Democrat Position On Racism

It alternates between rage and narcissism.
Check the DSM on BPD for a hint on the fear of abandonment.



I'm kinda satisfied with this. How about you?

... you're a Marxist.
By definition an atheist and by admission, in favor of genocide and censorship.

In short.....the lowest of the low, an enemy of mankind and of civilization.

You probably hear that a lot.
 
I'm kinda satisfied with this. How about you?

... you're a Marxist.
By definition an atheist and by admission, in favor of genocide and censorship.

In short.....the lowest of the low, an enemy of mankind and of civilization.

You probably hear that a lot.
It's the second time I've heard it from you hon. Now it's time to remind me of your greatness again.
 
Well.....they're for it.

Always have been.....but the dumbest among us vote for Democrats because they hate racism??????


1. There are only three things important to the Democrat program, agenda.....Race, Class, and Gender.
Not liberty, not religious freedom, not prosperity, not individuality, not tranquility.
Race, Class, and Gender.

“Cultural Marxism, though it’s dismissed by critics as a “term invented by the Right”, “was an undeniable school of thought taking Marxist categories of oppressed and oppressor beyond the economic realm and applying to it other forms of oppression: gender, race, sexuality.”
Caldron Pool



2. “A hundred years ago, kids in classrooms were taught the color of their skin was their most important characteristic — and if they looked a certain way, they were inferior. Today, kids again are being taught that the color of their skin defines them — and if they look a certain way, they’re an oppressor.” Tim Scott Text of Sen. Tim Scott's GOP response to Biden speech


3.




4.

View attachment 593866


View attachment 593867
View attachment 593868




5. Memo to the Democrat Party:

View attachment 593870

Biden's dimwitted search for a new justice for the supreme court is blatant RACISM. If an employer were to place a help wanted ad in the paper framed in the same way he would be tared and feathered by Biden and his corrupt followers. Stand up on your two front feet you liberal fools and try to justify his actions and deny that it is not racist.
 
Biden's dimwitted search for a new justice for the supreme court is blatant RACISM. If an employer were to place a help wanted ad in the paper framed in the same way he would be tared and feathered by Biden and his corrupt followers. Stand up on your two front feet you liberal fools and try to justify his actions and deny that it is not racist.
You aint black
 
So Biden is proud of doing something that if a private sector executive (or even government manager) did it, it would be against the [fucking] law: Overtly and blatantly discriminate on the basis of race AND gender.

If there were any question remaining about the man's idiocy [hint: there's not] this would eliminate that question.
 
Satan is part of the Christian Mythology.. Don't Christians all believe in Satan? They may say they despise him, but they believe he exists and therefore he is one of the Christian Supernatural beings. That mythology should be left up to the parents to indoctrinate their kids with.
You are against teaching Greek Mythology?

All Mythology should not be taught?
 
We do not need another black person on the Supreme Court
We do not need another woman on the Supreme Court
We do not need any minorities on the Supreme Court
We do not need democrats on the Supreme Court

We do not need to now the identity, politics, race, of any nominee to the Supreme Court.
 
I was taught it. I have no problem with it being taught as such. I put them all in the same category.
I thought you were saying Christianity should not be taught, if you put them all in one category I think that is fine. Certainly something as widespread as religion, should be taught in schools, as a topic.
 
I thought you were saying Christianity should not be taught, if you put them all in one category I think that is fine. Certainly something as widespread as religion, should be taught in schools, as a topic.
The Catholic school I went to the Bible Creation story was taught as part of the Mythology class.

I donno, maybe them Christian Brothers were just drinking too much Brandy?
 
The Catholic school I went to the Bible Creation story was taught as part of the Mythology class.

I donno, maybe them Christian Brothers were just drinking too much Brandy?
back in the 70's I dont remember religion being taught, but back then I think most of us went to church so there was no need for the local school to teach about religions. I really do not remember learning about muslims or jews either
 
back in the 70's I dont remember religion being taught, but back then I think most of us went to church so there was no need for the local school to teach about religions. I really do not remember learning about muslims or jews either
I only went to High School there. Public schools didn't have any of that.
 
Well.....they're for it.

Always have been.....but the dumbest among us vote for Democrats because they hate racism??????


1. There are only three things important to the Democrat program, agenda.....Race, Class, and Gender.
Not liberty, not religious freedom, not prosperity, not individuality, not tranquility.
Race, Class, and Gender.

“Cultural Marxism, though it’s dismissed by critics as a “term invented by the Right”, “was an undeniable school of thought taking Marxist categories of oppressed and oppressor beyond the economic realm and applying to it other forms of oppression: gender, race, sexuality.”
Caldron Pool



2. “A hundred years ago, kids in classrooms were taught the color of their skin was their most important characteristic — and if they looked a certain way, they were inferior. Today, kids again are being taught that the color of their skin defines them — and if they look a certain way, they’re an oppressor.” Tim Scott Text of Sen. Tim Scott's GOP response to Biden speech


3.




4.

View attachment 593866


View attachment 593867
View attachment 593868




5. Memo to the Democrat Party:

View attachment 593870



Yep.......racism is the basic tool of the democrat party, has been since the party was founded by two slave owners...or as joeb131 would call them.....slave rapists.........
 
Atheists cherish life, because they are assured of no afterlife. When you die the only thing left is memories of those you left behind, at least that is how I feel.


No....the guys who murdered close to 200 million people since 1917, stalin, hitler, mao, pol pot, castro........all leftists, all atheists, and they murdered close to 200 million people for no other reason than they were not on board with socialism........

They did not "cherish," life......
 
No....the guys who murdered close to 200 million people since 1917, stalin, hitler, mao, pol pot, castro........all leftists, all atheists, and they murdered close to 200 million people for no other reason than they were not on board with socialism........

They did not "cherish," life......
MY BODY , MY CHOICE COMES TO MIND. Do you want to discuss abortion.

Communism is banning books and media, the republicans really have nothing better to do.
 
MY BODY , MY CHOICE COMES TO MIND. Do you want to discuss abortion.

Communism is banning books and media, the republicans really have nothing better to do.

Abortion is the murder of an innocent child.........what is it with you leftists and murdering the weak and the helpless...?
 
MY BODY , MY CHOICE COMES TO MIND. Do you want to discuss abortion.

Communism is banning books and media, the republicans really have nothing better to do.


Moron, do you not understand that it is the democrats today who are banning books? They are getting them banned from Amazon, getting educators kicked out of their jobs on college and university campuses........getting people canceled...the new term for book burning...
 
Biden's dimwitted search for a new justice for the supreme court is blatant RACISM. If an employer were to place a help wanted ad in the paper framed in the same way he would be tared and feathered by Biden and his corrupt followers. Stand up on your two front feet you liberal fools and try to justify his actions and deny that it is not racist.


It is amazing that the party is steepted in racism, yet its adherents claim to be ther very opposite.

It is the sort of Mass Psychosis that rippled through the German population in the 30s and 40s.
 
MY BODY , MY CHOICE COMES TO MIND. Do you want to discuss abortion.

Communism is banning books and media, the republicans really have nothing better to do.


Does that apply to vaxx mandates, too?





"MY BODY , MY CHOICE COMES TO MIND. Do you want to discuss abortion."
And, just for your edification, the unborn is not a part of the mother's body.



There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

  1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
  2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
  3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
  4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
  5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
  6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
  7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
  8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
  9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"
Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

  1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:
As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

  1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
  2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
  3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.



Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?
 

Forum List

Back
Top