Democrats can win if we Offer a new new deal in the mold of FDRs

[SavannahMann]

Social democracy, political ideology that originally advocated a peaceful evolutionary transition of society from capitalism to socialism using established political processes.

social democracy

Somebody needs to suck my smart dick.

I have no doubt that your little head is smarter than your big head. As far as sucking it. I don’t need to floss right now.

But to help you out, you need to read the ENTIRE article you linked to. Dumbass.

After World War II, social democratic parties came to power in several nations of western Europe—e.g., West Germany, Sweden, and Great Britain (in the Labour Party)—and laid the foundations for modern European social welfare programs. With its ascendancy, social democracy changed gradually, most notably in West Germany. These changes generally reflected a moderation of the 19th-century socialist doctrine of wholesale nationalization of business and industry. Although the principles of the various social democratic parties began to diverge somewhat, certain common fundamental principles emerged. In addition to abandoning violence and revolution as tools of social change, social democracy took a stand in opposition to totalitarianism. The Marxist view of democracy as a “bourgeois” facade for class rule was abandoned, and democracy was proclaimed essential for socialist ideals. Increasingly, social democracy adopted the goal of state regulation of business and industry as sufficient to further economic growth and equitable income.

Now, regulation is not control. Regulation is minimum standards for a product. You know, keeping lead paint off of Children’s toys. Things like that. Idiot.

So Social Democracy may have started out one way, but it has evolved and adapted to the real world. Like the Liberatarian party. They used to be in favor of National Ideals, but now they are just another group advocating Globalist propaganda.

You believe the social democrats changed their stripes?


Commies NEVER try to hide their true nature.


You're a naive little twat.

Communists don’t, which is why they detest Social Democrats.

Liberals, like me, find police abuses to be an abomination. We find them intolerable. By Georgia standards, I’m fairly Left Wing. That standard is not universal however.

You ignored every point I made, and resorted to silly name calling. Which of course proves that you have nothing but the most shallow understanding of anything you are ranting about. I’m presuming your little head is not well educated.

Social Democracies do regulate corporations, but they do not control them. Breaking up monopolies has been an American Past time forever. One of the most Conservative Presidents of the 20th Century was Theodore Roosevelt, and he was busting Monopolies like it was a competitive sport. That is Government Regulation. Stimulating competition by ending monopolistic empires. The Robber Barons of the previous Century.

Theodore Roosevelt was chomping at the bit to go to war against the Germans when World War One broke out. He insulted President Wilson regularly for not going to war.

Now, stimulating competition is good for the consumer, look at the break up of Ma Bell if you need more proof. That is regulation. That is not control. History has clearly shown that Government Controlled Corporations always fail. We have hundreds of examples. The British Government stepped in to save the auto industry and created the British Leland group. It hemorrhaged money. It couldn’t break even if they robbed a bank.

Venezuela has state owned oil company, and can’t turn a profit to save their lives. I could go on, and on, and on. But why bother? You’re fixated on your silly definition, and even when your link supports my position, you dance away declaring victory.

I’m assuming that the nurse is going to come an give you your afternoon sedative now, so have a nice Thanksgiving. Remember, you are supposed to eat the turkey, with the big head, not the little one.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Nobody is shaming white men.

Good Dems are shaming bigots and misogynists. They just happen to be mostly white men.

We don’t want their f•••ing votes.

Of course, you define “bigots and misogynists” as anyone who stands for basic standards of decency and morality; and who objects to your side's efforts to force us to accept all manner of perversion, madness, and outright evil.

You don't want our votes, and that's fine with us. That's why your side lost so badly this last election cycle—you willfully alienated mainstream Americans in order to pander to perverts and criminals and other such filth.

 

[bendog]

Nobody is shaming white men.

Good Dems are shaming bigots and misogynists. They just happen to be mostly white men.

We don’t want their f•••ing votes.

Of course, you define “bigots and misogynists” as anyone who stands for basic standards of decency and morality; and who objects to your side's efforts to force us to accept all manner of perversion, madness, and outright evil.

You don't want our votes, and that's fine with us. That's why your side lost so badly this last election cycle—you willfully alienated mainstream Americans in order to pander to perverts and criminals and other such filth.

Dude: Roy Moore.

