Dem Officials Refuse to Release Voter Data for Trump’s Fraud Investigation

[kiwiman127]

Chair Of South Carolina GOP Gives Voter Data To Trump's 'Fraud Panel' After State Refused

The state refuses but a Republican sends it anyway. F*ck the people. Republicans want a police state.

Yeah, it sucks for you snowflakes when people follow the laws on the books.

Again, you prove what a phony you are . You have always claimed to be a "real conservative', small government and the states rights that go with real conservative's core beliefs.
But here you are, states rights mean nothing to you, you are a fake conservative but a real easily manipulated tool. You have no convictions, at all.
Now go back and bury your head up Trump's rectum. Question; do you use a snorkel to breath, while your head is so deeply embedded up Trump's shitter?

 

[JQPublic1]

Let's make a deal. Trump's releases his tax rata and we'll cooperate.

Why do you imagine government officials should be allowed to refuse? You're nothing but a bootlicking fascist.

Hey, dumbass. Isn't Trump a government official? Didn't he refuse to release his taxes? Should he be allowed to do that? You are nothing but a groveling hypocrite.

You're an imbecile. Government officials have the same rights as everyone else, that includes having your tax information kept confidential. On the other hand, they have no authority in their capacity as government officials to refuse to release information collected precisely for the purpose of public review.

You should learn what hypocrisy means. Comparing two situations that are in no way comparable doesn't fit the description, moron.

Look, cummy konservative. Your boy Trump and gang has some nerve asking states for personal information on voters when he refuses to show his taxes as promised. That isn't legal or Constitutional. The GOP knows damn well that voter fraud is extremely rare,
ya durn fule. This proposed national voter data base is nothing more than a sham to serve some nefarious agenda
to compliment Cross-check.
.

It's not confidential information, turd. It's available to anyone who goes to the proper officials and asks for it. Some of it is even available on websites. Trump's taxes have nothing to do with this issue. That's just a sleazy snowflake diversion because they don't want anyone investigating voter fraud. That's their bread and butter. None of them would have jobs without it.

You don't even know what information was asked for, dumbass. As usual, you're just talking out of your ass.

And yes Trump's tax returns are an issue here because he publicly stated he would release them. After retracting that lie, the bitch then has the gall to ask for personal information on voters which includes the last 4 digits of their Social Security numbers.

I wouldn't trust Trump or the GOP to be alone with my dog...let alone any part of my SSN.

 

[JQPublic1]

Are you that butt hurt because I called for Trump to release his taxes before demanding my voter information and other personal data? Your maniacal response is symptomatic of just how dangerous you populist bahs-turds have become.

You cock biters on the left lost the election, your the one's with butt/hurt. Y'all should get used to it, it's in your future for a long time. You and the black pussy ninjas should go to Venezuela that commie/socialist government is fixing to fall and they need your help...

Are you that butt hurt because I called for Trump to release his taxes before demanding my voter information and other personal data? Your maniacal response is symptomatic of just how dangerous you populist bahs-turds have become.

You cock biters on the left lost the election, your the one's with butt/hurt. Y'all should get used to it, it's in your future for a long time. You and the black pussy ninjas should go to Venezuela that commie/socialist government is fixing to fall and they need your help...

First off, I'm not a cock biter nor am I left or right. I'm just an average American who makes choices based on logic and Sanity.secondly, I didn't lose a damn thing. Hillary and the people chosen by the Democratic Party hierarchy had an election stolen from them. I was just an observer on the sidelines just like you. Again, the election was not lost it was stolen by the Kassich Crosscheck program.
Another thing.don't tell me to go anywhere. I was born here, I have fought for this country, and I've watched my brothers shed their blood for it. I paid my dues, how about you?

Hey cock bite I paid my dues and I don't hide behind it or use it in a political forum so fuck off leftie, oh by the way thanks for your service if true...

Serving in the National Guard while living in your parents basement? I'm betting the closest thing to combat you've seen is via the Xbox you got for your 50th birthday.

Your oracle skills suck as most libtarts do, now ...

You're not very smart. It doesn't take an oracle to figure you out. Your shallow
rhetoric speaks volumes about you.
And so does time spent posting.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

OP and other RWNJs ask

"WHAT HAVE THEY GOT HIDE?"

When patriotic Americans asked the same about trump's tax return, obedient RWNJs said he has the right to privacy.

Difference is, trump is a known criminal.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Throw their asses in prison.

