David And The Sixth Graders

David for Republican Nancies

1679623780195.jpeg
 

ROME (AP) — The Florence museum housing Michelangelo’s Renaissance masterpiece the David on Sunday invited parents and students from a Florida charter school to visit after complaints about a lesson featuring the statue forced the principal to resign.

Florence Mayor Dario Nardella also tweeted an invitation for the principal to visit so he can personally honor her. Confusing art with pornography was “ridiculous,” Nardella said.


Is the David porn? Come see, Italians tell Florida parents
 
I'm still wondering how anyone could confuse the statue of David with porn.

In porn, the male participants (actors) are generally males who are rather well endowed.

David's junk is a bit on the small side.
 
Should Michelangelo's famous classical sculpture David be viewed in sixth grade class? I say no. There is no need for this. There are many other famous artworks other than this that can be presented to children that young. It should be a parent's decision and it should not happen in school at this age. This is just another form of subtle indoctrination by the left, who will stop at nothing to sexualize children.


Would you begrudge this masterpiece being appreciated by students if he were sporting cargo pants?

Of course, the old biddies who get in a tizzy over artistic treasures merely promote what they rage against as being pornographic.


Screen Shot 2023-03-28 at 7.07.08 PM.png

"God would not have given Adam a tallywhacker
to hide if he didn't think it was filthy."
 
Would you begrudge this masterpiece being appreciated by students if he were sporting cargo pants?

Of course, the old biddies who get in a tizzy over artistic treasures merely promote what they rage against as being pornographic.


View attachment 770451
"God would not have given Adam a tallywhacker
to hide if he didn't think it was filthy."
Young children should not be shown nudity. I agree and most Americans agree that David is not pornography but it depends on who is observing it. A woman's body is also a work of art but we don't let teachers show Playboy magazines to young children.
 
Young children should not be shown nudity. I agree and most Americans agree that David is not pornography but it depends on who is observing it. A woman's body is also a work of art but we don't let teachers show Playboy magazines to young children.
Some, apparently, need to project prurient interest onto 6th graders viewing an artistic masterpiece.

Other might consider the depiction of a naked man being crucified inappropriate for adolescents.
 
Some, apparently, need to project prurient interest onto 6th graders viewing an artistic masterpiece.

Other might consider the depiction of a naked man being crucified inappropriate for adolescents.

But all the pictures of that hide his tiny bits.
 
The David statue is porn? Really? Then why was it commissioned to be displayed in a CHURCH, as well as is considered one of the premier examples of art? Please...............give us your definition of "porn", I'd be interested to hear it.

Sarcasm escapes you.
 
Some, apparently, need to project prurient interest onto 6th graders viewing an artistic masterpiece.

Other might consider the depiction of a naked man being crucified inappropriate for adolescents.
Young kids don't need schools to determine they can see nudity.
 
There is no biblical account of a loin cloth. It is apocryphal. According to Christian scripture, "they divided up his clothes."

Oh, I do disagree. But Christians in this country have always added clothing. Prudes will be prudish.
 
Well, the female form is also art. So, we should let young children see Playboy magazines. After all, their pictures of nudity are tasteful and art.

So, now you are comparing one of the most famous pieces of art in history to Playboy.

Wow.
 

Forum List

Back
Top