The OP's got faults, but you got no clue.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Social democracy, political ideology that originally advocated a peaceful evolutionary transition of society from capitalism to socialism using established political processes.

social democracy

Somebody needs to suck my smart dick.

I have no doubt that your little head is smarter than your big head. As far as sucking it. I don’t need to floss right now.

But to help you out, you need to read the ENTIRE article you linked to. Dumbass.

After World War II, social democratic parties came to power in several nations of western Europe—e.g., West Germany, Sweden, and Great Britain (in the Labour Party)—and laid the foundations for modern European social welfare programs. With its ascendancy, social democracy changed gradually, most notably in West Germany. These changes generally reflected a moderation of the 19th-century socialist doctrine of wholesale nationalization of business and industry. Although the principles of the various social democratic parties began to diverge somewhat, certain common fundamental principles emerged. In addition to abandoning violence and revolution as tools of social change, social democracy took a stand in opposition to totalitarianism. The Marxist view of democracy as a “bourgeois” facade for class rule was abandoned, and democracy was proclaimed essential for socialist ideals. Increasingly, social democracy adopted the goal of state regulation of business and industry as sufficient to further economic growth and equitable income.

Now, regulation is not control. Regulation is minimum standards for a product. You know, keeping lead paint off of Children’s toys. Things like that. Idiot.

So Social Democracy may have started out one way, but it has evolved and adapted to the real world. Like the Liberatarian party. They used to be in favor of National Ideals, but now they are just another group advocating Globalist propaganda.

You believe the social democrats changed their stripes?


Commies NEVER try to hide their true nature.


You're a naive little twat.

Communists don’t, which is why they detest Social Democrats.

Liberals, like me, find police abuses to be an abomination. We find them intolerable. By Georgia standards, I’m fairly Left Wing. That standard is not universal however.

You ignored every point I made, and resorted to silly name calling. Which of course proves that you have nothing but the most shallow understanding of anything you are ranting about. I’m presuming your little head is not well educated.

Social Democracies do regulate corporations, but they do not control them. Breaking up monopolies has been an American Past time forever. One of the most Conservative Presidents of the 20th Century was Theodore Roosevelt, and he was busting Monopolies like it was a competitive sport. That is Government Regulation. Stimulating competition by ending monopolistic empires. The Robber Barons of the previous Century.

Theodore Roosevelt was chomping at the bit to go to war against the Germans when World War One broke out. He insulted President Wilson regularly for not going to war.

Now, stimulating competition is good for the consumer, look at the break up of Ma Bell if you need more proof. That is regulation. That is not control. History has clearly shown that Government Controlled Corporations always fail. We have hundreds of examples. The British Government stepped in to save the auto industry and created the British Leland group. It hemorrhaged money. It couldn’t break even if they robbed a bank.

Venezuela has state owned oil company, and can’t turn a profit to save their lives. I could go on, and on, and on. But why bother? You’re fixated on your silly definition, and even when your link supports my position, you dance away declaring victory.

I’m assuming that the nurse is going to come an give you your afternoon sedative now, so have a nice Thanksgiving. Remember, you are supposed to eat the turkey, with the big head, not the little one.

First off, FUCK YOU. You want to compare sheep skins?

Secondly, your belief that Teddy Roosevelt was a "conservative" demonstrates your lack of knowledge. Ever heard of the Bull Moose Party? Hint: that was just the nickname. Guess who was the founder. You don't know cocksucking shit. You should go ahead and shut your uneducated pie hole.

Finally, the key to communist rule is to fuck up language to control the message, which you have attempted here. Regulation is control, just like exclusive possession is ownership. Your fucked up contortion of language does not change the result. Same shit, different label.

Commies are social democrats, and social democrats are commies. You are all fucking commies. It is the same shit with a different fucking label. And, all you goose-stepping pinkos will never give up on your authoritarian quest, until you are exterminated like the thieving cockroaches you are.

 

[SavannahMann]

Social democracy, political ideology that originally advocated a peaceful evolutionary transition of society from capitalism to socialism using established political processes.

social democracy

Somebody needs to suck my smart dick.

I have no doubt that your little head is smarter than your big head. As far as sucking it. I don’t need to floss right now.

But to help you out, you need to read the ENTIRE article you linked to. Dumbass.

