Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Democrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
If the Senate Dems attack ACB then it makes them look bad and the GOP senators who are up for re-election look better by comparison. I'm sure the Dems will try every procedural trick they can think of to slow down the process, but I haven't heard about anything they can do to derail the confirmation. I anticipate some kind of last-minute bullshit, that's their MO but I doubt Graham will let them get away with it.
They refused the consent of the Senate........elections have consequences........just as you lost the election.Democrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
Well the republicans refused to meet with Merrick Garland.
They refused the consent of the Senate........elections have consequences........just as you lost the election.Democrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
Well the republicans refused to meet with Merrick Garland.
Karma........bit you didn't it.
And their vote will be No.......and they will say shame on you............At least it will not be another he raped me skit on SNL like Kav.............They refused the consent of the Senate........elections have consequences........just as you lost the election.Democrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
Well the republicans refused to meet with Merrick Garland.
Karma........bit you didn't it.
They are not worried about it and they shouldn't be, they would vote on her and ask her questions.
I wish Dems would boycott all of humanity so we’d never have to see or listen to them again.
And their vote will be No.......and they will say shame on you............At least it will not be another he raped me skit on SNL like Kav.............They refused the consent of the Senate........elections have consequences........just as you lost the election.Democrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
Well the republicans refused to meet with Merrick Garland.
Karma........bit you didn't it.
They are not worried about it and they shouldn't be, they would vote on her and ask her questions.
35 years ago he abused me...........And you think the people of this country didn't notice..........LOL.........good luck.
I definitely have the type of mind folks would like to be compared too!Who fucking cares, here's what I would do, I'd just have Graham immediately advance her to a vote and dispense with hearings altogether, they just interviewed the women two years ago, everything is in order, just forego the stupid hearings altogether!
We just basically posted the SAME thing at the SAME time, great minds, great minds....
So will you now say the new pick was your lesbian lover in place of the other show put on for Cav......or will you stand aside so the people don't get a rerun of the Kav show..............which will it be................And their vote will be No.......and they will say shame on you............At least it will not be another he raped me skit on SNL like Kav.............They refused the consent of the Senate........elections have consequences........just as you lost the election.Democrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
Well the republicans refused to meet with Merrick Garland.
Karma........bit you didn't it.
They are not worried about it and they shouldn't be, they would vote on her and ask her questions.
35 years ago he abused me...........And you think the people of this country didn't notice..........LOL.........good luck.
Of course as it should be.
So will you now say the new pick was your lesbian lover in place of the other show put on for Cav......or will you stand aside so the people don't get a rerun of the Kav show..............which will it be................And their vote will be No.......and they will say shame on you............At least it will not be another he raped me skit on SNL like Kav.............They refused the consent of the Senate........elections have consequences........just as you lost the election.Democrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
Well the republicans refused to meet with Merrick Garland.
Karma........bit you didn't it.
They are not worried about it and they shouldn't be, they would vote on her and ask her questions.
35 years ago he abused me...........And you think the people of this country didn't notice..........LOL.........good luck.
Of course as it should be.
Tell that to the Dems wanting to circumvent the US Constitution because they lost elections.I wish Dems would boycott all of humanity so we’d never have to see or listen to them again.
Too darn bad, what are you going to do if Biden wins and the Dems win the senate and house!! too bad.
Elections have consequences.
You're a liberal couldn't you enlighten us on your childish peers?I'm not sure what this is suppose to accomplish.
You're a liberal couldn't you enlighten us on your childish peers?I'm not sure what this is suppose to accomplish.
#PackTheCourtDemocrats are reportedly considering a plan to boycott upcoming Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings and at least two Democratic Senators — Hawaii’s Mazie Hirono and Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal — say they will not meet with nominee Amy Coney Barrett because it would “legitimize” President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a nomination process just weeks from a presidential election.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Democratic senators are “mapping out how they will wield their limited procedural weapons in the fight over President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee” and are “grappling with a central question: How much legitimacy do they give his candidate?”
“With little power to actually derail Trump’s pick, Democrats are coming under considerable pressure from their activist base to use every tactic at their disposal to not just throw sand in the gears of the confirmation fight, but to portray the consideration of expected nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a farce that shouldn’t even occur,” the outlet notes.
LOL.
I'm not sure what this is suppose to accomplish.
Fuck these jackasses. Didnt they impeach Trump knowing full well it was bogus?
Schiff lied that he doesnt know who the whistleblower is.
Politicians with power flex. POTUS and senate are the same party. Its not like we dont know the consequences,
RBG should have retired in 2009.Blame her.