Democrats Create Jobs. Trump Incites Violence To Mobs

[Crepitus]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

 

[Deno]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

You are no doubt insane...……………..

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I know, right?

American tech brains choosing Canada

Why Tech Workers And Global Companies Are Choosing Canada

Tech workers are fleeing the United States to work in Canada

Would you want to work here with dangerous and violent Republicans in charge. They cheer assault and murder and lie about everything.

We have a record breaking 7.1 MILLION jobs available and Republicans are too stupid to do those jobs and they work to block companies from bringing in people to do those jobs. You can't force companies to hire stupid people if those stupid people aren't qualified and have no education.
Those companies aren't charities.

Make up your ******* minds...do you want big biz to prosper and expand or do you want American workers to be paid more?
Nobody trying to survive, build a future and improve their quality of life gives two ***** about how big Amazon can get...Personnel and applicant shortages are what drives wages up...we will never see an incline in wages so long as companies have a single file line of potential employees waiting at their door step. Whatever benefits good Americans the most is all that should matter...no?

Big biz has been prospering with record profits since Obama's second year in office. It's the American worker that hasn't. That hasn't changed under the grifter in chief, as big bix profits are even bigger, while the American workers wages are at 1970 levels.

Quantitative easing ..

Bwaaaaaahhhaaaaahhhaaaaaa. OH you mean where uber wealthy liberal people like Warren Buffet and Jeff Bezos could borrow billions dollars to put into their stocks to drive up the price? Did you get to borrow billion dollars at zero percent interest so you too could buy some stock?

An Artificially Inflated Stock Market – CryptoColm – Medium
The Fed Is Not Printing Money, It's Doing Something Much Worse

 

[Crepitus]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

You are no doubt insane...……………..

I understand.

Facts are hard to refute so you resort to insults instead.

It's ok, it's just your nature.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

Oh oh, Craptoshit has come on line. Still trying to rewrite history also.

Fed officials discussed hiking rates to 'restrictive' level

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve officials last month debated how high they should raise interest rates to achieve their economic goals, with some arguing that they might need to lift rates to a level that would modestly restrain growth.

Why the **** would the Fed Reserve Bank need to restrain growth if the economy is slowing down? I have been around a while, and I see this bull shit all the time. The economy starts looking really great under Republican's policies, then the Fed Reserve Chair asshole(put their by a liberal prick, like Obama) decides that the roaring economy of the Republicans needs to be ground to a halt, so then the liberal dickwads like "Blinkie" Pelosi or Dick(the Turban) Durbin, can ***** and moan that a Republican caused the mess. Then the spineless moderates actually believe the leftnutjobs, and votes in the likes of Carter or Obumbler and we get fucked for the time in office with Malaise, until the next Republican gets in. Rinse and repeat. Until people learn history, then history will keep repeating itself...

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

You are no doubt insane...……………..

I understand.

Facts are hard to refute so you resort to insults instead.

It's ok, it's just your nature.

It's ok, it's just your nature

Do you think he/she/it will get the innuendo?

 

[deanrd]

I know, right?

American tech brains choosing Canada

Why Tech Workers And Global Companies Are Choosing Canada

Tech workers are fleeing the United States to work in Canada

Would you want to work here with dangerous and violent Republicans in charge. They cheer assault and murder and lie about everything.

We have a record breaking 7.1 MILLION jobs available and Republicans are too stupid to do those jobs and they work to block companies from bringing in people to do those jobs. You can't force companies to hire stupid people if those stupid people aren't qualified and have no education.
Those companies aren't charities.

Oh so you want to call people stupid now huh ?? Then on the flip side your party wants to bring in hoards of illegal immigrant's, migrant's or refugee immigrant's by the hundreds of thousands, in order to work those jobs only stupid people can work eh ?? Well how many stupid people jobs are out there ?? Got a number ??

Our party doesn't want to bring hoards of illegals anywhere.

Do you always repeat every bullshit talkingpoint you hear?

Looks like the poster was right. Stupid is as stupid does.

Jobs Republicans can’t do. Why? Because they’re stupid.

 

[deanrd]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

Oh oh, Craptoshit has come on line. Still trying to rewrite history also.

Fed officials discussed hiking rates to 'restrictive' level

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve officials last month debated how high they should raise interest rates to achieve their economic goals, with some arguing that they might need to lift rates to a level that would modestly restrain growth.

Why the **** would the Fed Reserve Bank need to restrain growth if the economy is slowing down? I have been around a while, and I see this bull shit all the time. The economy starts looking really great under Republican's policies, then the Fed Reserve Chair asshole(put their by a liberal prick, like Obama) decides that the roaring economy of the Republicans needs to be ground to a halt, so then the liberal dickwads like "Blinkie" Pelosi or Dick(the Turban) Durbin, can ***** and moan that a Republican caused the mess. Then the spineless moderates actually believe the leftnutjobs, and votes in the likes of Carter or Obumbler and we get fucked for the time in office with Malaise, until the next Republican gets in. Rinse and repeat. Until people learn history, then history will keep repeating itself...

You mean so far the economy looks good under Obama’s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry he’ll **** it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it from Clinton. The economy has looked good under Obama‘s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry Trump will **** it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it over from Clinton. And that’s with that Trump will do after he took it over from Obama.

