Dem Constitutional Expert: Pelosi Played Into McConnell's Hands, Destroyed Her Own Case

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
60,034
Reaction score
13,426
Points
2,290
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.
 
OP
easyt65

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
60,034
Reaction score
13,426
Points
2,290
PELOSI IS MELTING DOWN...

Her tabling references to 'Time' was a desperate attempt to salvage her own perception that she is a 'master strategist' for delaying the Articles of Impeachment ... but it's too late.

Even CNN hammered her for destroying her own narrative of the quick need to remove the President from office by delaying sending the Articles to the Senate.

The Democrats' own Constitutional Expert stated Pelosi overplayed her hand and placed herself in McConnell's hands, destroying their case with the delay.

Pelosi's delay was also another example of the abuse of power their expert testified the Democrats, not the President, are guilty of.
 

Golfing Gator

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
49,523
Reaction score
6,207
Points
1,870
Location
Midwest of America
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
 

August West

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,500
Reaction score
1,113
Points
290
Should all presidents be allowed to shake down foreign leaders in an attempt to influence our elections or just this one?
 
OP
easyt65

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
60,034
Reaction score
13,426
Points
2,290
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....
 

Jitss617

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Messages
27,827
Reaction score
2,770
Points
275
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Wow your IQ gets more impressive every day lol
 

LordBrownTrout

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
27,240
Reaction score
4,817
Points
280
Location
South Texas
Should all presidents be allowed to shake down foreign leaders in an attempt to influence our elections or just this one?
Who shook down a foreign leader? We know the previous admin was covertly overthrowing govts and using the vp name to obtain goodies for his son.
 

colfax_m

Silver Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
666
Points
95
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....
That’s not what Turley said. Turley said the case against Trump is incomplete. He did not say he committed no crimes. He has good credentials but he also has a dodgy history when it comes to impeachment.

Anyway, if what you’re saying about Pelosi is true, why doesn’t McConnell have the votes for immediate acquittal?
 

ColonelAngus

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
21,444
Reaction score
4,153
Points
290
The Dimms are impeaching Trump because he went to the courts over the Dimms Subpoenas.

Let that one marinate. Why didn’t the Dimms let the legal process run its course?
 

August West

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,500
Reaction score
1,113
Points
290
Should all presidents be allowed to shake down foreign leaders in an attempt to influence our elections or just this one?
Who shook down a foreign leader? We know the previous admin was covertly overthrowing govts and using the vp name to obtain goodies for his son.
" I would like you to do us a favor". Without an announcement of an investigation, not an actual investigation, Trump was going to withhold aid. This isn`t about Obama or anyone named Biden. Do you have anything else?
 

BuckToothMoron

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2016
Messages
9,717
Reaction score
1,745
Points
290
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.
You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.
 

ColonelAngus

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
21,444
Reaction score
4,153
Points
290
Should all presidents be allowed to shake down foreign leaders in an attempt to influence our elections or just this one?
Who shook down a foreign leader? We know the previous admin was covertly overthrowing govts and using the vp name to obtain goodies for his son.
" I would like you to do us a favor". Without an announcement of an investigation, not an actual investigation, Trump was going to withhold aid. This isn`t about Obama or anyone named Biden. Do you have anything else?
If you are prepared to be just as critical of any future Dimm POTUS and have the same kind of impeachment process for any similar incidents moving forward, I supposed this is the Washington we have to live with.

Next Dimm POTUS should be impeached. They stole the election!
 

Golfing Gator

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
49,523
Reaction score
6,207
Points
1,870
Location
Midwest of America
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....
Thanks for admitting you lied about him being a Dem witness.

Your surrender is accepted.
 

ColonelAngus

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
21,444
Reaction score
4,153
Points
290
It’s a shame that the next Dimm to become POTUS stole the election and must be impeached.

So solemn and somber.
 

August West

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,500
Reaction score
1,113
Points
290
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.
You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.
She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.
 

BuckToothMoron

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2016
Messages
9,717
Reaction score
1,745
Points
290
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.
You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.
She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.
Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?
 

August West

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,500
Reaction score
1,113
Points
290
It’s a shame that the next Dimm to become POTUS stole the election and must be impeached.

So solemn and somber.
It`s a shame that you`ve been reduced to incoherent babbling. Why do you all want to talk about past and future Dem presidents?
 

August West

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,500
Reaction score
1,113
Points
290
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.

:p

Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.
You don’t have to be a constitutional expert to know there was no impeachable offense and the entire impeachment and trial will be completely partisan. Partisan by Dems to impeach, and partisan by the Republicans to acquit.

I don’t think Nancy wanted to impeach, but rather was forced to by members of her party, especially those 4 snatches.
She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.
Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?
He wasn`t asking for an investigation but only an announcement of one. Get it?
 

iceberg

Gold Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
24,832
Reaction score
3,501
Points
290
Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.
Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess. :p

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....
Thanks for admitting you lied about him being a Dem witness.

Your surrender is accepted.
he doesn't seem to take one side over the other in looking at his background. considered a liberal democrat at times but again, who's side is he on doesn't come up easily or quickly.

that said - he was 100% a Repub witness regardless of his background. our friend here gets emotionally involved and starts using words as he'd like them to be, not as they are, it would seem.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top