Dem Constitutional Expert: Pelosi Played Into McConnell's Hands, Destroyed Her Own Case

[August West]

" I would like you to do us a favor". Without an announcement of an investigation, not an actual investigation, Trump was going to withhold aid. This isn`t about Obama or anyone named Biden. Do you have anything else?

Bill Clinton based his entire defense of his sexual harassment of Paula jones on SEMANTICS - on the 'Definition of the word 'IS' '.
-- For his effort, he was found guilty of Contempt of Court, for attempting to deceive the court and jury, for attempting to deprive an American citizen of her right to a fair trial, he was stripped of his license to practice law, and he was Impeached.

Now you snowflakes want to base the Impeachment of he most successful President in the last 50 years, in some cases EVER...you seek to claim that the Democrats' Impeachment - that the Founding Fathers mandated requires evidence of 'Crimes' / 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' - is based on SEMANTICS, on the DEMOCRATS' / SNOWFLAKES' biased, hate-driven, TDS-suffering definition of the word 'US'?!

Bwuhahahahahahahaha!

Lying to congress about a consensual blowjob or shaking down foreign leaders to interfere with our electoral process. Which is the greater threat to this country? This is a hard question for a cultist bootlicker so take your time and try to get it right. I know you`re not Ken Jennings but do your best with this one. Let Lindsey Graham be your conscience.

 

[easyt65]

The trouble is that Turley is wrong.

THIS dumbass claimed to be a Constitutional Scholar, and even HE would laugh at your ridiculous, triggered, emotionally-manipulated, hate-driven DUMB ass right now for attempting to claim to be smarter than the Democrats' Constitutional Expert!

But thank you for the biggest laugh of the day!



.

 

[busybee01]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.

There was a impeachable offense. Withholding aid to a foreign country to pressure a foreign government to investigate a political rival is impeachable. This is worse than Watergate. Also the fact that the Trump campaign gave campaign information to a individual with ties to Russian Intelligence shows the campaign had no qualms about helping the Russians help Trump. When Giuliani went to Ukraine, he got his information from pro-Russia leaning people.

 

[easyt65]

Lying to congress about a consensual blowjob or shaking down foreign leaders to interfere with our electoral process.

Thank you for bringing up possibly the BIGGEST LIE about 'Impeachment' in modern history.

The LIE that Bill Clinton was Impeached for having an affair with Monica Lewinsky in the WH is the BIGGEST LIE about Impeachment that snowflakes like to throw out. Presidents have had affairs in the WH before - no big deal. Bill Clinton was not Impeached for a 'blowjob in the WH and for lying about it'.

Bill Clinton made history for having to defend himself, as President, in a court of law in a suit involving his sexual harassment of Paula Jones. During this trial Clinton was found guilty of Contempt of Court for attempting to defraud / deceive the court and the Jury through deceptive testimony, denying a US Citizen's right to a fair trial. For his crime Clinton was admonished for his lack of ethics and attempted violation of Rights swore an oath to protect / defend, he was stripped of his license to practice law...and was Impeached.

I am glad you also mentioned 'shaking down foreign leaders'. Despite the Democrats ability to provide any evidence or witnesses to such a crime involving the President, it is nice to know you support going after Joe Biden, who gave a videotaped confession of doing so.

 

[NightFox]

The basis for supporting Trump's impeachment is strong. It is very clear that Trump did attempt to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political rival by withholding aid. That is several years after campaign information was turned over to a person who has ties to Russian Intelligence. Undoubtedly that information was used to help the Russians help Trump. Allowing something like this is the danger.

You obviously did not read Turley's article since if you did you would know that he wasn't arguing against the basis for Trump's impeachment, he was pointing out how badly the Democrats in the House mishandled building the case and the challenges the Senate faces in handling the trial.

 

[easyt65]

There was a impeachable offense. Withholding aid to a foreign country to pressure a foreign government to investigate a political rival is impeachable.

Ummmm, sweetheart....no aid was withheld from Ukraine. Ukraine got its aid from the US....unlike when Biden admittedly extorted the former Ukraine PM and Obama withheld lethal military aid / refused to allow anyone else deliver lethal military aid Ukraine needed to protect and defend itself from Putin's invasion. (Barry's demonstration to Putin of his 'flexibility'.....)

Funny, you weren't pissed when Barry refused to deliver necessary aid to Ukraine, making sure Russia had nothing to fear as they marched into Crimea.....

 

[busybee01]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.

She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.

Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?

