Dem Constitutional Expert: Pelosi Played Into McConnell's Hands, Destroyed Her Own Case

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

Who is 100% a Democrat, who voted for Hillary
He simply does not think that The Constitution is worth ignoring.
Your argument is childish.
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Wow your IQ gets more impressive every day lol

Who knew it could be so low.
 
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....

That’s not what Turley said. Turley said the case against Trump is incomplete. He did not say he committed no crimes. He has good credentials but he also has a dodgy history when it comes to impeachment.

Anyway, if what you’re saying about Pelosi is true, why doesn’t McConnell have the votes for immediate acquittal?

I think that you dont understand the process at all.
 
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....

That’s not what Turley said. Turley said the case against Trump is incomplete. He did not say he committed no crimes. He has good credentials but he also has a dodgy history when it comes to impeachment.

Anyway, if what you’re saying about Pelosi is true, why doesn’t McConnell have the votes for immediate acquittal?

I think that you dont understand the process at all.

Better than most.

McConnell unlikely to pursue dismissal vote on impeachment articles
 
Should all presidents be allowed to shake down foreign leaders in an attempt to influence our elections or just this one?

Who shook down a foreign leader? We know the previous admin was covertly overthrowing govts and using the vp name to obtain goodies for his son.
" I would like you to do us a favor". Without an announcement of an investigation, not an actual investigation, Trump was going to withhold aid. This isn`t about Obama or anyone named Biden. Do you have anything else?

You have to know that is not what was said.
 
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....

That’s not what Turley said. Turley said the case against Trump is incomplete. He did not say he committed no crimes. He has good credentials but he also has a dodgy history when it comes to impeachment.

Anyway, if what you’re saying about Pelosi is true, why doesn’t McConnell have the votes for immediate acquittal?

I think that you dont understand the process at all.

Better than most.

McConnell unlikely to pursue dismissal vote on impeachment articles


I laugh.
 
IMHO the article by Jonathan Turley that is referenced by the Fox News story is interesting and worth the read:
Pelosi’s Blunder: How The House Destroyed Its Own Case For Impeachment

He lays out a good case with regards to how badly the HoR and Nancy Pelosi have mismanaged this entire impeachment process as well as the challenges now faced by the Senate on dispensing with this shoddily put together case.
 
Should all presidents be allowed to shake down foreign leaders in an attempt to influence our elections or just this one?

Who shook down a foreign leader? We know the previous admin was covertly overthrowing govts and using the vp name to obtain goodies for his son.
" I would like you to do us a favor". Without an announcement of an investigation, not an actual investigation, Trump was going to withhold aid. This isn`t about Obama or anyone named Biden. Do you have anything else?


Except, he didn't withhold it. You got anything else. This is about uncle joe. You can't just make stuff up and thats what you're doing.
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.
She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.


For making up lies like she did. Oh yeah, she had a choice.
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.


Not to burst your little bubble, but Turley is NOT a republican...He didn't even vote for Trump....
 
" I would like you to do us a favor". Without an announcement of an investigation, not an actual investigation, Trump was going to withhold aid. This isn`t about Obama or anyone named Biden. Do you have anything else?

Bill Clinton based his entire defense of his sexual harassment of Paula jones on SEMANTICS - on the 'Definition of the word 'IS' '.
-- For his effort, he was found guilty of Contempt of Court, for attempting to deceive the court and jury, for attempting to deprive an American citizen of her right to a fair trial, he was stripped of his license to practice law, and he was Impeached.


Now you snowflakes want to base the Impeachment of he most successful President in the last 50 years, in some cases EVER...you seek to claim that the Democrats' Impeachment - that the Founding Fathers mandated requires evidence of 'Crimes' / 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' - is based on SEMANTICS, on the DEMOCRATS' / SNOWFLAKES' biased, hate-driven, TDS-suffering definition of the word 'US'?!

