Democrat defends criminals who carry illegal guns while pushing to punish legal gun owners.....

[whitehall]

Fetterman's election illustrates the mental capacity of the democrat party base. The dirty little secret is that mass shooters are political tools to the democrat party. They hope that the shooter is wearing a MAGA hat an an NRA T-shirt but that never happens so they make use of what they have and their minions in the media forget minor details like an illegal alien who was deported five times killing 8 neighbors and a trannie terrorist planning an armed raid on a Christian school and killing 4 kids and 4 adults. Show us the manifest.

 

[surada]

This is the problem....the democrat party does not want to prosecute actual criminals who use guns, while at the same time increasing penalties on law abiding gun owners....

Case in point....

While Winfield has pushed gun control in the past, he’s also been cool to the idea of expanding the state’s current “assault weapons” ban to include those who lawfully purchased their firearms before the ban took effect.
----------
Winfield has also previously spoken in favor of things like community gun violence intervention programs and other non-law enforcement mechanisms to reduce violent crime by addressing root causes, and during Monday’s hearing he was extremely critical of the bills backed by Connecticut’s mayors, which would create the new (and vaguely-worded) crime of “serious firearm offense” and allow for repeat offenders to be held on higher bond and immediate revocation of parole or probation if arrested for a gun-related offense. In fact, Winfield touched a third-rail for Democrats and the gun control lobby, noting that many of the guys illegally carrying guns in New Haven are doing so not because they’re violent criminals, but because they want to protect themselves.
---------
It would define a serious gun offense as “possession of a stolen firearm or a firearm that is altered in a manner that renders the firearm unlawful, criminal possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a felony or the act of brandishing or shooting a firearm while threatening another person.”

Winfield, whose home in New Haven once was struck by gunfire, told Elicker that illegally possessing a gun on the streets of New Haven or Hartford should not expose young men to higher bail or the loss of parole.

Democrats' double standard on guns and violent crime on full display in CT hearing

While most of Monday’s mammoth Judiciary Committee hearing in Hartford was devoted to testimon

bearingarms.com

Firearm ownership in Yemen is considered as right rather than privilege, and therefore is allowed without any license or permit. Carry is unrestricted in the country. Yemen is the second most armed country in the world after the United States. (128 guns for every 100 residents).

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia › wiki
Gun law in Yemen - Wikipedia

 

[Rigby5]

Firearm ownership in Yemen is considered as right rather than privilege, and therefore is allowed without any license or permit. Carry is unrestricted in the country. Yemen is the second most armed country in the world after the United States. (128 guns for every 100 residents).

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia › wiki
Gun law in Yemen - Wikipedia

Yemen is really complicated history.
Seems almost everyone had a hand in trying to manipulate it.

{
In 1925, Imam Yahya captured Al Hudaydah from the Idrisids.[170] He continued to follow and attack the Idrisids until Asir fell under the control of the Imam's forces, forcing the Idrisids to request an agreement that would enable them to administer the region in the name of the Imam.[170] Imam Yahya refused the offer on the grounds that the Idrisis were of a Moroccan descent. According to Imam Yahya, the Idrisids, along with the British, were nothing but recent intruders and ought to be driven out of Yemen permanently.[171] In 1927, when Imam Yahya's forces were 50 km away from Aden, Ta'izz and Ibb were bombed by the British for five days, and the Imam had to pull back.[169] Small Bedouin forces mainly from the Madh'hij confederation of Marib, attacked Shabwah but were bombed by the British and had to retreat.

The Italian Empire was the first to recognize Imam Yahya as the King of Yemen in 1926. Furthermore, the Italians in 1926 and 1927 aimed at taking control of the Farasan Islands.[172] Italy had colonies of its own in the region: Eritrea and Somaliland, both of low profitability. There was expectation that increased ties with Yemen would fuel increased trade with the colonies and bring the region into the Italian sphere of influence. The Kingdom of Yemen at this point had its eye on annexing Aden and Imam Yahya also had aspirations for a Greater Yemen, with the possible help from Italy.

This created a great deal of anxiety for the British, who interpreted it as clear recognition of Imam Yahya's claim to sovereignty over Greater Yemen which included the Aden protectorate and Asir.[173]
...}

History of Yemen - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This is just a small middle section of time frame, and it is convoluted even more before and after this time period.
I guess that is to be expected since it is such a vital location to shipping trade.