protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,559
- 21,705
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #21
AIC is about as neutral on immigration as Kilmar Abrego Garcia.'Well damn, guess that almost eighty years old things explains a lot. Why are you incessant on living in a fantasy world where Biden and Obama didn't deport anyone. Deportations require a deportation order, and yes, those scheduled for immigration court generally show up. It is total ignorance to claim that those rates of court appearances only were high under Trump.
![]()
Measuring In Absentia Removal in Immigration Court - American Immigration Council
This analysis of data provided by the federal government reveals that 83% of all nondetained immigrants with completed or pending removal cases attended all their hearings from 2008 to 2018.www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org
From 2008 to 2018. Stop the damn stupid. And companies can't raise prices, then why the **** don't we increase the corporate tax rate. Hell, prices are already set at the market price. You flippin Republicans are a damn hoot. But the remittances thing, that is really stupid. An immigrant sends a hundred dollars to, hell I don't know, Honduras. That is one hundred dollars going out of the domestic economy. That is one hundred dollars that you don't have to compete against when it comes to purchasing.
I mean your guys are not consistent. So, inflation is spurred by the government printing dollars, that is more dollars chasing the same amount of goods. So how is less dollars, chasing the same amount of goods, not helpful in controlling inflation? Hell, it is common sense. The immigrant produces goods here, gets paid, and then sends the money away. More goods, less dollars, DU HUH. The reality is those remittances have an overwhelming positive impact here and are often times extremely destabilizing to the receiving country, spurring inflation there, dependency, loss of productivity, the list goes on.
I mean where do you get that two billion in sales lost, is that the amount of remittances in a year. Two ******* billion dollars paid to workers to produce and then sent away. This is damn common sense.
Being almost 80 years old explains WHAT ?
Upon what do you base the claim that " It is total ignorance to claim that rates of court appearances only were high under Trump" ?
Your paragraphs are some of the most convoluted jumbles of jibberish I've ever seen. I find it had to address them because it is near impossible to ascertain what the hell you're even saying. Might as well be posting in Chinese.
Yeah prices (generally) are set at the market price. Like I said, (highest price the firm can charge without triggering SALES REDUCTIONS).You heard right.
What's the matter ? You flunked Microeconomics 101 ? A simple thing like that and you have to have it told to you twice ?
"one hundred dollars going out of the domestic economy" is one hundred $$ of sales reductions to US businesses. Get it ?
What you said about remittances is not only completely WRONG, it is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard anybody say about remittances, Obviously, you are WAAAy over your head & out of your league in this discussion, and I see no point in talking to somebody who obviously just likes to shoot his mouth off, but has no idea what he's talking about.
Yes, 200 Billion $$/year in remittances leaving the US, is 200 Billion $$/year in lost sales, which if paid to Americans (not sending remittances) it would be spent in the US, and those US businesses would be getting those sales. Get it ? Duh!
Whatever else you are yammering about, I don't know, and care less. Find someone else to talk to.