Democrats – party of diversity.

[Thinker101]

Except not so much in San Francisco. Wait, what? Yep, San Francisco’s diversity is dwindling. Actually it was more diverse back in the 70’s than it is now. For example, in 1970, San Francisco was 13 percent black, now it’s 8 percent. Same trend with Asians under 18, a significant part of the youth population. But instead of increasing, that number is gradually sliding down: It was 36 percent in 1990, and 32 percent in 2007. Anyone care to explain why the party of diversity isn’t so diverse?

Study finds S.F.'s ethnic diversity dwindling

 

[MarcATL]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

If you're truly concerned about diversity, common sense dictates that you'd address that issue first, since that's were the LEAST amount of diversity is.

No?

 

[Thinker101]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

If you're truly concerned about diversity, common sense dictates that you'd address that issue first, since that's were the LEAST amount of diversity is.

No?

Yea, common sense suggests you stay on topic.

 

[Sunni Man]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

 

[harmonica]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

If you're truly concerned about diversity, common sense dictates that you'd address that issue first, since that's were the LEAST amount of diversity is.

No?

they don't FORCE people not to join ----hahahahahahhahahahahahahah
.....blacks are free to join --except blacks are racist white haters--so they don't want to

 

[harmonica]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

the BLACKS/Dems are the racists --obviously
the whites are more fair/equal/unbiased--OBVIOUSLY
picture is worth a thousand words

 

[beagle9]

Except not so much in San Francisco. Wait, what? Yep, San Francisco’s diversity is dwindling. Actually it was more diverse back in the 70’s than it is now. For example, in 1970, San Francisco was 13 percent black, now it’s 8 percent. Same trend with Asians under 18, a significant part of the youth population. But instead of increasing, that number is gradually sliding down: It was 36 percent in 1990, and 32 percent in 2007. Anyone care to explain why the party of diversity isn’t so diverse?

Study finds S.F.'s ethnic diversity dwindling

Could be that once assimilated or became educated, that they just moved on into the interior where they really wanted to be in life.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

If you're truly concerned about diversity, common sense dictates that you'd address that issue first, since that's were the LEAST amount of diversity is.

No?

Because it’s not and you need to stop reading Soros.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Because minorities often can't afford San Francisco.

 

[Thinker101]

Except not so much in San Francisco. Wait, what? Yep, San Francisco’s diversity is dwindling. Actually it was more diverse back in the 70’s than it is now. For example, in 1970, San Francisco was 13 percent black, now it’s 8 percent. Same trend with Asians under 18, a significant part of the youth population. But instead of increasing, that number is gradually sliding down: It was 36 percent in 1990, and 32 percent in 2007. Anyone care to explain why the party of diversity isn’t so diverse?

Study finds S.F.'s ethnic diversity dwindling

Could be that once assimilated or became educated, that they just moved on into the interior where they really wanted to be in life.

That's true. Or they could have gotten tired of the empty promises.

 

[Moonglow]

Except not so much in San Francisco. Wait, what? Yep, San Francisco’s diversity is dwindling. Actually it was more diverse back in the 70’s than it is now. For example, in 1970, San Francisco was 13 percent black, now it’s 8 percent. Same trend with Asians under 18, a significant part of the youth population. But instead of increasing, that number is gradually sliding down: It was 36 percent in 1990, and 32 percent in 2007. Anyone care to explain why the party of diversity isn’t so diverse?

Study finds S.F.'s ethnic diversity dwindling

What makes you think everyone in San Fran is a democrat?

 

[B. Kidd]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

Civics is not their strong suit.

 

[Moonglow]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

the BLACKS/Dems are the racists --obviously
the whites are more fair/equal/unbiased--OBVIOUSLY
picture is worth a thousand words

Your statement only contradicts itself and is a syllogistic fallacy of comparison.

 

[Thinker101]

Except not so much in San Francisco. Wait, what? Yep, San Francisco’s diversity is dwindling. Actually it was more diverse back in the 70’s than it is now. For example, in 1970, San Francisco was 13 percent black, now it’s 8 percent. Same trend with Asians under 18, a significant part of the youth population. But instead of increasing, that number is gradually sliding down: It was 36 percent in 1990, and 32 percent in 2007. Anyone care to explain why the party of diversity isn’t so diverse?

