Deranged woman in MD threw a large rock through the window of a home that had a Charlie Kirk flag

View attachment 1211049

By this measure Kirk's murder was also not an assassination.

Do you agree with the NRA's comments today about the killing of Pretti and his legal possession of a firearm?
No the poor radicalized leftist was clearly laying in wait and it was done in surprise

I am not sure what their statement was, but I have no issue with anti legally owning a fire arm

He’d be a live today has he not taken his legally owned fire arm and then engaged in unlawful activity
 
The British fought the Nazis for two long years before Americans got involved and just as in WW1 the motive was never moral but because of Pearl Harbor.

The British repelled a Nazi air invasion eighteen months before the US entered the war and the US only entered the war because they needed help against the Japanese Empire and the British Empire had colonies and troops all over the far east at the time whereas the US had precious little assets.

The US was rather supportive of the Third Reich at the outbreak of WW2 and there were even Nazi rallies in Madison Square Garden.

WW1 is a similar story few Americans wanted to get involved but the US did so anyway for geopolitical reasons just before that war ended.


The British and France abandoned Poland to her fate after years of appeasing Hitler.

The British promptly lost Malaysia and Singapore to the Japanese in the greatest defeat in British military history. The Americans saved Australia from the Japanese after they bombed Darwin and threatened Port Moresby with invasion (Battle of the Coral Sea).

FDR was assisting the UK prior to Pearl Harbor.

Why would the US want to get involved in WWI prior to Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare and the Zimmerman telegram?
When the US did declare war on Germany, the US Army massive expeditionary army crushed the exhausted Germans in 1918.
 
The British fought the Nazis for two long years before Americans got involved and just as in WW1 the motive was never moral but because of Pearl Harbor.

The British repelled a Nazi air invasion eighteen months before the US entered the war and the US only entered the war because they needed help against the Japanese Empire and the British Empire had colonies and troops all over the far east at the time whereas the US had precious little assets.

The US was rather supportive of the Third Reich at the outbreak of WW2 and there were even Nazi rallies in Madison Square Garden.

WW1 is a similar story few Americans wanted to get involved but the US did so anyway for geopolitical reasons just before that war ended.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
The UK was trying to keep Germany from invasion of Britain after the Dunkirk fiasco.
However, the U.S. was providing aid in other ways before the Lend-Lease Act:
The Lend-Lease Act was passed in March 1941, only about nine months before the attack on Pearl Harbor.

  • "Cash and Carry" (1939): After Germany invaded Poland in September 1939, the U.S. amended its Neutrality Act to allow Britain and France to buy military supplies, provided they paid in cash and transported the goods on their own ships.
  • Destroyers-for-Bases Deal (September 1940): The U.S. transferred 50 World War I-era naval destroyers to the British in exchange for 99-year leases on British naval and air bases in the Atlantic and Caribbean.
The Lend-Lease program significantly increased the flow of supplies, food, and war materials to Britain, which was running out of cash to purchase equipment by late 1940. The first Lend-Lease shipments arrived in Britain in late April 1941.

Please note that the bulk of military offensive and defensive materiel was abandoned by the Brits at Dunkirk.
What saved Britain from invasion was the Battle of Britain and supplies from the U.S. that included the U.S. providing crucial, if unofficial, support to the UK while technically neutral. A small, elite group of American pilots fought within the Royal Air Force (RAF), while the U.S. government began establishing "cash-and-carry" arms sales, laying groundwork for the massive Lend-Lease aid that followed in 1941.
 
Silly, was the Oklahoma bombing a left wing terrorist action?

Was the storming and vandalism and violence in the Capitol in 2020 the work of a left leaning organization?

Shooting Kirk was not an act of terrorism it was a targeted assassination.
<~~~~~~~~~~>​
Why did you omit the 2020 "Summer of Love" that cost lives of citizens and LEO's, and the Billions of dollars in damages cost by arson and pillaging of businesses in more than 200 cities?
Yes indeed. the targeted assassination of Charlie Kirk committed by a Leftist pro LGBTQ acolyte.
If you try to make a point, try not to weigh it one way include it all...
 
Shame you missed world war two, you'd have loved it, maybe you'll get your chance in world war three.

Shut up Jackass. You haven't been here 2 weeks yet and you are already talking dumber than a box of doorknobs already.

But then, I realize that when you are getting your ass handed to you everyday, all a person like you has left is stupid barbs.
 
All the credible evidence shows that violent behavior is mostly committed by the right.
What would make your posts credible is if you put some validated empirical data to back it up instead of your entitlement to have your opinion be accepted as fact.
 
What's in his right hand?
HIS ******* PHONE.

Alex acted legally and lawfully for every second of the encounter up until his body went cold from death. He didnt interfere. He was accosted by an "agent" who closed distance to meet him. He raised his hands in a non threatening way to deescalate the roided up "agent". He never pushed, punched, and more importantly never threatened the "agents". He had a phone in his right hand the entire time until he was shot. His left hand is visibly empty. In the last second of his life he is on his knees, beaten, with his phone still in his hand, unarmed.