Hunter Biden is not a coke head. He is someone who has a disease. Just like Rush Limbaugh. There is no evidence that there was anything illegal. The DOJ could investigate the Bidens if there was any evidence to open even a preliminary inquiry. The DOJ has not done so.

 

[Billiejeens]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.

She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.

Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?

Hunter Biden is not a coke head. He is someone who has a disease. Just like Rush Limbaugh. There is no evidence that there was anything illegal. The DOJ could investigate the Bidens if there was any evidence to open even a preliminary inquiry. The DOJ has not done so.

Why do you think that there is no investigation?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.

There was a impeachable offense. Withholding aid to a foreign country to pressure a foreign government to investigate a political rival is impeachable. This is worse than Watergate. Also the fact that the Trump campaign gave campaign information to a individual with ties to Russian Intelligence shows the campaign had no qualms about helping the Russians help Trump. When Giuliani went to Ukraine, he got his information from pro-Russia leaning people.

First, any reasonable person who isn’t drowning in partisanship can see how fishy Hunter’s job with Burisma was. So you have to ask, why did Hunter get paid millions of dollars from a foreign energy company when his only qualification is his last name? Could it be that Burisma, a foreign energy company, wanted access to our VEEP? That is a very credible assumption that at the very least should be investigated.

It should have been investigated by BO, since it occurred on his watch. And if he had investigated it, all of you partisan democrats would have applauded him for investigating corruption within his own administration, but he dropped the ball, so Trump asked for the investigation.

Now the democrats have to apply a motive for Trump asking for investigation to create the crime of abuse of power. Do you understand that if Biden was not running for President, ergo was not a political rival, there would not be any crime to create?

 

[busybee01]

The trouble is that Turley is wrong.

View attachment 300704

THIS dumbass claimed to be a Constitutional Scholar, and even HE would laugh at your ridiculous, triggered, emotionally-manipulated, hate-driven DUMB ass right now for attempting to claim to be smarter than the Democrats' Constitutional Expert!

But thank you for the biggest laugh of the day!



.

You are the one who is laughable. Apparently no dissent is allowed with the people you agree with. To be a Constitutional expert, you need some common sense, read English and be open minded. During the testimony, 3 constitutional experts disagreed with Turley. YOU ARE THE DUMBASS. Unlike Turley, I do not change my opinion. Turley was one of the experts Republicans used during Clinton's impeachment;. In 2014, Turley contradicted his testimony that impeachment has to be a criminal offense.

"While there’s a high bar for what constitutes grounds for impeachment, an offense does not have to be indictable. Serious misconduct or a violation of public trust is enough. Madison saw impeachment as “defending the community against the incapacity, negligence or perfidy of the chief magistrate.” And the founders emphasized that impeachments were about what happened in the political arena: involving “political crimes and misdemeanors” and resulting in “political punishments.”

 

[easyt65]

You are the one who is laughable. Apparently no dissent is allowed with the people you agree with.

You can 'dissent' all you want, but to declare the Democrats' Constitutional Expert is wrong based on snowflake opinion is hilarious. You are the same idiots who watch the same videotaped confession by Joe Biden and say, 'That isn't what he means'...'He didn't really say that'...bwuhahahahaha.

To be a Constitutional expert, you need some common sense...

That leaves you out, snowflake

 

[Nostra]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.

She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.

Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?

Hunter Biden is not a coke head. He is someone who has a disease. Just like Rush Limbaugh. There is no evidence that there was anything illegal. The DOJ could investigate the Bidens if there was any evidence to open even a preliminary inquiry. The DOJ has not done so.

Hunter Biden is not a coke head.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/joe-bidens-son-hunter-kicked-out-navy-cocaine-n227811

 

[easyt65]

Hunter Biden is not a coke head.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He is also not a dead-beat dad, adulterer, alcohol-abuser, identity thief, was not booted out of the military, and his vast experience and knowledge of Ukraine and the oil industry was why he was hired by Burisma....

 

[busybee01]

The basis for supporting Trump's impeachment is strong. It is very clear that Trump did attempt to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political rival by withholding aid. That is several years after campaign information was turned over to a person who has ties to Russian Intelligence. Undoubtedly that information was used to help the Russians help Trump. Allowing something like this is the danger.

You obviously did not read Turley's article since if you did you would know that he wasn't arguing against the basis for Trump's impeachment, he was pointing out how badly the Democrats in the House mishandled building the case and the challenges the Senate faces in handling the trial.

