Democrats Being Democrats

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1.Call them Progressives, Liberals, Socialists, ….they’re Democrats. Big picture, the terms Bolsheviks and Communists apply as well.

Whittaker Chambers wrote in his book WITNESS that liberals are/were incapable of ever effectively fighting Communism because they did not see anything in Communism that was antithetical to their own beliefs. In short, Liberals are Communists and Communists are Liberals. The informed Democrat is aware of the horrors of Communism; the tortures, the Gulags, the over 100 million persons done to death. And is even aware that the American Communists were taking their orders from Moscow and were attempting to impose the Red Utopia upon the United States. If successful, this would have led to millions tortured, enslaved, starved and murdered. It would have led to the death of human freedom for untold years. As the US was the bulwarked of freedom and Democracy, it's communization would have turned the entire world into an abattoir.

But….they continue to vote Democrat.



2. Central to the indictment above is the fact that Democrat godfather Franklin Roosevelt warmly embraced mass murderer Joseph Stalin, and he made certain that Soviet Communism survived the war, and found a comfortable home in America. FDR knew of the Terror Famine...yet he enveloped Joe Stalin in " the cloak of his popularity..." Time Magazine, December 17, 1934.

He was so popular that he could dictate....that's the operative term....to the Democrat Party. He threatened the party that if a communist was not selected as his (second) vice-president, he would not run for office.

a. "Even with FDR’s endorsement (and his threat to withdraw from the presidential race if Wallace were not chosen by the Democratic convention), Wallace won by only 628 to 459…Wallace was not allowed to give an acceptance speech."
FDR, Stalin, and Oliver Stone - The New York Sun
Clearly this was prior to the Democrat Party becoming a proxy for the Communist Party.




3. Jump to Lon Nol….who died on this date in 1985. “As a nationalist and conservative, he led the military coup of 1970 against Prince Norodom Sihanouk, abolished the monarchy, and established the short-lived Khmer Republic.”

Lon Nol, (born Nov. 13, 1913, Prey Vêng, Cambodia—died Nov. 17, 1985, Fullerton, Calif., U.S.), soldier and politician whose overthrow of Prince Norodom Sihanouk (1970) involved Cambodia in the Indochina war and ended in the takeover (1975) of the country by the communist Khmer Rouge. Britannica.com



4. In the long and bloody history of the Democrat Party supporting the efforts of global communism, perhaps you’ve learned about the ‘Utopia’ that Communist Pol Pot brought to his nation.

Starting in April ’75, the Communist Khmer Rouge defeated Lon Nol in Cambodia. Democrats, starting with the 1974 budget, refused to allocate another penny, and forbade US military action “in or over” Indochina. Just as the right had warned, the communists began a systematic war on the entire populations of their nation, so savage, it is hard to comprehend. It is estimated that the number of dead numbered between 1.7 to 2.5 million out of a population of around 8 million.
Killing Fields - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


5. The characteristic most common between the Democrats and the Communist is the disregard for human life.
 
Last edited:
Conservatives gather
em201114001_custom-29b5cade1a115a14eab6877fc36d768a1aea2593-s700-c85.jpg
Democrats gather
PW6WSFIK647K3MOH4K2OA7XZHA.jpg
See the difference?
 
6. In “Sideshow,” William Shawcross claims that the 1970 bombings caused the coup in which Prince Sihanouk was by Lon Nol. But this adumbrates the issues, as Sihanouk attempted to be too clever, allowing the Vietnamese to invade his country, and then telling Kissinger he could bomb them.
The North Vietnamese were getting support from the Soviet Union and China, determined to support wars of “national liberation.”


In 1994, Shawcross acknowledged his error: “Those of us who opposed the American war in Indochina should be extremely humble in the face of the appalling aftermath: a form of genocide in Cambodia and horrific tyranny in both Vietnam and Laos. Looking back on my own coverage for The Sunday Times...,I think I concentrated too easily on the corruption and incompetence of the South Vietnamese and their American allies, was too ignorant of the inhuman Hanoi regime, and far too willing to believe that a victory by the Communists would provide a better future. But after the Communist victory came the refugees to Thailand and the floods of boat people desperately seeking to escape the Cambodian killing fields and the Vietnamese gulags. Their eloquent testimony should have put paid to all illusions.” http://www.williamshawcross.com/index.php?page=killing


The Democrat Party is the party of Death.
 
6. In “Sideshow,” William Shawcross claims that the 1970 bombings caused the coup in which Prince Sihanouk was by Lon Nol. But this adumbrates the issues, as Sihanouk attempted to be too clever, allowing the Vietnamese to invade his country, and then telling Kissinger he could bomb them.
The North Vietnamese were getting support from the Soviet Union and China, determined to support wars of “national liberation.”


In 1994, Shawcross acknowledged his error: “Those of us who opposed the American war in Indochina should be extremely humble in the face of the appalling aftermath: a form of genocide in Cambodia and horrific tyranny in both Vietnam and Laos. Looking back on my own coverage for The Sunday Times...,I think I concentrated too easily on the corruption and incompetence of the South Vietnamese and their American allies, was too ignorant of the inhuman Hanoi regime, and far too willing to believe that a victory by the Communists would provide a better future. But after the Communist victory came the refugees to Thailand and the floods of boat people desperately seeking to escape the Cambodian killing fields and the Vietnamese gulags. Their eloquent testimony should have put paid to all illusions.” http://www.williamshawcross.com/index.php?page=killing


The Democrat Party is the party of Death.
Yeah, tell that to the American Native Americans and try to convince them of that.
 
7. Everyone has seen the handiwork of the Democrat version of archangels, ANTIFA, and BLM.....


For a much clearer picture of what a Democrat/Bolshevik future holds in hand for society, see what their minions did when the Democrat Party facilitated their take-over of Cambodia:

a. Frequently found in totalitarian death cults, the Khmer Rouge cadres were mostly teenagers, some as young as ten or twelve, produced by cruelty and indoctrination. Consistent with other communist conquests, the Khmer Rouge began the massive and grotesque project of remaking society from scratch. They began by emptying the cities: every single person in Phnom Penh- including the lame, hospital patients on intravenous drips, the sick and the elderly, mothers who had just given birth, the pregnant, and infants, - everyone was forced to march.
Khmer Rouge rule of Cambodia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


b. “The pedicab did not move to the side of the road so a soldier killed the driver with machine gun fire….A young soldier thrust his rifle through the window of the car, then shot the driver through the heart, and he crumpled in the arms of his wife…”I’m going to pick up my family,” Without warning, a soldier sprayed him with machine gun bullets….The frantic parents protested and sought to reclaim their children on the other side of the communist column. The patrol leader thereupon fired a volley of rifle shots, killing both mother and father.”
Barron and Paul, “Murder of a Gentle Land, “ p.26-28.


c. Later, to save bullets, the Khmer Rouge switched to other methods of execution, including clubbing, asphyxiation, and dousing the head with gasoline and setting it on fire.
Courtois, et.al., “The Black Book of Communism,” p. 611



Many government school students can see the similarity between Pol Pot and Hitler, yet somehow the horror of Communist control is hidden, or mollified, while the principles of Leftism is imposed on the captive audience.
 

Forum List

Back
Top