After World War II, social democratic parties came to power in several nations of western Europe—e.g., West Germany, Sweden, and Great Britain (in the Labour Party)—and laid the foundations for modern European social welfare programs. With its ascendancy, social democracy changed gradually, most notably in West Germany. These changes generally reflected a moderation of the 19th-century socialist doctrine of wholesale nationalization of business and industry. Although the principles of the various social democratic parties began to diverge somewhat, certain common fundamental principles emerged. In addition to abandoning violence and revolution as tools of social change, social democracy took a stand in opposition to totalitarianism. The Marxist view of democracy as a “bourgeois” facade for class rule was abandoned, and democracy was proclaimed essential for socialist ideals. Increasingly, social democracy adopted the goal of state regulation of business and industry as sufficient to further economic growth and equitable income.

Now, regulation is not control. Regulation is minimum standards for a product. You know, keeping lead paint off of Children’s toys. Things like that. Idiot.

So Social Democracy may have started out one way, but it has evolved and adapted to the real world. Like the Liberatarian party. They used to be in favor of National Ideals, but now they are just another group advocating Globalist propaganda.

You believe the social democrats changed their stripes?


Commies NEVER try to hide their true nature.


You're a naive little twat.

Communists don’t, which is why they detest Social Democrats.

Liberals, like me, find police abuses to be an abomination. We find them intolerable. By Georgia standards, I’m fairly Left Wing. That standard is not universal however.

You ignored every point I made, and resorted to silly name calling. Which of course proves that you have nothing but the most shallow understanding of anything you are ranting about. I’m presuming your little head is not well educated.

Social Democracies do regulate corporations, but they do not control them. Breaking up monopolies has been an American Past time forever. One of the most Conservative Presidents of the 20th Century was Theodore Roosevelt, and he was busting Monopolies like it was a competitive sport. That is Government Regulation. Stimulating competition by ending monopolistic empires. The Robber Barons of the previous Century.

Theodore Roosevelt was chomping at the bit to go to war against the Germans when World War One broke out. He insulted President Wilson regularly for not going to war.

Now, stimulating competition is good for the consumer, look at the break up of Ma Bell if you need more proof. That is regulation. That is not control. History has clearly shown that Government Controlled Corporations always fail. We have hundreds of examples. The British Government stepped in to save the auto industry and created the British Leland group. It hemorrhaged money. It couldn’t break even if they robbed a bank.

Venezuela has state owned oil company, and can’t turn a profit to save their lives. I could go on, and on, and on. But why bother? You’re fixated on your silly definition, and even when your link supports my position, you dance away declaring victory.

I’m assuming that the nurse is going to come an give you your afternoon sedative now, so have a nice Thanksgiving. Remember, you are supposed to eat the turkey, with the big head, not the little one.

First off, FUCK YOU. You want to compare sheep skins?

Secondly, your belief that Teddy Roosevelt was a "conservative" demonstrates your lack of knowledge. Ever heard of the Bull Moose Party? Hint: that was just the nickname. Guess who was the founder. You don't know cocksucking shit. You should go ahead and shut your uneducated pie hole.

Finally, the key to communist rule is to fuck up language to control the message, which you have attempted here. Regulation is control, just like exclusive possession is ownership. Your fucked up contortion of language does not change the result. Same shit, different label.

Commies are social democrats, and social democrats are commies. You are all fucking commies. It is the same shit with a different fucking label. And, all you goose-stepping pinkos will never give up on your authoritarian quest, until you are exterminated like the thieving cockroaches you are.

Well we are in a bit of a mood aren’t we? I literally quoted your own article which clearly stated that they had moved away from control and in favor of regulation. You know like the helmet you wear to protect your noggin? That helmet has to meet specific criteria before it can be sold as a special needs protective device.

The Bull Moose Party was a third party that Roosevelt started to try and get back into the White House after Taft took over when Roosevelt completed his second term. The party was instrumental in splitting the Republican vote and put Wilson into the White House. Fifth grade History for most of us.

Now you are mad because I broke the secret that you have a tiny penis. Well you wrote that I should suck your smart dick. You told us all that you think with the little head, probably why you spend so many lines in each post begging me to have sex with you. I can only assume your inflate a date is punctured again.

Now we all know you aren’t much of a man, but rumor has it that you have a hell of a strap on.

If you are stupid enough to post a link that proves the other posters point don’t blame them for laughing at you.

Now, enjoy your Thanksgiving at the homeless shelter and remember that we care about you. One day society will accept people like you, with the strap on personality.

 

[imawhosure]

Offer a new new deal in the mold of FDRs
Promise to rebuild our middle class with stronger unions, by enforcing our anti-trust laws(yes, we need to break up big media, stop corporations from buying out smaller businesses and make sure small business has a chance), make sure we punish all offshoring of wealth, demand better schools, move forward with rebuilding our infrastructure and promise an America that is for all people.

We need to scream this message loudly on the t.v and we need to drown out the goddamn republicans so they can't control the message. We need to point out how the labor movement of the early 20th century built our middle class and promise outright a better life for peoples children then they ever had slaving away for 10 bucks per hour these past 30 years as the porkers at the top took it all.

If we can do that we have a chance.

Trump won Michigan, Pa and Wis based on his message of I'll do something about your job going over seas. Consider that, Even through he was the snake, he was right as the democrats haven't done crap in the past 35 years to stop it and he was the only one saying it. People voted for him because he had a good message! Democrats also need to make damn sure sure we point out that Trump lied to these people and won't do shit as he said he would.

Incompetent, irrelevant, and a immaterial rant, lol!

1. How is the post office doing? DUMPSTER!

2. How is our debt doing after ALL your spending? DUMPSTER!

3. How is healthcare costs doing after Obysmalcare? DISASTER!

4. How are our schools doing after leftist take over? TERRIBLE!!!!

5. So let us see how your model actually works, with a real life example------------->The mighty MUSTANG RANCH in Nevada, got busted for NOT paying all of its taxes. Yep, that is correct! So what happened?

Well, the government took it over because of tax in arrears, and guess what..........it went BANKRUPT!

So let all of us get this straight, the GOVERNMENT can NOT make a profit, selling beer and hookers to truckers, in the middle of the desert?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! And you want them to control everything?

Sciencerocks, has ROCKS in his head! Hell, they make profits selling beer and hookers in the middle of Manhattan, and your people can't do it with a captive audience, in the middle of a desert! HOW OUT OF TOUCH ARE YOU!

You can NOT show how your fearless leaders can do ANYTHING correctly, except siphon off money from people who do! I would say you are a blithering idiot with your money, except you insist the rest of us pony up cash to invest in your pipe dreams, because YOU are so smart!

Go pound sand, and I bet you will enjoy it-)

 

[Anathema]

Offer a new new deal in the mold of FDRs
Promise to rebuild our middle class with stronger unions, by enforcing our anti-trust laws(yes, we need to break up big media, stop corporations from buying out smaller businesses and make sure small business has a chance), make sure we punish all offshoring of wealth, demand better schools, move forward with rebuilding our infrastructure and promise an America that is for all people.

As someone who literally cannot care any less about economic issues and for whom social issues are paramount, what would this offer us?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Social democracy is FUCKING COMMUNISM!!!

Kill a commie for mommy!

So tax payer supported education and roads is communism. But hell, we know you don't know anything about politics outside of what some fat clown tells you on AM radio.

I bet you couldn't name a single first world country that doesn't have a public sector meaning it is a social democracy. What a joke you're.

Communism doesn't allow for a private sector and doesn't allow for an individual to own property. Of course you're really dumb and wouldn't know this.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Offer a new new deal in the mold of FDRs
Promise to rebuild our middle class with stronger unions, by enforcing our anti-trust laws(yes, we need to break up big media, stop corporations from buying out smaller businesses and make sure small business has a chance), make sure we punish all offshoring of wealth, demand better schools, move forward with rebuilding our infrastructure and promise an America that is for all people.

We need to scream this message loudly on the t.v and we need to drown out the goddamn republicans so they can't control the message. We need to point out how the labor movement of the early 20th century built our middle class and promise outright a better life for peoples children then they ever had slaving away for 10 bucks per hour these past 30 years as the porkers at the top took it all.

If we can do that we have a chance.

Trump won Michigan, Pa and Wis based on his message of I'll do something about your job going over seas. Consider that, Even through he was the snake, he was right as the democrats haven't done crap in the past 35 years to stop it and he was the only one saying it. People voted for him because he had a good message! Democrats also need to make damn sure sure we point out that Trump lied to these people and won't do shit as he said he would.

Incompetent, irrelevant, and a immaterial rant, lol!

