USAF 2023
Gold Member
- Feb 22, 2012
- 9,647
- 2,852
- 160
Notice what’s NOT there? Nasser closing the Straits to Israel and BRAGGING to the world he was going to destroy the “ Zionist entity “.Background on 6 day war from Moishe Dayan.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Notice what’s NOT there? Nasser closing the Straits to Israel and BRAGGING to the world he was going to destroy the “ Zionist entity “.Background on 6 day war from Moishe Dayan.
Not going to get any! Keeps blabbering incoherently about “ negotiations “Where is the background from Nasser?
Notice what’s NOT there? Nasser closing the Straits to Israel and BRAGGING to the world he was going to destroy the “ Zionist entity “.![]()
Why do you lie denying Nasser closed the Straits? Keep asking you what the “ purpose “ of the “ summit “ was and there is no responseNasser's army was in Yemen fighting the civil war from 1962-1970.
Nasser had called for a summit to discuss the straits of Tiran and find a solution.
Look at context you idiot.Why do you lie denying Nasser closed the Straits? Keep asking you what the “ purpose “ of the “ summit “ was and there is no response
You’re the Moron. STILL can’t answer my questions Keep Lying, making a fool of yourself and denying Nasser closed the Straits STILL can’t tell us what the purpose of the “ Summit “ wasLook at context you idiot.
Israel provoke Syria, Lebanon and Egypt for a decade..
They wanted more land
The United Arab Republic had a good legal case for restricting traffic through the Strait of Tiran. First it is debatable whether international law confers any right of innocent passage through such a waterway.... [Secondly]... a right of innocent passage is not a right of free passage for any cargo at any time. In the words of the Convention on the Territorial Sea: 'Passage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state... taking the facts as they were I, as an international lawyer, would rather defend before the International Court of Justice the legality of the U.A.R's action in closing the Strait of Tiran than to argue the other side of the case...[33]You’re the Moron. STILL can’t answer my questions Keep Lying, making a fool of yourself and denying Nasser closed the Straits STILL can’t tell us what the purpose of the “ Summit “ was
Here's some background on the Six Day War from a reliable and honorable source.
![]()
DAYAN IN 1976: ISRAEL TOOK GOLAN OUT OF GREED
Thirty years after Israel conquered the Golan Heights from Syria, in what Israelis have said was an entirely defensive operation, the defense minister at the time, Moshe Dayan, has been quoted as s…www.sun-sentinel.com
May 04, 1997
TEL AVIV - — Thirty years after Israel conquered the Golan Heights from Syria, in what Israelis have said was an entirely defensive operation, the defense minister at the time, Moshe Dayan, has been quoted as saying that the capture was largely the product of greed.
In frank and startling conversations held in 1976 and printed for the first time last week, Dayan is quoted as saying that kibbutz leaders from Galilee persuaded the prime minister at the time, Levi Eshkol, to attack the Golan on the fourth day of the 1967 Six-Day War because they wanted the land.
The standard Israeli justification for the battle of the Golan has been that Syrian troops had been relentlessly shelling Israelis and that the situation had grown intolerable.
This is what Dayan said nine years later:
"The Syrians opposite them were soldiers who shot at them, and they certainly didn't like that. But I can say with absolute certainty that the delegation that came to convince Eshkol to ascend the Golan did not think about these things. They thought about the land of the Golan.
"I know what went on. I saw them and I spoke with them. They didn't even try to hide their lust for that soil. That's what guided them."
Those and other of Dayan's thoughts were set down on paper in 1976 by Rami Tal as they sat in Dayan's Tel Aviv garden. Tal, now a senior editor at the publishing house for the newspaper Yediot Aharonot, asked permission to record Dayan's words.
Dayan agreed on condition that they not be published without his permission. Tal, who printed them in Yediot Aharonot's Passover supplement last week, said that after Dayan died in 1981, the transcripts sat in a drawer for 15 years.
Last year, he showed them to Yossi Ginossar, a former high official in the Shin Bet security service and a confidant of Dayan's who urged that they be published. Tal sought permission from Dayan's daughter, Yael, who also agreed they were of great historical importance and should be published.
Apart from his assertion about the cause of the Golan battle, Dayan also spoke of the Syrian attacks on the Israeli kibbutzim and asserted that they were the result of Israeli aggression.
