Democrats Not Happy With Abortion Issue......Now They're Going Too Far Claiming GOP Wants To End Mixed-Marriages

[mudwhistle]

Question:

Why now? Why bring up an issue that has supposedly been settled for over 50 years?

Answer:

The Supreme Court took up this issue because somebody took it before the court.

As usual the left is misleading the public and claiming overturning Roe vs Wade would mean making abortions a crime.
This is not the case.
But their fear tactics in the past have worked and they think that regardless how destructive Democrat policies have been to this country...women voters can be tricked into voting for them in mass.

But now they're going too far.

It's bad enough that they're lying about Roe vs Wade.....but now they're going around asking people about mixed-marriages and same-sex marriages. The New York Times claims that "it's possible" that interracial-marriage is the next target, an outright fabrication.....but leave up to leftists.....they can never let a media created crisis go to waste.

New York Times editorial board suggests some states would still opt to ban interracial marriage

The New York Times editorial board suggested in a piece published Friday that some states "probably wouldn't" permit interracial marriage if they were granted the power to outlaw it.

www.foxnews.com

There's a Silver Lining in all of this.......Democrats are trying to escape Blue States and flood into Red States and repeat the same mistakes they made over and over again like a bunch of locusts. Maybe this will keep some of these folks from leaving the 3rd World mess they created in states like CA and NY. They'll have to live with the destruction they've caused instead of moving elsewhere and doing the same again in a new state.

 

[pknopp]

Interracial? No, Clarence Thomas isn't going to vote to negate his own marriage but same sex marriages? I absolutely could see some going after that.

 

[struth]

Question:

Why now? Why bring up an issue that has supposedly been settled for over 50 years?

Answer:

The Supreme Court took up this issue because somebody took it before the court.

As usual the left is misleading the public and claiming overturning Roe vs Wade would mean making abortions a crime.
This is not the case.
But their fear tactics in the past have worked and they think that regardless how destructive Democrat policies have been to this country...women voters can be tricked into voting for them in mass.

But now they're going too far.

It's bad enough that they're lying about Roe vs Wade.....but now they're going around asking people about mixed-marriages and same-sex marriages. The New York Times claims that "it's possible" that interracial-marriage is the next target, an outright fabrication.....but leave up to leftists.....they can never let a media created crisis go to waste.

New York Times editorial board suggests some states would still opt to ban interracial marriage

The New York Times editorial board suggested in a piece published Friday that some states "probably wouldn't" permit interracial marriage if they were granted the power to outlaw it.

www.foxnews.com

There's a Silver Lining in all of this.......Democrats are trying to escape Blue States and flood into Red States and repeat the same mistakes they made over and over again like a bunch of locusts. Maybe this will keep some of these folks from leaving the 3rd World mess they created in states like CA and NY. They'll have to live with the destruction they've caused instead of moving elsewhere and doing the same again in a new state.

fearmongering and propaganda is all the demafasict have

 

[Polishprince]

Interracial? No, Clarence Thomas isn't going to vote to negate his own marriage but same sex marriages? I absolutely could see some going after that.

Gay Marriage isn't really a marriage- as marriage is a relationship between one man and one broad.

But of course you are right, a lot of prominent Republicans have wives of different races, including Jeb Bush, Sen. McConnell and Ted Cruz.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Draggin for scallops.

 

[whitehall]

That's what dirty tricks democrats do and they get away with it with the cooperation of the mainstream media and the federal bureau of disinformation. Democrats want to stab full term babies in the back of the head and suck out their freaking brains so they change the argument and claim that (ho-hum) republicans are racist.

 

[WEATHER53]

And….and….and…then the outlawing of Afros.

 

[Oddball]

Question:

Why now? Why bring up an issue that has supposedly been settled for over 50 years?

Answer:

The Supreme Court took up this issue because somebody took it before the court.

As usual the left is misleading the public and claiming overturning Roe vs Wade would mean making abortions a crime.
This is not the case.
But their fear tactics in the past have worked and they think that regardless how destructive Democrat policies have been to this country...women voters can be tricked into voting for them in mass.

But now they're going too far.

It's bad enough that they're lying about Roe vs Wade.....but now they're going around asking people about mixed-marriages and same-sex marriages. The New York Times claims that "it's possible" that interracial-marriage is the next target, an outright fabrication.....but leave up to leftists.....they can never let a media created crisis go to waste.

New York Times editorial board suggests some states would still opt to ban interracial marriage

The New York Times editorial board suggested in a piece published Friday that some states "probably wouldn't" permit interracial marriage if they were granted the power to outlaw it.

www.foxnews.com

There's a Silver Lining in all of this.......Democrats are trying to escape Blue States and flood into Red States and repeat the same mistakes they made over and over again like a bunch of locusts. Maybe this will keep some of these folks from leaving the 3rd World mess they created in states like CA and NY. They'll have to live with the destruction they've caused instead of moving elsewhere and doing the same again in a new state.

Need to keep the outrage industry stoked.

 

[pknopp]

Gay Marriage isn't really a marriage-

Not your call.

 

[pknopp]

And….and….and…then the outlawing of Afros.

