Democrats are concerned that they cannot win in enough states to maintain a viable electoral future

[Mac1958]

The assumption is being made that things are going to go just swimmingly for the next two years.

Both parties make that dumb mistake every time they're in control.

Hubris.

 

[JoeB131]

The assumption is being made that things are going to go just swimmingly for the next two years.

Both parties make that dumb mistake every time they're in control.

Hubris.

Hey, Mac, how did your centrist hero Eric Adams work out?

Because I remember you gushing over him when he won the convoluted primary in 2021.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Yes, those dead and starving people on the planet will be given a dose of reality when foodstuffs are not handed out..

The Department of the State will take care of that.
For you, there is no hope.

 

[LibtardGFY]

The loss of their USAID DEEP STATE SLUSH FUND is going to be a DEVASTATING blow for the demented LEFT.

Spot on.

The GOP will play this like a card game. 2025 will have leaks, but its the primary time for gathering evidence. 2026 is when the GOP starts laying out the ways that Democrats have stolen taxpayer money and where it ended up. Democrats are fvcked for the midterms. Trump was brilliant in finding his very own George Soros in Elon who is also smarter than every Democrat combined.

 

[Dekster]

The democrats are dead; the GOP is dead; rinse and repeat.

 

[Blaster]

Liberalism is dying a slow death.

 

[DonGlock26]

One thing I have never understood is the term "Democrats (or Republicans) will run this person". For the most part, the party doesn't decide who is running, the individual candidates decide who is running or who is not. Then, the party hierarchy doesn't decide who wins and who loses, the primary voters do. This is my long way of saying that I don't think Kamala Harris will be the nominee for the reasons I just stated. And, yes, in 2024 the party hierarchy did decide to run Kamala Harris, not the voters.

You've never heard of the Democrat Party's undemocratic "superdelegates"?
Let me just say that the Democrat Party leaders pick their candidates. The GOP has to
accept who is selected by the primary voters. If the elite Republican has "superdelegates", Trump would have never been selected.

 

[DonGlock26]

Liberalism is dying a slow death.

I hope it is extremely painful as well.

 

[Independent thinker]

You've never heard of the Democrat Party's undemocratic "superdelegates"?
Let me just say that the Democrat Party leaders pick their candidates. The GOP has to
accept who is selected by the primary voters. If the elite Republican has "superdelegates", Trump would have never been selected.

But they changed the superdelegate thing several years ago.

 

[scruffy]

That’s why they are losing their shit. The media is being dismantled as well

CNN is charging you to read their bullshit now

 

[AntonToo]

They are the party of left wing elites now. They cannot change this. The Dems will probably run Kamala again.

Trump lost one of those elections and will never run again.

Whats this thread about?

 

[DonGlock26]

Trump lost one of those elections and will never run again.

Whats this thread about?

Um, read the title and OP.

 

[DonGlock26]

CNN is charging you to read their bullshit now

The death spiral has begun.

 

[DonGlock26]

But they changed the superdelegate thing several years ago.

They were back by 2024.

"Automatic delegates or "superdelegates," such as Democratic governors, members of Congress and former presidents, also have a vote in the signature threshold and the roll call process. The DNC says because Harris got the verified support of a majority of pledged delegates, the votes of both pledged delegates and superdelegates will count on the first ballot of the virtual roll call."

The DNC's virtual roll call to nominate Kamala Harris started Aug. 1. Here's how the vote works.

Democratic delegates are voting virtually to select their new nominee and formally elevate Vice President Kamala Harris to the top of the ticket.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Mashmont]

They are the party of left wing elites now. They cannot change this. The Dems will probably run Kamala again.

I posted something similar;

M

Thread 'GOP has cemented it's lock on the Senate for decades to come'

Dec 6, 2024

https://thehill.com/opinion/5022750-democratic-party-senate-loss/

Right now it's 53 to 47, and it can only go up from there.

It's simple math, people. There are a lot more red states than blue. And with the flipping of Democrat seats in Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, the transformation is irreversible. Democrats can't win in these red states because they are not in power to steal elections. There are now NO Democrat senators in red states, and the seven swing states are still up for grabs. Should the Republicans sweep all those states, their majority...

• Mashmont
• Replies: 51
• Forum: Election 2024

• 
• 
• 

 

[Mashmont]

Let's get real, it's ebb and flow, buddy.

Next midterms, you are going to see Democrats win in places they never won before, and be shocked.

By 2028, Trump will have screwed things up so bad, the GOP will be running from him.

Let's see. Reduced spending and tax cuts. The recipe of economic booms.

 

[JoeB131]

Let's see. Reduced spending and tax cuts. The recipe of economic booms.

Tax cuts never help the economy.

Neither does reduced spending.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The main problem with the dem Party is they weren't Left enough, they were trying to be coy and it turned off moderates and sane people. They need to move further Left and not be shy about it

 

[Godboy]

They are the party of left wing elites now. They cannot change this. The Dems will probably run Kamala again.

Democrats can win elections again. All they have to do is sellout ALL of the ideals that they've lectured the nation about for a decade straight. They have to completely ditch their previous principles as if they never mattered. Thats all they have to do. They just have to become total sellouts. Easy peasy.

 

[Mashmont]

Tax cuts never help the economy.

Neither does reduced spending.

Reagan 80s. tax cuts -economic boom. GOP Congress late 90s less spending and tax cuts -economic boom. Bush tax cuts early 00s -economic boom. Trump late 10s - tax cuts -economic boom. All economic booms. How much more evidence do you need?