Sorry his testimony shows his dishonesty. The article is so much poop and it is not surprising it would be Fox News since they are one of the leading producers of pro-Trump poop The record is complete and there is no doubt of the fact that Trump pressured a foreign government to investigate a political rival. Also worth noting that is that the Senate only came to a agreement in the last 2 days or so. There was no delay. Of course, McConnell working with the White House is okay. Turley is throwing out mud hoping something will stick.

 

[easyt65]

Sorry his testimony shows his dishonesty.

Again, you seek to claim YOU are more of a Constitutional Expert.

Bwuhahahahahahaha.......

UNLIKE YOU, he based his testimony on the US Constitution and Rule of Law, not butt-hurt, Trump-hating, TDS-suffering emotion and the desperation of wanting to finally accomplish something Democrats vowed to do 5 minutes after he completed his oath of office.

 

[busybee01]

There was a impeachable offense. Withholding aid to a foreign country to pressure a foreign government to investigate a political rival is impeachable.

Ummmm, sweetheart....no aid was withheld from Ukraine. Ukraine got its aid from the US....unlike when Biden admittedly extorted the former Ukraine PM and Obama withheld lethal military aid / refused to allow anyone else deliver lethal military aid Ukraine needed to protect and defend itself from Putin's invasion. (Barry's demonstration to Putin of his 'flexibility'.....)

Funny, you weren't pissed when Barry refused to deliver necessary aid to Ukraine, making sure Russia had nothing to fear as they marched into Crimea.....

Obama was correctly ensuring that American aid was not lost to corruption. Republican senators also sent a leader to Ukraine along the same lines. Some of these senators such as Ron Johnson signed the letter. Republicans had no issues when the Obama Administration did this but now that Biden is a threat to Trump, it is a big deal.

Obama got taken to the cleaners by Putin. However it is clear that Putin is helping Trump again. Also I opposed Obama's decision not to provide lethal aid and opposed Republicans taking that plank out of their platform.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

And how did you come to that conclusion ?

He's an expert...period.

Highly respected....until he turned on the democrats. Then they tried to get him fired.

Yes...that is the left.....we love you until you disagree with us, then we become ANTIFA.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

And how did you come to that conclusion ?

He's an expert...period.

Highly respected....until he turned on the democrats. Then they tried to get him fired.

Yes...that is the left.....we love you until you disagree with us, then we become ANTIFA.

I came to that conclusion because he was called to testify by the Repubs.
Are you really this fucking stupid or is it an act for the internet?

 

[busybee01]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.

There was a impeachable offense. Withholding aid to a foreign country to pressure a foreign government to investigate a political rival is impeachable. This is worse than Watergate. Also the fact that the Trump campaign gave campaign information to a individual with ties to Russian Intelligence shows the campaign had no qualms about helping the Russians help Trump. When Giuliani went to Ukraine, he got his information from pro-Russia leaning people.

First, any reasonable person who isn’t drowning in partisanship can see how fishy Hunter’s job with Burisma was. So you have to ask, why did Hunter get paid millions of dollars from a foreign energy company when his only qualification is his last name? Could it be that Burisma, a foreign energy company, wanted access to our VEEP? That is a very credible assumption that at the very least should be investigated.

It should have been investigated by BO, since it occurred on his watch. And if he had investigated it, all of you partisan democrats would have applauded him for investigating corruption within his own administration, but he dropped the ball, so Trump asked for the investigation.

Now the democrats have to apply a motive for Trump asking for investigation to create the crime of abuse of power. Do you understand that if Biden was not running for President, ergo was not a political rival, there would not be any crime to create?

You are the one who is drowning in partisanship. You say it is fishy but there is no evidence of it. Giuliani supposedly turned over the information he received from Ukraine to the DOJ and what has happened. Nothing. Because there is nothing there. We don't open investigations over partisan views such as yours. The fact is that there is no evidence to back you up. Not even enough to open a preliminary investigation. Since I voted for neither Obama nor Trump, I am hardly partisan. You are.

 

[busybee01]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.

She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.

Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?

Hunter Biden is not a coke head. He is someone who has a disease. Just like Rush Limbaugh. There is no evidence that there was anything illegal. The DOJ could investigate the Bidens if there was any evidence to open even a preliminary inquiry. The DOJ has not done so.

Hunter Biden is not a coke head.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe Biden's Son Hunter Kicked Out of Navy for Cocaine

He is a person who has a sickness. For you to take advantage of it shows how much garbage you and Trump supporters are.