Democrats would abolish Supreme Court, elect judges, let United Nations decide

[JustAGuy1]

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.

While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before the recent decisions, a new survey found support for killing the court, electing judges, and even allowing the United Nations to have the final say.

A new Rasmussen Reports survey sponsored by the Heartland Institute, for example, found that 39% of Democrats would let the U.N. reverse Supreme Court decisions it viewed as human rights violations. The reversal of Roe vs. Wade could fall into that category.

Worse, a majority (53%) of Democrats would support legislation to “abolish” the court and turn it into an elected chamber with judges picked on ballots. Just 21% of Republicans agree with that proposal.

Democrats would abolish Supreme Court, elect judges, let United Nations decide - Washington Examiner

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Imagine that.

 

[Esdraelon]

Imagine that.

Once a population is dumbed down sufficiently and is taught to hate and envy each other, anything is possible. The only consolation I feel is that IF they succeed, they and their children will suffer along with the rest of us and they'll finally understand that the hate won't keep them warm or feed their children. Fools...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

When the nation has collapsed, we will not need any judges or courts. As a UN protectorate they will make all our decisions for us.

 

[excalibur]

The Supreme Court and the Chief Justice are the third branch of the Federal government. No legislation can eliminate either the Court or the office of Chief Justice. You would need a Constitutional Amendment to do that.

Allow the UN to overrule our Court? Again that would require a Constitutional amendment. Where did they find these derps who believe such stupid stuff? But Democrats are the smart ones.

 

[Toro]

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.

While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before the recent decisions, a new survey found support for killing the court, electing judges, and even allowing the United Nations to have the final say.

A new Rasmussen Reports survey sponsored by the Heartland Institute, for example, found that 39% of Democrats would let the U.N. reverse Supreme Court decisions it viewed as human rights violations. The reversal of Roe vs. Wade could fall into that category.

Worse, a majority (53%) of Democrats would support legislation to “abolish” the court and turn it into an elected chamber with judges picked on ballots. Just 21% of Republicans agree with that proposal.

Democrats would abolish Supreme Court, elect judges, let United Nations decide - Washington Examiner

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Imagine that.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Once a population is dumbed down sufficiently and is taught to hate and envy each other, anything is possible. The only consolation I feel is that IF they succeed, they and their children will suffer along with the rest of us and they'll finally understand that the hate won't keep them warm or feed their children. Fools...

Except that they’ll never understand that. They’ll just continue to parrot the propaganda fed to them. That’s how we got here.

 

[pknopp]

How many on here have argued they support international asylum laws over US laws?

 

[Resnic]

The probability of this increases if you find people like bill gates giving money to the UN or having input with them directly or indirectly.

I imagine having the UN dictate for western civilizations would be a definite new world order scenario. Because if the us was controlled by them it wouldn't be long before Trudeau handed Canada over, then another country and another.

This is very feasible because things have been changing too rapidly in the past 18 months. We have seen america change such a great deal in the past 2 years, more so than it had the previous 30 years. Something is going on in some capacity. I think in some way trump was holding back the flood because he didn't go along with any of this nonsense that pretty much started as soon as he left office and hasn't let up since. I think whatever is going on starts with america and it's why they are desperate to keep him out of it because he didn't drink the proverbial Kool aid.

 

[Ralph Norton]

How many on here have argued they support international asylum laws over US laws?

How many liberals are here? That's your answer.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Once a population is dumbed down sufficiently and is taught to hate and envy each other, anything is possible. The only consolation I feel is that IF they succeed, they and their children will suffer along with the rest of us and they'll finally understand that the hate won't keep them warm or feed their children. Fools...

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.

While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before the recent decisions, a new survey found support for killing the court, electing judges, and even allowing the United Nations to have the final say.

A new Rasmussen Reports survey sponsored by the Heartland Institute, for example, found that 39% of Democrats would let the U.N. reverse Supreme Court decisions it viewed as human rights violations. The reversal of Roe vs. Wade could fall into that category.

Worse, a majority (53%) of Democrats would support legislation to “abolish” the court and turn it into an elected chamber with judges picked on ballots. Just 21% of Republicans agree with that proposal.

Democrats would abolish Supreme Court, elect judges, let United Nations decide - Washington Examiner

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Imagine that.

The United Nations is in no position to determine and judge perceived human rights violations in when too many of the member nations blatantly engage in slavery and other human rights violations.

The United Nations was created by US liberals as an apology to the rest of the world for US exceptionalism.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Yep, that's today's Dimocrat party! It's shameful.

 

[pknopp]

How many liberals are here? That's your answer.

That's never who I have to argue US law over international laws over.

 

[iceberg]

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.

While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before the recent decisions, a new survey found support for killing the court, electing judges, and even allowing the United Nations to have the final say.

A new Rasmussen Reports survey sponsored by the Heartland Institute, for example, found that 39% of Democrats would let the U.N. reverse Supreme Court decisions it viewed as human rights violations. The reversal of Roe vs. Wade could fall into that category.

Worse, a majority (53%) of Democrats would support legislation to “abolish” the court and turn it into an elected chamber with judges picked on ballots. Just 21% of Republicans agree with that proposal.

Democrats would abolish Supreme Court, elect judges, let United Nations decide - Washington Examiner

The recent decisions by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on abortion and guns appear to have pushed Democrats deeper into seeking radical changes that would shift the court back into liberal hands.While, for many, simply packing the court with more left-wing judges was the answer before...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Imagine that.

i'll bet they'd want dropboxes as well.

 

[hadit]

The Supreme Court and the Chief Justice are the third branch of the Federal government. No legislation can eliminate either the Court or the office of Chief Justice. You would need a Constitutional Amendment to do that.

Allow the UN to overrule our Court? Again that would require a Constitutional amendment. Where did they find these derps who believe such stupid stuff? But Democrats are the smart ones.

Don't forget that it wasn't very long ago some Justices were citing foreign law in their decisions on the court. That's some scary stuff right there.

 

[excalibur]

Don't forget that it wasn't very long ago some Justices were citing foreign law in their decisions on the court. That's some scary stuff right there.

Breyer was among those doing theta. Funny thing, Breyer didn't cite the laws on abortion in the EU. Gee, I wonder why.

 

[struth]

Further proof the Demafacist are taking a play right out of their partners the National Socialist Party and want to create their own party courts...the National Socialist referred to them as the "People's Court" People's Court (Germany) - Wikipedia