Defense Industry Whores Release Nuclear Iran Ad To Scare America

[IlarMeilyr]

Funny how libs think every repub President is just itching to nuke someone but have faith in true madmen.

Repubs want war, not necessarily to nuke anyone.

Democraps want peace at all cost, not necessarily the salvation of Israel or America.

 

[occupied]

So let's hand em out nobody will eeefff with anyone. Rrrrriiigghhttttt

We have repeatedly tried to make ourselves the arbiter of who gets a Bomb and who doesn't and failed, N Korea, Pakistan and India all developed a weapon over our objections. If Iran does not have the right to it's own defense then no one does. I do not buy this scare tactic that they are trying to build one to use it on Israel therefore inviting their utter destruction. It does not make a lick of sense even for Iran.

Iran has shown to be a bit irrational,yep we should just sit back and wait,and hope they don't use one?
rather foolish

So why are we not bombing the **** out of N Korea then? No one is more irrational then that. They have them, they know we will obliterate them if they use them offensively so MAD has again frozen a conflict in place and prevented a shooting war. The concept works, I do not blame Iran one bit for trying to get a bomb because they get threatened with attack and invasion nearly every day of the week.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Funny how libs think every repub President is just itching to nuke someone but have faith in true madmen.

Repubs want war, not necessarily to nuke anyone.

Oh please.....libs had a cow when Reagan put nukes in Europe....Had friends tell me constantly Bush was going to go nuke.........no doubt we should disarm though right......

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Most of us that aren't bias saw this scare tactic used last election and saw the weakest politician Biden win a debate about it while laughing.

This fear mongering seems to be what the Right is hoping to run on again. (change is bad lol.......)

Get the Christian Americans so scared to death they have no options..

Why would Christians be afraid of a nuclear Iran? If they get nuked they go to heaven. Wanna make an ad to scare people about a nuclear-armed Iran direct it to the rational atheists like myself. Death scares me because I believe that's the end of everything.

 

[Manonthestreet]

So let's hand em out nobody will eeefff with anyone. Rrrrriiigghhttttt

We have repeatedly tried to make ourselves the arbiter of who gets a Bomb and who doesn't and failed, N Korea, Pakistan and India all developed a weapon over our objections. If Iran does not have the right to it's own defense then no one does. I do not buy this scare tactic that they are trying to build one to use it on Israel therefore inviting their utter destruction. It does not make a lick of sense even for Iran.

Iran has shown to be a bit irrational,yep we should just sit back and wait,and hope they don't use one?
rather foolish

So why are we not bombing the **** out of N Korea then? No one is more irrational then that. They have them, they know we will obliterate them if they use them offensively so MAD has again frozen a conflict in place and prevented a shooting war. The concept works, I do not blame Iran one bit for trying to get a bomb because they get threatened with attack and invasion nearly every day of the week.

Why should we be..........

 

[CowboyTed]

So let's hand em out nobody will eeefff with anyone. Rrrrriiigghhttttt

We have repeatedly tried to make ourselves the arbiter of who gets a Bomb and who doesn't and failed, N Korea, Pakistan and India all developed a weapon over our objections. If Iran does not have the right to it's own defense then no one does. I do not buy this scare tactic that they are trying to build one to use it on Israel therefore inviting their utter destruction. It does not make a lick of sense even for Iran.

Iran has shown to be a bit irrational,yep we should just sit back and wait,and hope they don't use one?
rather foolish

When has Iran been shown to be more irrational than US?

 

[007]

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

If Japan had had nukes we would have never dared nuke them.

That's purely conjecture on your part, certainly not fact.

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

There were a lot personal weapons in Iraq and that didn't deter us.

Really? How many? As many as America? No. Not even by a small fraction.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Most of us that aren't bias saw this scare tactic used last election and saw the weakest politician Biden win a debate about it while laughing.



This fear mongering seems to be what the Right is hoping to run on again. (change is bad lol.......)

Get the Christian Americans so scared to death they have no options..

Why would Christians be afraid of a nuclear Iran? If they get nuked they go to heaven. Wanna make an ad to scare people about a nuclear-armed Iran direct it to the rational atheists like myself. Death scares me because I believe that's the end of everything. [/QUOTE
t

You would fit right in a State dept with deep thinking like that

 

[TheOldSchool]

Funny how libs think every repub President is just itching to nuke someone but have faith in true madmen.