Continued
Nasser's army was in Yemen fighting the civil war from 1962-1970.
Nasser had called for a summit to discuss the straits of Tiran and find a solution.
Look at context you idiot.
Israel provoke Syria, Lebanon and Egypt for a decade..
They wanted more land
Please tell us why “ International Law” is debatable. “ Please tell us how Israel was using the Straits in a “ confrontational way” Why did he send the UN “ peacekeepers “ away? He knew there would be a problem and he got itThe United Arab Republic had a good legal case for restricting traffic through the Strait of Tiran. First it is debatable whether international law confers any right of innocent passage through such a waterway.... [Secondly]... a right of innocent passage is not a right of free passage for any cargo at any time. In the words of the Convention on the Territorial Sea: 'Passage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state... taking the facts as they were I, as an international lawyer, would rather defend before the International Court of Justice the legality of the U.A.R's action in closing the Strait of Tiran than to argue the other side of the case...[33]
Nasser's army was in Yemen fighting the civil war from 1962-1970.
He picked a bad time to fuck around and find out.
At least the troops in Yemen didn't get their asses kicked by Israel.
Nasser had called for a summit to discuss the straits of Tiran and find a solution.
Maybe he shouldn't have blockaded the straits and talked so tough? What a loser.
Remember 9/11 or Oct. 7? Those were not 70 years ago.Do you remember the Lavon Affair.. Israel planted bombs to kill Americans and blame Arabs.. that lead to the Suez Crisis.
The Syrians on the Golan heights had been shelling those Kibbutz for years, as for the Kibbutzim wanting the land to farm on, explain to me how you plan to farm on 60% slopes that were mostly rock.Here's some background on the Six Day War from a reliable and honorable source.
![]()
DAYAN IN 1976: ISRAEL TOOK GOLAN OUT OF GREED
Thirty years after Israel conquered the Golan Heights from Syria, in what Israelis have said was an entirely defensive operation, the defense minister at the time, Moshe Dayan, has been quoted as s…www.sun-sentinel.com
May 04, 1997
TEL AVIV - — Thirty years after Israel conquered the Golan Heights from Syria, in what Israelis have said was an entirely defensive operation, the defense minister at the time, Moshe Dayan, has been quoted as saying that the capture was largely the product of greed.
In frank and startling conversations held in 1976 and printed for the first time last week, Dayan is quoted as saying that kibbutz leaders from Galilee persuaded the prime minister at the time, Levi Eshkol, to attack the Golan on the fourth day of the 1967 Six-Day War because they wanted the land.
The standard Israeli justification for the battle of the Golan has been that Syrian troops had been relentlessly shelling Israelis and that the situation had grown intolerable.
This is what Dayan said nine years later:
"The Syrians opposite them were soldiers who shot at them, and they certainly didn't like that. But I can say with absolute certainty that the delegation that came to convince Eshkol to ascend the Golan did not think about these things. They thought about the land of the Golan.
"I know what went on. I saw them and I spoke with them. They didn't even try to hide their lust for that soil. That's what guided them."
Those and other of Dayan's thoughts were set down on paper in 1976 by Rami Tal as they sat in Dayan's Tel Aviv garden. Tal, now a senior editor at the publishing house for the newspaper Yediot Aharonot, asked permission to record Dayan's words.
Dayan agreed on condition that they not be published without his permission. Tal, who printed them in Yediot Aharonot's Passover supplement last week, said that after Dayan died in 1981, the transcripts sat in a drawer for 15 years.
Last year, he showed them to Yossi Ginossar, a former high official in the Shin Bet security service and a confidant of Dayan's who urged that they be published. Tal sought permission from Dayan's daughter, Yael, who also agreed they were of great historical importance and should be published.
Apart from his assertion about the cause of the Golan battle, Dayan also spoke of the Syrian attacks on the Israeli kibbutzim and asserted that they were the result of Israeli aggression.
Continued
No, they were punishing terrorists who were raiding into Israel.Israel regularly carried out incursions into Lebanon and Syria. They wanted more land and water assets.
The Egyptians, Syrians, Jordanians, Iraqis and Saudis were massing on Israel's borders preparing to launch an offensive war. The Israeli's simply acted preemptively a couple of days before the Arabs were prepared to launch their attacks.The Egyptian army was deployed in Yemen from 1962-1970. They were not attacking Israel.