RWNJs ^^^ like AsianTrumpSupporter never miss an opportunity to trash the US Constitution.



Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[American_Jihad]

Judicial Watch Sues for Voter Registration Data Under National Voter Registration Act
JULY 18, 2017

Defendant Montgomery County, Maryland Has More Registered Voters Than Voting Age Citizens

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit today in order to gain access under federal law to voter registration lists in Montgomery County, Maryland. The suit was filed against Montgomery County and the Maryland State Boards of Elections under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA). The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division (Judicial Watch vs. Linda H. Lamone, et al. (No. 1:17-cv-02006)).

In an April 11, 2017, notice letter sent to Maryland election officials, Judicial Watch explained that there were more registered voters in Montgomery County than there were citizens over the age of 18. The letter threatened a lawsuit if the problems with Montgomery County’s voter rolls were not fixed. The letter also requested access to Montgomery County voter registration lists in order to evaluate the efficacy of any “programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency of Maryland’s official eligible voter lists during the past 2 years.” On July 7, Maryland denied Judicial Watch access to the voter registration list because Maryland laws supposedly restricts the release of voter registration information only to Maryland registered voters.

But Section 8(i) of the NVRA provides that “[e]ach State shall maintain for at least 2 years and shall make available for public inspection and, where available, photocopying at a reasonable cost, all records concerning the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible voter.”

Judicial Watch, in its lawsuit, noted that the registration list it requested from the Maryland and Montgomery County boards is covered under Section 8(i) of the NVRA:

...

Judicial Watch Sues for Voter Registration Data Under National Voter Registration Act - Judicial Watch

 

[American_Jihad]

You can bet dumbocrats loath this guy...

 

[IM2]

I live in a republican state and our state is not releasing this information either.

 

[American_Jihad]

Voter ID will happen sooner or later no way around it, the government will issue them for free and give you a free bus voucher to go get them, oh noes no more excuses...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say
Will Schmitt, [email protected] 9:25 a.m. CT Aug. 9, 2017

...video

The first election in which local voters were asked to present photographic identification went well, election officials in Greene and Christian counties say.

Only minor issues related to the voter ID law were reported by Greene County Clerk Shane Schoeller and Christian County Clerk Kay Brown after polls closed Tuesday night.

Sixty-three percent of about 2.7 million Missourians voting last November approved a constitutional amendment enacting the voter ID law. Starting this summer, Missouri elections have called for voters to show a government-issued photo ID, commonly a driver's license.

Voters who don't produce such a document are able to cast ballots by presenting some other form of identification and signing an affidavit. A third option for those without any form of ID is to cast provisional ballots.

"We had one judge during the beginning of the day who had some questions regarding if we needed to ask the voter for a photo ID specifically," Schoeller told the News-Leader when asked about voter ID-related hiccups. "Due to the three options that are available to the voter to vote, we reminded her that we were only asking the voter to present ID."


Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican who campaigned in support of a voter ID law, embarked on a statewide tour in June to educate voters about the law, including a stop in Springfield. Ashcroft reiterated his main message, which was highlighted on a poster: "If you are registered to vote, you can vote.

...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say

 

[IM2]

Voter ID will happen sooner or later no way around it, the government will issue them for free and give you a free bus voucher to go get them, oh noes no more excuses...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say
Will Schmitt, [email protected] 9:25 a.m. CT Aug. 9, 2017

...video

The first election in which local voters were asked to present photographic identification went well, election officials in Greene and Christian counties say.

Only minor issues related to the voter ID law were reported by Greene County Clerk Shane Schoeller and Christian County Clerk Kay Brown after polls closed Tuesday night.

Sixty-three percent of about 2.7 million Missourians voting last November approved a constitutional amendment enacting the voter ID law. Starting this summer, Missouri elections have called for voters to show a government-issued photo ID, commonly a driver's license.

Voters who don't produce such a document are able to cast ballots by presenting some other form of identification and signing an affidavit. A third option for those without any form of ID is to cast provisional ballots.

"We had one judge during the beginning of the day who had some questions regarding if we needed to ask the voter for a photo ID specifically," Schoeller told the News-Leader when asked about voter ID-related hiccups. "Due to the three options that are available to the voter to vote, we reminded her that we were only asking the voter to present ID."


Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican who campaigned in support of a voter ID law, embarked on a statewide tour in June to educate voters about the law, including a stop in Springfield. Ashcroft reiterated his main message, which was highlighted on a poster: "If you are registered to vote, you can vote.