1. How is the post office doing? DUMPSTER!

2. How is our debt doing after ALL your spending? DUMPSTER!

3. How is healthcare costs doing after Obysmalcare? DISASTER!

4. How are our schools doing after leftist take over? TERRIBLE!!!!

5. So let us see how your model actually works, with a real life example------------->The mighty MUSTANG RANCH in Nevada, got busted for NOT paying all of its taxes. Yep, that is correct! So what happened?

Well, the government took it over because of tax in arrears, and guess what..........it went BANKRUPT!

So let all of us get this straight, the GOVERNMENT can NOT make a profit, selling beer and hookers to truckers, in the middle of the desert?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! And you want them to control everything?

Sciencerocks, has ROCKS in his head! Hell, they make profits selling beer and hookers in the middle of Manhattan, and your people can't do it with a captive audience, in the middle of a desert! HOW OUT OF TOUCH ARE YOU!

You can NOT show how your fearless leaders can do ANYTHING correctly, except siphon off money from people who do! I would say you are a blithering idiot with your money, except you insist the rest of us pony up cash to invest in your pipe dreams, because YOU are so smart!

Go pound sand, and I bet you will enjoy it-)

Exactly. How well is our Social Security system holding up? What about our Medicaid system? What about our Medicare system? What about Amtrak? What about the DC cafeteria where our politicians dine?

There are some things that government can do well.......and even that is debatable. But for most things, government is a failure.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Social democracy, political ideology that originally advocated a peaceful evolutionary transition of society from capitalism to socialism using established political processes.

social democracy

Somebody needs to suck my smart dick.

I have no doubt that your little head is smarter than your big head. As far as sucking it. I don’t need to floss right now.

But to help you out, you need to read the ENTIRE article you linked to. Dumbass.

After World War II, social democratic parties came to power in several nations of western Europe—e.g., West Germany, Sweden, and Great Britain (in the Labour Party)—and laid the foundations for modern European social welfare programs. With its ascendancy, social democracy changed gradually, most notably in West Germany. These changes generally reflected a moderation of the 19th-century socialist doctrine of wholesale nationalization of business and industry. Although the principles of the various social democratic parties began to diverge somewhat, certain common fundamental principles emerged. In addition to abandoning violence and revolution as tools of social change, social democracy took a stand in opposition to totalitarianism. The Marxist view of democracy as a “bourgeois” facade for class rule was abandoned, and democracy was proclaimed essential for socialist ideals. Increasingly, social democracy adopted the goal of state regulation of business and industry as sufficient to further economic growth and equitable income.

Now, regulation is not control. Regulation is minimum standards for a product. You know, keeping lead paint off of Children’s toys. Things like that. Idiot.

So Social Democracy may have started out one way, but it has evolved and adapted to the real world. Like the Liberatarian party. They used to be in favor of National Ideals, but now they are just another group advocating Globalist propaganda.

You believe the social democrats changed their stripes?


Commies NEVER try to hide their true nature.


You're a naive little twat.

Communists don’t, which is why they detest Social Democrats.

Liberals, like me, find police abuses to be an abomination. We find them intolerable. By Georgia standards, I’m fairly Left Wing. That standard is not universal however.

You ignored every point I made, and resorted to silly name calling. Which of course proves that you have nothing but the most shallow understanding of anything you are ranting about. I’m presuming your little head is not well educated.

Social Democracies do regulate corporations, but they do not control them. Breaking up monopolies has been an American Past time forever. One of the most Conservative Presidents of the 20th Century was Theodore Roosevelt, and he was busting Monopolies like it was a competitive sport. That is Government Regulation. Stimulating competition by ending monopolistic empires. The Robber Barons of the previous Century.

Theodore Roosevelt was chomping at the bit to go to war against the Germans when World War One broke out. He insulted President Wilson regularly for not going to war.

Now, stimulating competition is good for the consumer, look at the break up of Ma Bell if you need more proof. That is regulation. That is not control. History has clearly shown that Government Controlled Corporations always fail. We have hundreds of examples. The British Government stepped in to save the auto industry and created the British Leland group. It hemorrhaged money. It couldn’t break even if they robbed a bank.

Venezuela has state owned oil company, and can’t turn a profit to save their lives. I could go on, and on, and on. But why bother? You’re fixated on your silly definition, and even when your link supports my position, you dance away declaring victory.

