Once in a while democrats accept reality

[WEATHER53]

But it’s been a while. When might the next awhile occur?
Let’s see if what’s good for a goose started thread is compatible to when a gander does the same . History says No.

 

[gipper]

Yet there is little difference between the two crime families. So anything the Ds are guilty of, it’s likely are Rs are too.

 

[Alicia J]

But it’s been a while. When might the next awhile occur?
Let’s see if what’s good for a goose started thread is compatible to when a gander does the same . History says No.

That's good....because mentally ill MAGA Republican traitors never accept reality.

Trump lost the 2020 election and MAGA imbeciles still can't accept this fundamental fact.

 

[Manonthestreet]

That's good....because mentally ill MAGA Republican traitors never accept reality.

Trump lost the 2020 election and MAGA imbeciles still can't accept this fundamental fact.

If you think Joe was dealing with reality you should get yourself tested

 

[Alicia J]

If you think Joe was dealing with reality you should get yourself tested

Biden didn't start a disastrous war with Iran and get bent over a table by Iran without any lube....like Trump did.

That's good enough for me.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Biden didn't start a disastrous war with Iran and get bent over a table by Iran without any lube....like Trump did.

That's good enough for me.

It ain't over if ya read the news this morning.......oooooops

 

[berg80]

Here's one reality I've accepted.

The Question Inside Trump's White House Wasn't Whether They Could Suspend Rights—It Was Whether They Could Get Away With It​

The headline read “Frustrated by Courts, Trump Weighed Suspending a Constitutional Right.” It teased the story like this: “Secret memos show that the White House debated last year, to a greater degree than previously known, whether to limit habeas corpus rights for undocumented immigrants.”

What follows is an outrageous attempt, even though it ultimately failed, at least for now, to shatter firmly established constitutional rights and protections. In sharing this story, The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan are giving us a peek at their forthcoming book. Leaving aside, for the moment, the inevitable debate over whether journalists have an obligation to report in real time as opposed to holding their most interesting revelations for later publication, their reporting in this story puts together some previously known or suspected information with new details to provide detailed support for understanding this administration as a threat to democratic ideals.

The Question Inside Trump's White House Wasn't Whether They Could Suspend Rights—It Was Whether They Could Get Away With It

The headline read “Frustrated by Courts, Trump Weighed Suspending a Constitutional Right.” It teased the story like this: “Secret memos show that the White House debated last year, to a greater degree than previously known, whether to limit habeas corpus rights for undocumented immigrants.”

joycevance.substack.com

That is, no constitutional violation is too egregious for this regime to consider.

 

[Alicia J]

It ain't over if ya read the news this morning.......oooooops

The damage has already been done. Trump's idiocy has now made Iran a more powerful country going forward, endangering our national security even more.

You really aren't very bright.

 

[Mac1958]

The damage has already been done. Trump's idiocy has now made Iran a more powerful country going forward, endangering our national security even more.

Not to mention the other global damage he's caused, but we're not supposed to care about that.