:lmao: Bwuhahahahahahahaha!
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

Who is 100% a Democrat, who voted for Hillary
He simply does not think that The Constitution is worth ignoring.
Your argument is childish.

To you people the truth is always childish.
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.


Not to burst your little bubble, but Turley is NOT a republican...He didn't even vote for Trump....

I did not comment on his voting record...just that he was a witness called by the Repubs and not the Dems.

why did the truth trigger you yet again?
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.


Not to burst your little bubble, but Turley is NOT a republican...He didn't even vote for Trump....

Not that is matters but it was the Republicans that called on Turley to testify as a legal expert during the impeachment hearings.

I don't see anything that specifies exactly which party Turley identifies with but he did say publicly that he doesn't support Trump.:dunno:
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Jonathan Turley is hardly a unbiased observer. He was wrong on impeachment It is McConnell who has blown it. He is directly coordinating with the White House rather than acting in a non-partisan matter. Pelosi did not abuse her power McConnell did as he has since Trump took over. He refuses to allow bills to be voted on even if they have bi-partisan support.

The basis for supporting Trump's impeachment is strong. It is very clear that Trump did attempt to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political rival by withholding aid. That is several years after campaign information was turned over to a person who has ties to Russian Intelligence. Undoubtedly that information was used to help the Russians help Trump. Allowing something like this is the danger.

I love the thinking. McConnel openly meets with the White House to talk strategy. Republican Senators openly talk about dismissing the case, declaring Trump innocent and other things BEFORE hearing the evidence. That is not partisan? Republicans have been partisan but that is okay with Turley. Turley has a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. He sounds stupid.
 
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....

The trouble is that Turley is wrong. Numerous legal experts disagree with him and 2 other experts who testified with him disagree. Trump is too stupid to play checkers. The Republicans chose Turley because they knew what he would say. It doesn't matter what someone's political leanings are. Turley is plain wrong. What Trump has done makes Watergate look like a tea party.
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Jonathan Turley is hardly a unbiased observer. He was wrong on impeachment It is McConnell who has blown it. He is directly coordinating with the White House rather than acting in a non-partisan matter. Pelosi did not abuse her power McConnell did as he has since Trump took over. He refuses to allow bills to be voted on even if they have bi-partisan support.

The basis for supporting Trump's impeachment is strong. It is very clear that Trump did attempt to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political rival by withholding aid. That is several years after campaign information was turned over to a person who has ties to Russian Intelligence. Undoubtedly that information was used to help the Russians help Trump. Allowing something like this is the danger.

I love the thinking. McConnel openly meets with the White House to talk strategy. Republican Senators openly talk about dismissing the case, declaring Trump innocent and other things BEFORE hearing the evidence. That is not partisan? Republicans have been partisan but that is okay with Turley. Turley has a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. He sounds stupid.


He is directly coordinating with the White House rather than acting in a non-partisan matter.

Dimwingers in the Senate directly coordinated with Clinton during his impeachment trial.

Oops!
 
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Jonathan Turley is hardly a unbiased observer. He was wrong on impeachment It is McConnell who has blown it. He is directly coordinating with the White House rather than acting in a non-partisan matter. Pelosi did not abuse her power McConnell did as he has since Trump took over. He refuses to allow bills to be voted on even if they have bi-partisan support.

The basis for supporting Trump's impeachment is strong. It is very clear that Trump did attempt to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political rival by withholding aid. That is several years after campaign information was turned over to a person who has ties to Russian Intelligence. Undoubtedly that information was used to help the Russians help Trump. Allowing something like this is the danger.

I love the thinking. McConnel openly meets with the White House to talk strategy. Republican Senators openly talk about dismissing the case, declaring Trump innocent and other things BEFORE hearing the evidence. That is not partisan? Republicans have been partisan but that is okay with Turley. Turley has a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. He sounds stupid.


I just think that you have no concept of how this works.
That's okay
I don't think that anyone expects you to.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top