I’m assuming that the nurse is going to come an give you your afternoon sedative now, so have a nice Thanksgiving. Remember, you are supposed to eat the turkey, with the big head, not the little one.

First off, FUCK YOU. You want to compare sheep skins?

Secondly, your belief that Teddy Roosevelt was a "conservative" demonstrates your lack of knowledge. Ever heard of the Bull Moose Party? Hint: that was just the nickname. Guess who was the founder. You don't know cocksucking shit. You should go ahead and shut your uneducated pie hole.

Finally, the key to communist rule is to fuck up language to control the message, which you have attempted here. Regulation is control, just like exclusive possession is ownership. Your fucked up contortion of language does not change the result. Same shit, different label.

Commies are social democrats, and social democrats are commies. You are all fucking commies. It is the same shit with a different fucking label. And, all you goose-stepping pinkos will never give up on your authoritarian quest, until you are exterminated like the thieving cockroaches you are.

Well we are in a bit of a mood aren’t we? I literally quoted your own article which clearly stated that they had moved away from control and in favor of regulation. You know like the helmet you wear to protect your noggin? That helmet has to meet specific criteria before it can be sold as a special needs protective device.

The Bull Moose Party was a third party that Roosevelt started to try and get back into the White House after Taft took over when Roosevelt completed his second term. The party was instrumental in splitting the Republican vote and put Wilson into the White House. Fifth grade History for most of us.

Now you are mad because I broke the secret that you have a tiny penis. Well you wrote that I should suck your smart dick. You told us all that you think with the little head, probably why you spend so many lines in each post begging me to have sex with you. I can only assume your inflate a date is punctured again.

Now we all know you aren’t much of a man, but rumor has it that you have a hell of a strap on.

If you are stupid enough to post a link that proves the other posters point don’t blame them for laughing at you.

Now, enjoy your Thanksgiving at the homeless shelter and remember that we care about you. One day society will accept people like you, with the strap on personality.

The Bull Moose party was the nickname of The Progressive Party, which is a rebrand of communism.

The social democrats (commies) shifted from controlling the corps to regulating, because calling it "control" was too unpopular. The goal and result is still the same.

Now, I' m done talking to your ignorant, commie ass.

 

[SavannahMann]

I have no doubt that your little head is smarter than your big head. As far as sucking it. I don’t need to floss right now.

But to help you out, you need to read the ENTIRE article you linked to. Dumbass.

Now, regulation is not control. Regulation is minimum standards for a product. You know, keeping lead paint off of Children’s toys. Things like that. Idiot.

So Social Democracy may have started out one way, but it has evolved and adapted to the real world. Like the Liberatarian party. They used to be in favor of National Ideals, but now they are just another group advocating Globalist propaganda.

You believe the social democrats changed their stripes?


Commies NEVER try to hide their true nature.


You're a naive little twat.

Communists don’t, which is why they detest Social Democrats.

Liberals, like me, find police abuses to be an abomination. We find them intolerable. By Georgia standards, I’m fairly Left Wing. That standard is not universal however.

You ignored every point I made, and resorted to silly name calling. Which of course proves that you have nothing but the most shallow understanding of anything you are ranting about. I’m presuming your little head is not well educated.

Social Democracies do regulate corporations, but they do not control them. Breaking up monopolies has been an American Past time forever. One of the most Conservative Presidents of the 20th Century was Theodore Roosevelt, and he was busting Monopolies like it was a competitive sport. That is Government Regulation. Stimulating competition by ending monopolistic empires. The Robber Barons of the previous Century.

Theodore Roosevelt was chomping at the bit to go to war against the Germans when World War One broke out. He insulted President Wilson regularly for not going to war.

Now, stimulating competition is good for the consumer, look at the break up of Ma Bell if you need more proof. That is regulation. That is not control. History has clearly shown that Government Controlled Corporations always fail. We have hundreds of examples. The British Government stepped in to save the auto industry and created the British Leland group. It hemorrhaged money. It couldn’t break even if they robbed a bank.

Venezuela has state owned oil company, and can’t turn a profit to save their lives. I could go on, and on, and on. But why bother? You’re fixated on your silly definition, and even when your link supports my position, you dance away declaring victory.

I’m assuming that the nurse is going to come an give you your afternoon sedative now, so have a nice Thanksgiving. Remember, you are supposed to eat the turkey, with the big head, not the little one.

