rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 297,935
- 220,049
- 3,615
David for Republican Nancies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...
What next? Put an NC-17 rating on tours through the Sistine Chapel because there are naked people in the ceiling?
...
They must get cold up there at night.
Would you begrudge this masterpiece being appreciated by students if he were sporting cargo pants?Should Michelangelo's famous classical sculpture David be viewed in sixth grade class? I say no. There is no need for this. There are many other famous artworks other than this that can be presented to children that young. It should be a parent's decision and it should not happen in school at this age. This is just another form of subtle indoctrination by the left, who will stop at nothing to sexualize children.
![]()
Florida Principal Out After Viewing Of Michelangelo's 'David' Upsets Parents
One parent reportedly called the masterpiece "pornographic."www.yahoo.com
Young children should not be shown nudity. I agree and most Americans agree that David is not pornography but it depends on who is observing it. A woman's body is also a work of art but we don't let teachers show Playboy magazines to young children.Would you begrudge this masterpiece being appreciated by students if he were sporting cargo pants?
Of course, the old biddies who get in a tizzy over artistic treasures merely promote what they rage against as being pornographic.
View attachment 770451
"God would not have given Adam a tallywhacker
to hide if he didn't think it was filthy."
Some, apparently, need to project prurient interest onto 6th graders viewing an artistic masterpiece.Young children should not be shown nudity. I agree and most Americans agree that David is not pornography but it depends on who is observing it. A woman's body is also a work of art but we don't let teachers show Playboy magazines to young children.
Should Michelangelo's famous classical sculpture David be viewed in sixth grade class?
Some, apparently, need to project prurient interest onto 6th graders viewing an artistic masterpiece.
Other might consider the depiction of a naked man being crucified inappropriate for adolescents.
The David statue is porn? Really? Then why was it commissioned to be displayed in a CHURCH, as well as is considered one of the premier examples of art? Please...............give us your definition of "porn", I'd be interested to hear it.
There is no biblical account of a loin cloth. It is apocryphal. According to Christian scripture, "they divided up his clothes."But all the pictures of that hide his tiny bits.
Young kids don't need schools to determine they can see nudity.Some, apparently, need to project prurient interest onto 6th graders viewing an artistic masterpiece.
Other might consider the depiction of a naked man being crucified inappropriate for adolescents.
There is no biblical account of a loin cloth. It is apocryphal. According to Christian scripture, "they divided up his clothes."
Young kids don't need schools to determine they can see nudity.
Well, the female form is also art. So, we should let young children see Playboy magazines. After all, their pictures of nudity are tasteful and art.Of course it should.
Children around the world learn about it a much younger age.
Well, the female form is also art. So, we should let young children see Playboy magazines. After all, their pictures of nudity are tasteful and art.
We're talking about sixth graders. They don't need schools arbitrarily deciding to show them nudity.It is a statue. Your hang ups with nudity should not be foisted on to others.
But YOUR views should be?It is a statue. Your hang ups with nudity should not be foisted on to others.
But YOUR views should be?