Study finds S.F.'s ethnic diversity dwindling

What makes you think everyone in San Fran is a democrat?

Yep, sure not claiming everyone in SF is a democrat, there's got to be a few bright ones.

 

[harmonica]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

the BLACKS/Dems are the racists --obviously
the whites are more fair/equal/unbiased--OBVIOUSLY
picture is worth a thousand words

Your statement only contradicts itself and is a syllogistic fallacy of comparison.

hahahhahahahahhahahahahahahaha
you speak with forked tongue and idiocy
it's RIGHT THERE---you and Marc can't deny it !!!!
I just blew his a$$ right out of the water
whites are a LOT more fair than blacks are
obviously blacks vote for race, not common sense/policies/etc

 

[Moonglow]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

the BLACKS/Dems are the racists --obviously
the whites are more fair/equal/unbiased--OBVIOUSLY
picture is worth a thousand words

Your statement only contradicts itself and is a syllogistic fallacy of comparison.

hahahhahahahahhahahahahahahaha
you speak with forked tongue and idiocy
it's RIGHT THERE---you and Marc can't deny it !!!!
I just blew his a$$ right out of the water
whites are a LOT more fair than blacks are
obviously blacks vote for race, not common sense/policies/etc

Whites are more fair to whom?

 

[harmonica]

Why aren't you concerned about how the GOP is like 90% to 95% white?

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

the BLACKS/Dems are the racists --obviously
the whites are more fair/equal/unbiased--OBVIOUSLY
picture is worth a thousand words

Your statement only contradicts itself and is a syllogistic fallacy of comparison.

hahahhahahahahhahahahahahahaha
you speak with forked tongue and idiocy
it's RIGHT THERE---you and Marc can't deny it !!!!
I just blew his a$$ right out of the water
whites are a LOT more fair than blacks are
obviously blacks vote for race, not common sense/policies/etc

Whites are more fair to whom?

it's RIGHT THERE-----93% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
as stated many times--the BLACKS are the RACISTS----more racist

 

[EvilCat Breath]

San Francisco has a medieval structure. There is a very rich class. They live in beautiful homes with clean streets and gardens. There is the very poor that lives in filth. There is no middle class. The workers, the shopkeepers, the servants live outside the city gates. They arrive every morning and go home every evening.

San Francisco is what happens when a city loses its middle class.

 

[Moonglow]

Why aren't you concerned that 95% of blacks vote Democrat? ...

the BLACKS/Dems are the racists --obviously
the whites are more fair/equal/unbiased--OBVIOUSLY
picture is worth a thousand words

Your statement only contradicts itself and is a syllogistic fallacy of comparison.

hahahhahahahahhahahahahahahaha
you speak with forked tongue and idiocy
it's RIGHT THERE---you and Marc can't deny it !!!!
I just blew his a$$ right out of the water
whites are a LOT more fair than blacks are
obviously blacks vote for race, not common sense/policies/etc

Whites are more fair to whom?

it's RIGHT THERE-----93% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
as stated many times--the BLACKS are the RACISTS----more racist

93% of people that vote, hell 50% of the people that can vote do not.

 

[harmonica]

the BLACKS/Dems are the racists --obviously
the whites are more fair/equal/unbiased--OBVIOUSLY
picture is worth a thousand words

Your statement only contradicts itself and is a syllogistic fallacy of comparison.

hahahhahahahahhahahahahahahaha
you speak with forked tongue and idiocy
it's RIGHT THERE---you and Marc can't deny it !!!!
I just blew his a$$ right out of the water
whites are a LOT more fair than blacks are
obviously blacks vote for race, not common sense/policies/etc

Whites are more fair to whom?

it's RIGHT THERE-----93% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
as stated many times--the BLACKS are the RACISTS----more racist

93% of people that vote, hell 50% of the people that can vote do not.

sure --let's use stats that are not even there
hahahahhahahahahaha
typical of libs/blacks/Dems/etc