Schools criticized for bans on dreadlocks, afros

 

[mudwhistle]

That's what dirty tricks democrats do and they get away with it with the cooperation of the mainstream media and the federal bureau of disinformation. Democrats want to stab full term babies in the back of the head and suck out their freaking brains so they change the argument and claim that (ho-hum) republicans are racist.

It goes beyond that. Liz Warren made a claim the other day that they wanted to arrest women who have an accidental or an intentional miscarriage.

Anyone who spread lies like that should be arrested because they're a threat to the public.

 

[Polishprince]

Not your call.

I never thought it was my call.

Its the call of Almighty God who made His opinion on the situation manifest when He put Adam and Eve into the garden instead of Adam and Steve.

 

[jwoodie]

Not your call.

So who's call is it?

 

[jwoodie]

Schools criticized for bans on dreadlocks, afros

"They didn't like my dreads." Does this amount to racial discrimination (at a "predominantly black" school)?

 

[basquebromance]

Interracial? No, Clarence Thomas isn't going to vote to negate his own marriage but same sex marriages? I absolutely could see some going after that.

beat me to it

 

[B. Kidd]

Question:

Why now? Why bring up an issue that has supposedly been settled for over 50 years?

Answer:

The Supreme Court took up this issue because somebody took it before the court.

As usual the left is misleading the public and claiming overturning Roe vs Wade would mean making abortions a crime.
This is not the case.
But their fear tactics in the past have worked and they think that regardless how destructive Democrat policies have been to this country...women voters can be tricked into voting for them in mass.

But now they're going too far.

It's bad enough that they're lying about Roe vs Wade.....but now they're going around asking people about mixed-marriages and same-sex marriages. The New York Times claims that "it's possible" that interracial-marriage is the next target, an outright fabrication.....but leave up to leftists.....they can never let a media created crisis go to waste.

New York Times editorial board suggests some states would still opt to ban interracial marriage

The New York Times editorial board suggested in a piece published Friday that some states "probably wouldn't" permit interracial marriage if they were granted the power to outlaw it.

www.foxnews.com

There's a Silver Lining in all of this.......Democrats are trying to escape Blue States and flood into Red States and repeat the same mistakes they made over and over again like a bunch of locusts. Maybe this will keep some of these folks from leaving the 3rd World mess they created in states like CA and NY. They'll have to live with the destruction they've caused instead of moving elsewhere and doing the same again in a new state.

This Dimm domino theory narrative is full O' shit like all of their slimy narratives.

What else is new??

 

[pknopp]

I never thought it was my call.

Its the call of Almighty God who made His opinion on the situation manifest when He put Adam and Eve into the garden instead of Adam and Steve.

Yep, Adam and Eve, not Adam and Eve and Martha and June and Brenda.

 

[night_son]

Question:

Why now? Why bring up an issue that has supposedly been settled for over 50 years?

Answer:

The Supreme Court took up this issue because somebody took it before the court.

As usual the left is misleading the public and claiming overturning Roe vs Wade would mean making abortions a crime.
This is not the case.
But their fear tactics in the past have worked and they think that regardless how destructive Democrat policies have been to this country...women voters can be tricked into voting for them in mass.

But now they're going too far.

It's bad enough that they're lying about Roe vs Wade.....but now they're going around asking people about mixed-marriages and same-sex marriages. The New York Times claims that "it's possible" that interracial-marriage is the next target, an outright fabrication.....but leave up to leftists.....they can never let a media created crisis go to waste.

New York Times editorial board suggests some states would still opt to ban interracial marriage

The New York Times editorial board suggested in a piece published Friday that some states "probably wouldn't" permit interracial marriage if they were granted the power to outlaw it.

www.foxnews.com

There's a Silver Lining in all of this.......Democrats are trying to escape Blue States and flood into Red States and repeat the same mistakes they made over and over again like a bunch of locusts. Maybe this will keep some of these folks from leaving the 3rd World mess they created in states like CA and NY. They'll have to live with the destruction they've caused instead of moving elsewhere and doing the same again in a new state.

Something the democratic hive mind never could understand is that people are just people, no matter their cultural background, skin color or religious inclination. See, the democrat hive mind refuses to let people be people, be Americans, be just another piece in the American people puzzle. The democrat hive mind thrives on highlighting the physical and cultural and religious differences between groups of people and then exploiting those same differences for political gain. I've lived in the most rural of politically red strongholds where even Cambodian and Iranian American immigrants were treated just like any other redneck who hailed from the area natively. I've also lived in cities like Detroit where official policy of the city government was to practically segregate races from each others' neighborhoods with barbed wire topped fences. In general, traditionally republican held strongholds will allow people of diverse backgrounds to live in peace, so long as they integrate and don't try to change the local way of life. Also in general, democrat held strongholds will go out of their way to highlight the differences between people and stir up trouble between them, constantly and generationally.

Speaking to marriage between a man and a woman, who fucking cares who marries whom? No one, at least not on the political right. As for 'marriage' between two men or two women, that never should have been permitted, not ever and should be ended in America for all of time. I'd say, "Think of the children" but no one seems to care about kids these days, so . . .