Democrats! are you not ashamed?...

You are being dismissive of objective facts from an unbiased data source.

Let that sink in.
AI isn't objective.

AI recognizes you and knows the kinds of answers you like to hear.

I mean, as soon as they can put CoPilot into a Japanese Sex Robot, I'm sure you'll be set
 
The objective fact in life and law is that the fetus depends on the host mother for status. It has no independent standing of its own. You can't provide it. "In utero" means it is dependent on the host mother.
Already refuted by the fact that a woman can be and several have been prosecuted for crimes even against their own prenatal child/ children.
 
AI isn't objective.

AI recognizes you and knows the kinds of answers you like to hear.

I mean, as soon as they can put CoPilot into a Japanese Sex Robot, I'm sure you'll be set

1. I intentionally wasn't signed in, so it had NO idea who I was.

2. So cut and paste the same ******* question into any other search engine (they are all AI anymore) and then post the results with a link so we can compare the two.
 
Um, no.

I think it was wrong for the Nazis to murder the Jews.
I think it is wrong for the Zionists to murder the Palestinians.

I'm the only one with a consistent moral compass.

Um, yes. You've made it clear from other posts in the past that you hate Jews.
 
The objective fact in life and law is that the fetus depends on the host mother for status. It has no independent standing of its own. You can't provide it. "In utero" means it is dependent on the host mother.
Which in reality simply means it must rely on another for the ability to remain alive.

So, this would, using your deranged logic, a mother would have the right to kill a child before it reached the age to fend for itself.

Do we have that right?
 
Now, consider how hard it must be to justify murder. Then the murder of the most defenseless of human beings, and you will see exactly where their mental illness comes into play!
Oh I know.

I've been dealing with them for decades.
 
Which in reality simply means it must rely on another for the ability to remain alive.

So, this would, using your deranged logic, a mother would have the right to kill a child before it reached the age to fend for itself.

Do we have that right?
Where do you make that leap of illogic?
 
The fetus. It's not a child yet, not a baby. You can never get around the few mess of cells beginning.

1781235094738.webp


Who is she the MOTHER of?
 
Norm and Chuz simply cannot find the logic to get around the fact the fetus is not independent and thus depends on the host for its existence. End of story. No need to argue with them anymore.
 
View attachment 1268294

Who is she the MOTHER of?

You know what is strange in this whole debate.

The left is reliant on the legal principle of “similarly situated”. But not when it comes to abortion.

There simply is no logic with people that are so full of hate that they would kill the most defenseless human being.

I think they would have enjoyed being guards at German concentration camps. Especially those in charge of the gas chambers.
 
15th post
Norm and Chuz simply cannot find the logic to get around the fact the fetus is not independent and thus depends on the host for its existence. End of story. No need to argue with them anymore.

And neither is a child until they can fend for themselves.

You’re leaving because I’ve completely obliterated your argument and you have to come to grips with your ugly hatred.
 
You know what is strange in this whole debate.

The left is reliant on the legal principle of “similarly situated”. But not when it comes to abortion.

There simply is no logic with people that are so full of hate that they would kill the most defenseless human being.

I think they would have enjoyed being guards at German concentration camps. Especially those in charge of the gas chambers.
They clearly want us (especially MAGA) in those chambers.
 
The objective fact in life and law is that the fetus depends on the host mother for status. It has no independent standing of its own. You can't provide it. "In utero" means it is dependent on the host mother.
A baby... an infant depends on the host mother for survival and to be able to have "standing" of its own...
jacksonlamb you are speaking gibberish....
 
The objective fact in life and law is that the fetus depends on the host mother for status.
"status"? what kind(s) of "status" are there?...and that claim is more subjective than objective
It has no independent standing of its own
what kind of "standing" does it have with the mother?
You can't provide it.
so to describe it [give it standing] as merely a clump of tissue or cells would be a lie?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom