The biggest enemy of the "middle class" is big government, which increases costs and crowds out jobs...

[LeftofLeft]

Socialism by design has no room for a Middle Class. Socialism is all about a locked in 1 percent and then the masses.

 

[struth]

Socialism by design has no room for a Middle Class. Socialism is all about a locked in 1 percent and then the masses.

This is correct. There is no middle class in socialism. Socialism is simply slavery to the state

 

[Hector12]

When whites hear "big government" they think of government programs they dislike, such as affirmative action and welfare programs for illegitimate black children.

Nevertheless, middle class entitlements have broad, popular support. Republican politicians discover that as soon as they get serious about reducing the size of government.

 

[Crepitus]

Um me too.

Apparently not.

 

[struth]

Apparently not.

You don’t think the Govt can take your life, liberty or property by force??? Haha

 

[Crepitus]

You don’t think the Govt can take your life, liberty or property by force??? Haha

 

[FA_Q2]

The middle class does not have an enemy.

The idea is rather asinine.

 

[Moonglow]

It doesn't take a PhD to understand. When government spends more, it increases costs (via taxes or debt), and hence discourages investments in new jobs by the private sector...

government spending crowding out - Google Search

The phrase “crowding out” in economics refers to a situation where government spending (which is part of fiscal policy) discourages (private) investment spending in the economy. This is considered a bad thing, since investment spending is one of the key drivers of economic growth.


What made America great in the 1990s was that government spending was kept flat, under control. That produced a booming economy, a budget surplus, a strong and stable dollar, job growth, and the ever elusive low end wage inflation, where those at the bottom increase wealth.

Government spending is wasteful, corrupt, spent in foreign countries with no benefits to America. It destroys wealth. Private investment either creates wealth or it goes out of business. Government destroys wealth and keeps growing. As a nation, we need to create more wealth and stop destroying it. Our debt is $35 trillion, up from under $6 trillion when W took office...

It all started under W and Cheney, the explosion in spending the past quarter century.

To help the middle class, government spending needs to be cut, now.

Kamala will never ever do that....

She is not a fiscal conservative. She is the furthest thing from it... and when Kamala claims she is for the middle class, she is just as "credible" as saying she shut the border....

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4816859-kamala-harris-is-extremely-liberal-and-the-numbers-prove-it/

The 1990s had the era of the computer to bolster the economy what do we have now?

 

[ScorpioRising007]

It doesn't take a PhD to understand. When government spends more, it increases costs (via taxes or debt), and hence discourages investments in new jobs by the private sector...

government spending crowding out - Google Search

The phrase “crowding out” in economics refers to a situation where government spending (which is part of fiscal policy) discourages (private) investment spending in the economy. This is considered a bad thing, since investment spending is one of the key drivers of economic growth.


What made America great in the 1990s was that government spending was kept flat, under control. That produced a booming economy, a budget surplus, a strong and stable dollar, job growth, and the ever elusive low end wage inflation, where those at the bottom increase wealth.

Government spending is wasteful, corrupt, spent in foreign countries with no benefits to America. It destroys wealth. Private investment either creates wealth or it goes out of business. Government destroys wealth and keeps growing. As a nation, we need to create more wealth and stop destroying it. Our debt is $35 trillion, up from under $6 trillion when W took office...

It all started under W and Cheney, the explosion in spending the past quarter century.

To help the middle class, government spending needs to be cut, now.

Kamala will never ever do that....

She is not a fiscal conservative. She is the furthest thing from it... and when Kamala claims she is for the middle class, she is just as "credible" as saying she shut the border....

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4816859-kamala-harris-is-extremely-liberal-and-the-numbers-prove-it/

It also creates a lot of good paying government jobs people can get. Bigger government is actually ideal to move more to a socialist system which ultimately I think is in the best interest of the United States.

 

[pknopp]

The 1990s had the era of the computer to bolster the economy what do we have now?

The 90's created the 2008 implosion.

 

[EMH]

The 1990s had the era of the computer to bolster the economy what do we have now?

No question that drove some serious private sector wealth creation.

Today we have Co2 FRAUD with government funded wealth destruction, spending money on a bogus "crisis" that is not happening. Computers helped people and businesses get more competitive and create more wealth. Co2 FRAUD does just the opposite, it imposes costs and makes America less competitive.

Solution = zero out Co2 FRAUD and lives of those behind it, and confiscate their assets, which were all stolen over a lie

 

[EMH]

The 90's created the 2008 implosion.

No, that was about housing, and W's big spending big government handout centric philosophy blowing up housing and causing a crash in housing. W was the "anti conservative," he was 100% for using big government, treasonous lies, and selling us out at every chance to wreck the US, which he did.

 

[EMH]

which ultimately I think is in the best interest of the United States

Good thing your side lost this time, because socializing America is only in the best interest of America's enemies.

 

[pknopp]

No, that was about housing, and W's big spending big government handout centric philosophy blowing up housing and causing a crash in housing. W was the "anti conservative," he was 100% for using big government, treasonous lies, and selling us out at every chance to wreck the US, which he did.

The entire banking debacle. Right, that had nothing to do with it. LOL

 

[EMH]

The entire banking debacle. Right, that had nothing to do with it. LOL

What are MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES???


W pushed "LOW INCOME HOUSING" and the qualifications for mortgages were changed to allow those who could not fund the mortgage payments to "buy" the home, which assumed the home would just go up in value.

When the MBS values plunged, so did the solvency of the banks who owned them....

 

[pknopp]

What are MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES???

All bogus during the time frame we are speaking about but it kept the markets rolling..........for awhile.

W pushed "LOW INCOME HOUSING" and the qualifications for mortgages were changed to allow those who could not fund the mortgage payments to "buy" the home, which assumed the home would just go up in value.

When the MBS values plunged, so did the solvency of the banks who owned them....

It was a far bigger scam than that.

 

[Hector12]

No question that drove some serious private sector wealth creation.

Today we have Co2 FRAUD with government funded wealth destruction, spending money on a bogus "crisis" that is not happening. Computers helped people and businesses get more competitive and create more wealth. Co2 FRAUD does just the opposite, it imposes costs and makes America less competitive.

Solution = zero out Co2 FRAUD and lives of those behind it, and confiscate their assets, which were all stolen over a lie

The scientific evidence supportive of man made global warming is overwhelming. It does not go away because you do not want to believe it.

 

[EMH]

The scientific evidence supportive of man made global warming is overwhelming. It does not go away because you do not want to believe it.

There is NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Co2 does anything.

There is DATA and there is FUDGE.


THEORY = increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming

Instruments = we have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons


The DATA

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling


Translation from NBC spin = for more than 3 decades of rising atmospheric Co2, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere

SCIENCE = THEORY REJECTED

"the science" DEI/CRT bullshit = FUDGE THE DATA and claim "warming" THAT DOES NOT EXIST....


Can you answer basic climate questions???

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

 

[Hector12]

There is NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Co2 does anything.

Every year the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere rises. Every year the earth's climate becomes hotter. That is impressive evidence.