...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say

We don't need voter ID's.

 

[American_Jihad]

Voter ID will happen sooner or later no way around it, the government will issue them for free and give you a free bus voucher to go get them, oh noes no more excuses...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say
Will Schmitt, [email protected] 9:25 a.m. CT Aug. 9, 2017

...video

The first election in which local voters were asked to present photographic identification went well, election officials in Greene and Christian counties say.

Only minor issues related to the voter ID law were reported by Greene County Clerk Shane Schoeller and Christian County Clerk Kay Brown after polls closed Tuesday night.

Sixty-three percent of about 2.7 million Missourians voting last November approved a constitutional amendment enacting the voter ID law. Starting this summer, Missouri elections have called for voters to show a government-issued photo ID, commonly a driver's license.

Voters who don't produce such a document are able to cast ballots by presenting some other form of identification and signing an affidavit. A third option for those without any form of ID is to cast provisional ballots.

"We had one judge during the beginning of the day who had some questions regarding if we needed to ask the voter for a photo ID specifically," Schoeller told the News-Leader when asked about voter ID-related hiccups. "Due to the three options that are available to the voter to vote, we reminded her that we were only asking the voter to present ID."


Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican who campaigned in support of a voter ID law, embarked on a statewide tour in June to educate voters about the law, including a stop in Springfield. Ashcroft reiterated his main message, which was highlighted on a poster: "If you are registered to vote, you can vote.

...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say

We don't need voter ID's.

Go back home to mexico...

 

[IM2]

Voter ID will happen sooner or later no way around it, the government will issue them for free and give you a free bus voucher to go get them, oh noes no more excuses...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say
Will Schmitt, [email protected] 9:25 a.m. CT Aug. 9, 2017

...video

The first election in which local voters were asked to present photographic identification went well, election officials in Greene and Christian counties say.

Only minor issues related to the voter ID law were reported by Greene County Clerk Shane Schoeller and Christian County Clerk Kay Brown after polls closed Tuesday night.

Sixty-three percent of about 2.7 million Missourians voting last November approved a constitutional amendment enacting the voter ID law. Starting this summer, Missouri elections have called for voters to show a government-issued photo ID, commonly a driver's license.

Voters who don't produce such a document are able to cast ballots by presenting some other form of identification and signing an affidavit. A third option for those without any form of ID is to cast provisional ballots.

"We had one judge during the beginning of the day who had some questions regarding if we needed to ask the voter for a photo ID specifically," Schoeller told the News-Leader when asked about voter ID-related hiccups. "Due to the three options that are available to the voter to vote, we reminded her that we were only asking the voter to present ID."


Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican who campaigned in support of a voter ID law, embarked on a statewide tour in June to educate voters about the law, including a stop in Springfield. Ashcroft reiterated his main message, which was highlighted on a poster: "If you are registered to vote, you can vote.

...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say

We don't need voter ID's.

Go back home to mexico...

Well that would be difficult since I am an American.

We don't need voter ID's.

 

[busybee01]

Voter ID will happen sooner or later no way around it, the government will issue them for free and give you a free bus voucher to go get them, oh noes no more excuses...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say
Will Schmitt, [email protected] 9:25 a.m. CT Aug. 9, 2017

...video

The first election in which local voters were asked to present photographic identification went well, election officials in Greene and Christian counties say.

Only minor issues related to the voter ID law were reported by Greene County Clerk Shane Schoeller and Christian County Clerk Kay Brown after polls closed Tuesday night.

Sixty-three percent of about 2.7 million Missourians voting last November approved a constitutional amendment enacting the voter ID law. Starting this summer, Missouri elections have called for voters to show a government-issued photo ID, commonly a driver's license.

Voters who don't produce such a document are able to cast ballots by presenting some other form of identification and signing an affidavit. A third option for those without any form of ID is to cast provisional ballots.

"We had one judge during the beginning of the day who had some questions regarding if we needed to ask the voter for a photo ID specifically," Schoeller told the News-Leader when asked about voter ID-related hiccups. "Due to the three options that are available to the voter to vote, we reminded her that we were only asking the voter to present ID."


Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican who campaigned in support of a voter ID law, embarked on a statewide tour in June to educate voters about the law, including a stop in Springfield. Ashcroft reiterated his main message, which was highlighted on a poster: "If you are registered to vote, you can vote.

...

First elections under voter ID law go smoothly, local officials say

We don't need voter ID's.