1769428342353.webp
 
HIS ******* PHONE.

Alex acted legally and lawfully for every second of the encounter up until his body went cold from death. He didnt interfere. He was accosted by an "agent" who closed distance to meet him. He raised his hands in a non threatening way to deescalate the roided up "agent". He never pushed, punched, and more importantly never threatened the "agents". He had a phone in his right hand the entire time until he was shot. His left hand is visibly empty. In the last second of his life he is on his knees, beaten, with his phone still in his hand, unarmed.

View attachment 1211257
.

YOUR ******* EDITED PHOTO.

Your cult is famous for it.







.
 
Look, Hondo sock, it’s the lib M.O. The crazed ***** is an overweight, affluent female living in a far-left area who hates people who supported Charlie Kirk, and commits violence.
Don't you live in a far right affluent area and you hate folks of color and you are ok with folks being murdered that aren't racist like yourself. So, you and this woman are pretty much one and the same.
 
HIS ******* PHONE.

Alex acted legally and lawfully for every second of the encounter up until his body went cold from death. He didnt interfere. He was accosted by an "agent" who closed distance to meet him. He raised his hands in a non threatening way to deescalate the roided up "agent". He never pushed, punched, and more importantly never threatened the "agents". He had a phone in his right hand the entire time until he was shot. His left hand is visibly empty. In the last second of his life he is on his knees, beaten, with his phone still in his hand, unarmed.

View attachment 1211257

Oh, so he hears them yelling about his gun and he continues to resist arrest and move a black object around his waistband? He basically killed himself. These are the weak minded fools that the left is inciting to violence.

Remember this: Ashli Babbitt didn't have a gun.
 
All the credible evidence shows that violent behavior is mostly committed by the right.

When was the last time the "right" attacked LEO or burned down a city? When was the last time "the right" assassinated a political opponent? The left has been doing this for over a decade now. They shot the president, shot and killed Charlie Kirk, shot up a baseball game full of republicans.

The only time I can think of when "the right" was involved in anything was when the cops let them into the capitol. That was proven to be set up by the left to entrap the right to get what they wanted. FBI agents by the HUNDREDS in the crowd. The only person shot and killed was an unarmed white woman by a black man.
 
Last edited:
HIS ******* PHONE.

Alex acted legally and lawfully for every second of the encounter up until his body went cold from death. He didnt interfere. He was accosted by an "agent" who closed distance to meet him. He raised his hands in a non threatening way to deescalate the roided up "agent". He never pushed, punched, and more importantly never threatened the "agents". He had a phone in his right hand the entire time until he was shot. His left hand is visibly empty. In the last second of his life he is on his knees, beaten, with his phone still in his hand, unarmed.

View attachment 1211257
No, he did not act lawfully. He brought a gun and ammunition to a violent riot that is interfering with ICE officers’ enforcement of American laws.
 
All the credible evidence shows that violent behavior is mostly committed by the right.
Like the summer of love where hundreds of thousands of radical leftists burned, looted, and murdered their way across America?

Or what we see in Minneapolis now?
 
15th post
YOUR ******* EDITED PHOTO.

Your cult is famous for it.
.
Not edited. You just walked into the obvious answer. This is what was in his hand at death. The same thing that he started with in his hand. Is this edited too?

1769429222897.webp
 
Guys lets not forget, the left justified Babbitts murder saying she was "breaking into the capitol." Even though she was unarmed and walked in through an open door.

They are saying this guy's killing wasn't justified when he attacked LEO and HAD A LOADED GUN AND MULTIPLE LOADED MAGAZINES IN HIS WAISTBAND.

The double standard here is UNBELIEVABLE.
 
Last edited:
Oh, so he hears them yelling about his gun and he continues to resist arrest and move a black object around his waistband? He basically killed himself. These are the weak minded fools that the left is inciting to violence.

Remember this: Ashli Babbitt didn't have a gun.
He was never under arrest. He wasnt being charged with anything. They are not the police. He was well off to the side of the street. Here is where he was when he was approached and sprayed and pushed. There is nothing he is obstructing he is out of the way. He was never breaking a law, was never detained, was never charged with anything. He was assaulted.

Moved a black object? He had his phone in his hand from the second he was approached. He never dropped it.

He was assaulted. Was legally carrying a weapon. During the assault an agent panicked and shot him. He was an untrained murderer. He will be in jail.

1769429318516.webp
 
He was never under arrest. He wasnt being charged with anything. They are not the police. He was well off to the side of the street. Here is where he was when he was approached and sprayed and pushed. There is nothing he is obstructing he is out of the way. He was never breaking a law, was never detained, was never charged with anything. He was assaulted.

Moved a black object? He had his phone in his hand from the second he was approached. He never dropped it.

He was assaulted. Was legally carrying a weapon. During the assault an agent panicked and shot him. He was an untrained murderer. He will be in jail.

View attachment 1211266

He was clearly resisting federal law enforcement agents. They were trying to detain him. Are you blind?


Remember this: Ashli Babbitt didn't have a gun.
 
Back
Top Bottom