Repubs want war, not necessarily to nuke anyone.

Democraps want peace at all cost, not necessarily the salvation of Israel or America.

Stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

There were a lot personal weapons in Iraq and that didn't deter us.

US doesn't get invaded because there's two great big oceans seperating us from our enemies. If we were connected by land to our enemies things would be very different.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

If Japan had had nukes we would have never dared nuke them.

That's purely conjecture on your part, certainly not fact.

Well your opinion there is also purely conjecture because we'll never know. But I'll point out that Russia and America never nuked each other during the cold war because they didn't dare risk consequences.

And the radioactivity in Hiroshima and Nagasaki dissipated very quickly. Nuclear bombs are not the same as nuclear reactor meltdowns. Invaders could have very easily come ashore onto Japan if they'd wanted to.

 

[occupied]

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

If Japan had had nukes we would have never dared nuke them.

That's purely conjecture on your part, certainly not fact.

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

There were a lot personal weapons in Iraq and that didn't deter us.

Really? How many? As many as America? No. Not even by a small fraction.

Nearly every household had at least one AK and nearly all the small arms owned by the Iraqi military were looted by the population, they do not prevent invasion but they do make pacification difficult.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Funny how libs think every repub President is just itching to nuke someone but have faith in true madmen.

Repubs want war, not necessarily to nuke anyone.

Democraps want peace at all cost, not necessarily the salvation of Israel or America.

Stop embarrassing yourself.

I haven't. I leave that to idiots like you.

And by the way: carry on ya dopey old asshole!

 

[007]

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

There were a lot personal weapons in Iraq and that didn't deter us.

US doesn't get invaded because there's two great big oceans seperating us from our enemies. If we were connected by land to our enemies things would be very different.

That may play a part, but it certainly isn't entirely why, because we have land to our north and south by which to be invaded.

CITIZEN GUN OWNERSHIP are the biggest reason why we've never been invaded, and the reason why we never will be either.

 

[007]

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

If Japan had had nukes we would have never dared nuke them.

That's purely conjecture on your part, certainly not fact.

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

There were a lot personal weapons in Iraq and that didn't deter us.

Really? How many? As many as America? No. Not even by a small fraction.

Nearly every household had at least one AK and nearly all the small arms owned by the Iraqi military were looted by the population, they do not prevent invasion but they do make pacification difficult.

Prove it.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Saudi will want them if they don't alrdy have them, Japan, Philippines.....Viet Nam.......sure Chinese wouldn't mind at all.......

 

[Preacher]

I would be more afraid of Israel and its loose cannon way of doing things.

 

[Manonthestreet]

So when did libs suddenly become pro nuke........ World is gonna be so much more peaceful.......don't ya think

 

[IlarMeilyr]

I would be more afraid of Israel and its loose cannon way of doing things.

Yes. You would be.

 

[007]

Just extrapolating your nonsense

It's not nonsense, no one ***** with the nuclear powers because having a Bomb is the most effective deterrent to invasion ever invented.

You're a little whacked out and confused here... because we dropped nukes on Japan and yet never INVADED them, and most likely that is what any other nation would do as well, because one, there's nothing left, and two, the remaining radio activity would kill the invaders. So having nukes is NOT that effective of a deterrent to INVASION.

Now, to point out the nine hundred pound gorilla in the room, the MOST EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO INVASION is an ARMED NATION, such as America. THAT is why we've never been invaded, and why we never will be invaded, because practically our entire populace is ARMED.

If Japan had had nukes we would have never dared nuke them.

That's purely conjecture on your part, certainly not fact.

Well your opinion there is also purely conjecture because we'll never know. But I'll point out that Russia and America never nuked each other during the cold war because they didn't dare risk consequences.

And the radioactivity in Hiroshima and Nagasaki dissipated very quickly. Nuclear bombs are not the same as nuclear reactor meltdowns. Invaders could have very easily come ashore onto Japan if they'd wanted to.

I'm not giving you an opinion. I'm giving you the facts.

And don't tell me there isn't massive radiation that lingers for decades after a nuclear bomb. Ever heard of a little island called Bikini Atol? Read how long it lasted there... Bikini History