Go back home to mexico...

Why don't you go to Mexico. The average IQ in this country would increase.

 

[American_Jihad]

Tee Hee: California Progressives Allege Voter Fraud in Democratic Party Election, Demand Voter ID

Guy Benson
|
Posted: May 24, 2017

Earlier this month, we highlighted a popcorn-worthy story of former DNC workers suing the Democratic Party -- ostensible champions of the little guy -- over sub-minimum wage salaries, and an alleged refusal to offer overtime pay. This story out of California may be even richer. You may have heard that the state party's annual convention was marred by discord and vulgarity, with national DNC Chairman Tom "F-Bomb" Perez getting booed by delegates even before his terrible fundraising numbers came out. One of the most controversial moments of the tumultuous meeting was the narrow election of an establishment Democrat to chair the state party, beating a Bernie-style left-winger. The defeated candidate's supporters were furious, insisting that the outcome was highly suspicious, if not outright fraudulent. And one of their specific objections was absolutely delicious:

...

I, for one, am disgusted by California progressives' support for "voter suppression" methods such as requiring proper identification to ensure the integrity of an election. Their demand that only eligible voters be permitted to cast ballots, according to established rules, is an outrage. And quite possibly racist, or something. Because as we've been told, voter fraud doesn't exist. It's a myth. Conjured out of thin air by the terrible Republicans. To combat a fake problem. Or maybe, when the chips are down and the stakes matter to them, lefties realize that the vast majority of Americans who are in favor of voter ID laws support a common sense measure to safeguard electoral results. By the way, a primary source of acrimony at this week's convention was fury from grassroots lefties over some elected Democrats' concerns about a proposed single-payer healthcare scheme:

...

Tee Hee: California Progressives Allege Voter Fraud in Democrat Party Election, Demand Voter ID

I b gots mines...

 

[American_Jihad]

College student gets 100 days in slammer for registering dead voters for Dems
Published August 10, 2017
Fox News

Video:

A Virginia college student was sentenced this week to 100 days incarceration for submitting fraudulent voter registration forms listing the names of dead people and other faulty information for a political organization connected to the Democratic Party.

Andrew J. Spieles, 21, was sentenced in federal court Tuesday for knowingly transferring false Virginia voter registration forms during the 2016 election, according to the Justice Department.

Spieles, a student at James Madison University, worked as a staffer for Harrisonburg Votes -- a group affiliated with the Democratic Party -- and was paid to register voters in the area during the weeks leading up to the 2016 election. Spieles’ job was to register as many voters as possible; he reported to Democratic campaign headquarters in Harrisonburg, Va., according to the DOJ.

...

College student gets 100 days in slammer for registering dead voters for Dems

 

[Gracie]

Can't they subpoena them?

 

[American_Jihad]

Can't they subpoena them?

To end all speculation we need voter ID, there's no excuse not to have it...

 

[my2¢]

Dem Officials Refuse to Release Voter Data for Trump’s Fraud Investigation
What are they trying to hide?

A: The same private information that GOP state officials have been entrusted with and refuse to share with Trump:

Reagan, a Republican, received the formal request from Washington on Monday.

“I share the concerns of many Arizona citizens that the Commission’s request implicates serious privacy concerns,” she wrote in response to the request for voter information. “Since there is nothing in Executive Order 13799 (nor federal law) that gives the Commission authority to unilaterally acquire and disseminate such sensitive information, the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office is not in a position to fulfill your request.”
​

Arizona to oppose handing over voter information to Trump commission

 

[American_Jihad]

Dem Officials Refuse to Release Voter Data for Trump’s Fraud Investigation
What are they trying to hide?

A: The same private information that GOP state officials have been entrusted with and refuse to share with Trump:

Reagan, a Republican, received the formal request from Washington on Monday.

“I share the concerns of many Arizona citizens that the Commission’s request implicates serious privacy concerns,” she wrote in response to the request for voter information. “Since there is nothing in Executive Order 13799 (nor federal law) that gives the Commission authority to unilaterally acquire and disseminate such sensitive information, the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office is not in a position to fulfill your request.”
​

Arizona to oppose handing over voter information to Trump commission

Voter ID would cure all, and you can bet the dumbocrats are going to whine...

 

[Gracie]

We are in Cali. When we go vote, we have to show the paper they sent with our names on it, and our ID.

With that said..there is a lot of identity theft everywhere. Will voter ID even work?