, which will trigger a deeper recession;

b) He can print money, which will trigger huge inflation;

c) He can pay more interest to borrow money, which will send the economy diving down again.

The blame for these outcomes will fall squarely on Obama’s deficit and spending policies. The fact that Americans are aware of these issues, and already disapprove of Obama’s performance on them, indicates that they will be increasingly receptive to blaming him for the “new” recession."
--------------------------------------------
Obviously what we needed was a true conservative president, but you liberals denied us that, now we all pay. Forget the parties, it's Conservative vs. Liberal. It's the last 5 liberal administrations that got us in this mess. How is the 6th in a row (pure socialist) going to
help the situation? He's a lame duck by mid-terms.

Morris is correct.

The Obama White House is running a bit scared these days...

 

[Annie]

TheHill.com

Great article. Here's a quote....

"As it becomes clearer that the deficit caused by spending has landed us in a new economic crisis, entirely of Obama’s own making, his popularity and job performance are likely to drop as well.

The old recession — that the public says was caused by Bush — shows signs of winding down. But the new recession and/or inflation — triggered by Obama’s massive deficits — is just now coming upon us.

If Obama refuses to cut back on his spending/stimulus plans (despite convincing evidence that Americans are not spending the money), he has three options:

a) He can raise taxes, which will trigger a deeper recession;

b) He can print money, which will trigger huge inflation;

c) He can pay more interest to borrow money, which will send the economy diving down again.

The blame for these outcomes will fall squarely on Obama’s deficit and spending policies. The fact that Americans are aware of these issues, and already disapprove of Obama’s performance on them, indicates that they will be increasingly receptive to blaming him for the “new” recession."
--------------------------------------------
Obviously what we needed was a true conservative president, but you liberals denied us that, now we all pay. Forget the parties, it's Conservative vs. Liberal. It's the last 5 liberal administrations that got us in this mess. How is the 6th in a row (pure socialist) going to
help the situation? He's a lame duck by mid-terms.

Morris is correct.

The Obama White House is running a bit scared these days...

which the left recognizes and is responding to much better than the right ever would have. More effective, more diversions, more hard hitting-period.

 

[AllieBaba]

Well, how you quantify that I don't know..but if it makes you feel better it's a-ok by me.

 

[STAND4LIBERTY]

and already disapprove of Obama’s performance on them, indicates that they will be increasingly receptive to blaming him for the “new” recession."

Personally I would hope that instead of blaming President Obama that Americans wake up and start blaming the real culprit, namely, the silly collectivists notions that are the root cause of our current economic woes and that threaten to destroy the dollar, our economy and the prosperity of future generations. That way, Hopefully they won't just go back to the ballot box and elect a different set of idiots with different letters after there names that spout the same poisonous ideas.

Honestly what good would it do if we just elect a bunch of Republican Barney Franks, Harry Reids, Nancy Pelosis and Barak Obama's all that would be is exchanging one gang of tyrants for another gang of tyrants.

 

[Xenophon]

Anyone with sense knows when you are in a recession, tighen your belt, not spend more.

We all know what BO did, and he will end up paying for it politically as we end up paying for it economically.

 

[Chris]

Anyone with sense knows when you are in a recession, tighen your belt, not spend more.

We all know what BO did, and he will end up paying for it politically as we end up paying for it economically.

Anyone with any sense knows that when you are in a deflationary spiral, you have to spend money to create demand and keep people working.

 

[STAND4LIBERTY]

Anyone with any sense knows that when you are in a deflationary spiral, you have to spend money to create demand and keep people working.

LOL, maybe you should ask Henry Morgenthau how well that philosphy works....

 

[Xenophon]

Anyone with any sense knows that when you are in a deflationary spiral, you have to spend money to create demand and keep people working.

Nobody knows that, because it isn't true and only a fool or an idiot would suggest it.

 

[amrchaos]

TheHill.com

Great article. Here's a quote....

"As it becomes clearer that the deficit caused by spending has landed us in a new economic crisis, entirely of Obama’s own making, his popularity and job performance are likely to drop as well.

The old recession — that the public says was caused by Bush — shows signs of winding down. But the new recession and/or inflation — triggered by Obama’s massive deficits — is just now coming upon us.

If Obama refuses to cut back on his spending/stimulus plans (despite convincing evidence that Americans are not spending the money), he has three options:

a) He can raise taxes, which will trigger a deeper recession;

b) He can print money, which will trigger huge inflation;

c) He can pay more interest to borrow money, which will send the economy diving down again.

The blame for these outcomes will fall squarely on Obama’s deficit and spending policies. The fact that Americans are aware of these issues, and already disapprove of Obama’s performance on them, indicates that they will be increasingly receptive to blaming him for the “new” recession."
--------------------------------------------
Obviously what we needed was a true conservative president, but you liberals denied us that, now we all pay. Forget the parties, it's Conservative vs. Liberal. It's the last 5 liberal administrations that got us in this mess. How is the 6th in a row (pure socialist) going to
help the situation? He's a lame duck by mid-terms.

I am still trying to figure out how Bush was a liberal when conservatives refused to let the liberals impeach him.

Wait--it is because BUSH was an Ultra-conservative!!

Solution from the supposedly three bad decisions, Print more money and risk inflation. Later, after recovery is fully set in(the markets are back, have you seen our march up), raise taxes and cut spending in order to pay off the debt--which is the real problem that will make inflation a monster...

 

[Full-Auto]

I am still trying to figure out how Bush was a liberal when conservatives refused to let the liberals impeach him.


Imagination run amok.

Of course you will point where the dems actually ponied up the impeachment articles.

The fact is they didnt have the stones, of course dems havent had any stones since the 50s

 

[Shogun]

DICK MORRIS.




for a second I almost thought you guys were going to act like you gave this guy some attention. Clearly, this is a joke thread. I'd hate to imagine that any of you take the word of the Joan Rivers of conservative pundits seriously.

 

[NO!bama08]

DICK MORRIS.




for a second I almost thought you guys were going to act like you gave this guy some attention. Clearly, this is a joke thread. I'd hate to imagine that any of you take the word of the Joan Rivers of conservative pundits seriously.

.... and did you speak that way of him when he was helping Bill Clinton get elected?

 

[Shogun]

DICK MORRIS.




for a second I almost thought you guys were going to act like you gave this guy some attention. Clearly, this is a joke thread. I'd hate to imagine that any of you take the word of the Joan Rivers of conservative pundits seriously.

.... and did you speak that way of him when he was helping Bill Clinton get elected?

yes. and even MORESO when he acted like a bitter, spurned lover FOLLOWING his departure from Clinton politics. My guess is that Hillary walked in on him tryin on her skirts and shoes and that his whole "busted with a hooker" moment was good PR for the benefit of him parting ways.

Still, Morris and his opinions are not worth the time to read. Unless, of course, you are just looking for some baseless, topical blame the left bullshit that he can be depended upon to provide.