Looks like my “composition fallacy” was actually “composition fact”, huh
Pogo
Nape. Fallacies are fallacies, period. Yours still stands there, rotting.
Sorry Sport, it’s not a fallacy when I proved it. And in the process proved you to be a lying sack of shit.
You "proved" NOTHING. You propped up a Composition Fallacy that you swallowed like so much bait from Dimbart. Now Dimbart KNOWS they put up a Composition Fallacy and figured anybody stupid enough to be reading Dimbart would swallow it hook line and sinker. And they were right because ---- here you are.
Let’s recap:
I posted a link in the OP identifying him as a Dimwinger.
You: He isn’t a Dimwinger.
Me: Here is a second link proving he is a Dimwinger.
You: Nuh-uh.
I would say I “proved” you to be a lying sack of shit moron, but we all already knew that.
”Nuh-uh” isn’t a debate skill, nor an argument. My multiple links prove you are a liar, an idiot, or both. I’m voting Both.