First off, FUCK YOU. You want to compare sheep skins?

Secondly, your belief that Teddy Roosevelt was a "conservative" demonstrates your lack of knowledge. Ever heard of the Bull Moose Party? Hint: that was just the nickname. Guess who was the founder. You don't know cocksucking shit. You should go ahead and shut your uneducated pie hole.

Finally, the key to communist rule is to fuck up language to control the message, which you have attempted here. Regulation is control, just like exclusive possession is ownership. Your fucked up contortion of language does not change the result. Same shit, different label.

Commies are social democrats, and social democrats are commies. You are all fucking commies. It is the same shit with a different fucking label. And, all you goose-stepping pinkos will never give up on your authoritarian quest, until you are exterminated like the thieving cockroaches you are.

Well we are in a bit of a mood aren’t we? I literally quoted your own article which clearly stated that they had moved away from control and in favor of regulation. You know like the helmet you wear to protect your noggin? That helmet has to meet specific criteria before it can be sold as a special needs protective device.

The Bull Moose Party was a third party that Roosevelt started to try and get back into the White House after Taft took over when Roosevelt completed his second term. The party was instrumental in splitting the Republican vote and put Wilson into the White House. Fifth grade History for most of us.

Now you are mad because I broke the secret that you have a tiny penis. Well you wrote that I should suck your smart dick. You told us all that you think with the little head, probably why you spend so many lines in each post begging me to have sex with you. I can only assume your inflate a date is punctured again.

Now we all know you aren’t much of a man, but rumor has it that you have a hell of a strap on.

If you are stupid enough to post a link that proves the other posters point don’t blame them for laughing at you.

Now, enjoy your Thanksgiving at the homeless shelter and remember that we care about you. One day society will accept people like you, with the strap on personality.

The Bull Moose party was the nickname of The Progressive Party, which is a rebrand of communism.

The social democrats (commies) shifted from controlling the corps to regulating, because calling it "control" was too unpopular. The goal and result is still the same.

Now, I' m done talking to your ignorant, commie ass.

Yeah. Because breaking up monopolies is exactly what communism is all about. Idiot.

You are as full of shit as the anti gun nuts. They say militia means national guard. It didn’t When the Amendment was written. But that is what it means today they argue.

Progressive means communist todayyou argue. It doesn’t. But even if it did. It didn’t then. Moron.

I’ll give you a point on one thing. You finally typed a reply where you didn’t declare your insatiable desire to have sex with me. Managed to fix the inflate adage did you?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Offer a new new deal in the mold of FDRs
Promise to rebuild our middle class with stronger unions, by enforcing our anti-trust laws(yes, we need to break up big media, stop corporations from buying out smaller businesses and make sure small business has a chance), make sure we punish all offshoring of wealth, demand better schools, move forward with rebuilding our infrastructure and promise an America that is for all people.

We need to scream this message loudly on the t.v and we need to drown out the goddamn republicans so they can't control the message. We need to point out how the labor movement of the early 20th century built our middle class and promise outright a better life for peoples children then they ever had slaving away for 10 bucks per hour these past 30 years as the porkers at the top took it all.

If we can do that we have a chance.

Trump won Michigan, Pa and Wis based on his message of I'll do something about your job going over seas. Consider that, Even through he was the snake, he was right as the democrats haven't done crap in the past 35 years to stop it and he was the only one saying it. People voted for him because he had a good message! Democrats also need to make damn sure sure we point out that Trump lied to these people and won't do shit as he said he would.

I don't think any policy will actually be implemented that raises consumer prices. Note that Trump hasn't actually done jack shit to make imports more expensive. And if he did, his support would tank even more.

What liberals proposed, with Krugman being in the lead, was to raise taxes on the wealthy to improve workers access to education and healthcare. Obama and the dems failed to fully follow through because during the height of the recession some thought that if taxes were raised any more on capital the econ could tank even more. However, that was erroneous in that the rich recovered quite quickly and are doing even better. And the dems faint-heartedness led to the OWS and misguided econ populism of Berine's "free shit for us all."

was to raise taxes on the wealthy to improve workers access to education and healthcare

And we continue to have failed rates out of public education, and healthcare increasing on the middle class by 200%. Fucking liberals love to FORCE the rest of US to be miserable and poor, for then we are all equal..