 

[Wyatt earp]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

What do you want Republicans to do pass a law to mandate you to apply for a job?

 

[Wyatt earp]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

Oh oh, Craptoshit has come on line. Still trying to rewrite history also.

Fed officials discussed hiking rates to 'restrictive' level

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve officials last month debated how high they should raise interest rates to achieve their economic goals, with some arguing that they might need to lift rates to a level that would modestly restrain growth.

Why the **** would the Fed Reserve Bank need to restrain growth if the economy is slowing down? I have been around a while, and I see this bull shit all the time. The economy starts looking really great under Republican's policies, then the Fed Reserve Chair asshole(put their by a liberal prick, like Obama) decides that the roaring economy of the Republicans needs to be ground to a halt, so then the liberal dickwads like "Blinkie" Pelosi or Dick(the Turban) Durbin, can ***** and moan that a Republican caused the mess. Then the spineless moderates actually believe the leftnutjobs, and votes in the likes of Carter or Obumbler and we get fucked for the time in office with Malaise, until the next Republican gets in. Rinse and repeat. Until people learn history, then history will keep repeating itself...

You mean so far the economy looks good under Obama’s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry he’ll **** it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it from Clinton. The economy has looked good under Obama‘s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry Trump will **** it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it over from Clinton. And that’s with that Trump will do after he took it over from Obama.

Yea those cash for clunkers policy Obama had created millions of jobs .


.

 

[deanrd]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

What do you want Republicans to do pass a law to mandate you to apply for a job?

Why would Republicans mandate that you apply for a job they aren’t qualified for. Republicans aren’t qualified for hardly anything. Except to ***** and moan about immigrants coming in and taking jobs that republicans could never do. Because Republicans have no education and they don’t know anything about anything.
That’s what happens when you think education is bad for America. You aren’t qualified for anything.

 

[Wyatt earp]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

What do you want Republicans to do pass a law to mandate you to apply for a job?

Why would Republicans mandate that you applied for a job they aren’t qualified for. Republicans aren’t qualified for hardly anything. Except to ***** and moan about immigrants coming in and taking jobs that they could never do. Because Republicans have no education and they don’t know anything about anything.
That’s what happens when you think education is bad for America. You aren’t qualified for anything.

They know how to inflate a tire with out an air pump or air compressor..


Do you?


.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Pretty good job at reverse propaganda just copy and change the names....Sort of like finger pointing...

 

[Dan Stubbs]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

What private sector jobs did Obama create?

Please be specific

He did mention shovels to do something....lol

 

[blackhawk]

Yeah you got to give Democrats credit only they could let something like this happen in order to create jobs.
'SnapCrap' app invites San Francisco residents to report poop on city streets

 

[Wyatt earp]

I am always amazed the left always said Obama created jobs, if he did why did he create them in the redstates???


State unemployment rates, June 2010 : The Economics Daily : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics


State unemployment rates, June 2010
July 23, 2010

Nevada again reported the highest unemployment rate among the States in June, 14.2 percent—a new series high. All region, division, and State series begin in 1976.

[Chart data]

The States with the next highest rates were Michigan, 13.2 percent; California, 12.3 percent; and Rhode Island 12.0 percent.

North Dakota continued to register the lowest job rate, 3.6 percent, followed by South Dakota and Nebraska, 4.5 and 4.8 percent, respectively.



.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I know, right?

American tech brains choosing Canada

Why Tech Workers And Global Companies Are Choosing Canada

Tech workers are fleeing the United States to work in Canada

Would you want to work here with dangerous and violent Republicans in charge. They cheer assault and murder and lie about everything.

We have a record breaking 7.1 MILLION jobs available and Republicans are too stupid to do those jobs and they work to block companies from bringing in people to do those jobs. You can't force companies to hire stupid people if those stupid people aren't qualified and have no education.
Those companies aren't charities.

Make up your ******* minds...do you want big biz to prosper and expand or do you want American workers to be paid more?
Nobody trying to survive, build a future and improve their quality of life gives two ***** about how big Amazon can get...Personnel and applicant shortages are what drives wages up...we will never see an incline in wages so long as companies have a single file line of potential employees waiting at their door step. Whatever benefits good Americans the most is all that should matter...no?

Big biz has been prospering with record profits since Obama's second year in office. It's the American worker that hasn't. That hasn't changed under the grifter in chief, as big bix profits are even bigger, while the American workers wages are at 1970 levels.

Compare the American Worker’s prosperity under Trump vs. Obama? Compared to the two Presidents, under which one are Americans taking home more of their paycheck? Under which President are Ameticans experienced record unemployment?

 

[SmokeALib]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

You left out one fact: Trump isn't your average Republican. Unemployment is at an all-time low. Try again.

 

[007]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

--------------------------

 

[Oldstyle]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Are you judging Trump by what the GOP has done in the past? I hate to point out the obvious but Donald John Trump is unlike any Republican President in modern political history. He's kicking ass and taking names with both the economy and with jobs! If you vote for Democrats in a couple weeks you're voting to put the guys back into power that DIDN'T have a clue how to fix the economy or create jobs! Why would any rational person want to do THAT?