Darwinism

zaangalewa

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
7,508
Reaction score
379
Points
140
But Christians do not modify information -
Wow are you confused.

Seriously, that seems to be their main occupation.

(Most of us call it lying)
But Christians do not modify information -
Wow are you confused.

Seriously, that seems to be their main occupation.

(Most of us call it lying)
I don't have any idea what kind of "we" identity all this people "like you" have, who use the words "we" and "us". I spoke with james bond about elementary structures of the Christian faith - and you, I guess you are an atheist, calls me a liar now, because it is evident for you that all Christians are evil. Do you think it is my duty now to change your prejudices or whatelse is the reason why you say this to me?
 
Last edited:

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
7,866
Reaction score
617
Points
155
Okay. You are not a Christian. You modfied what I said, so it was more easy now for you to speak bullshit here. And the reason for this is to deny truth. But Christians do not modify information - also not in case if there exist contradictions - because this would be similiar to the idea to try to modify the word of god (which is creation). And a real Christian never tries to deny any truth (or opinion, which could be true) - because god is the truth.
This is about S&T and that's why I said rocks and fossils do not last that long due to weathering, chemical reactions, and pressure. Darwin is the one who needed 4.5 billion years and no one has seen what that does to a planet. Even Darwin died before Earth was falsely deemed to be 4.5 billion years old. It's ridiculous. For one, we would have lost our magnetic field. It's you who speaks bullshit and judges others who are Christians. Satan's evolution has no scientific method backing it up. Absolutely none.
 
Last edited:

zaangalewa

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
7,508
Reaction score
379
Points
140
What an "intelligent" sentence.
Correct. It is. The "stupid" discussion you pointed out only exists because of the stupid side of it: the creationists.
What a luck that you know what evolution is, do you?

All Jews, Christians and Muslims believe in creatio
Again...please pay attention, you are wasting my time...the problem isn't that they believe in creation. The problem is with people who believe in a young earth and no evolution. Get it?
No.
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
41,512
Reaction score
4,006
Points
1,855
What a luck that you know what evolution is, do you?
Luck? No, that came by effort. I don't thank mystical forces for stuff. Like, meals. Or knowledge.

Do I know evolution? Compared to whom? I know it fairly well. Why, is there a quiz?

Re: evolution vs creationism

If the creationist were to agree that evolution is true, there would be no debate. "Creation, using evolution". The stupid side of the debate you labeled as stupid (and i agree) is the side that rejects evolution, and it is not defined simply by accepting creationism.
 

zaangalewa

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
7,508
Reaction score
379
Points
140
Okay. You are not a Christian. You modfied what I said, so it was more easy now for you to speak bullshit here. And the reason for this is to deny truth. But Christians do not modify information - also not in case if there exist contradictions - because this would be similiar to the idea to try to modify the word of god (which is creation). And a real Christian never tries to deny any truth (or opinion, which could be true) - because god is the truth.
This is about S&T and that's why I said rocks and fossils do not last that long due to weathering, chemical reactions, and pressure. Darwin is the one who needed 4.5 billion years and no one has seen what that does to a planet. Even Darwin died before Earth was falsely deemed to be 4.5 billion years old. It's ridiculous. For one, we would have lost our magnetic field. It's you who speaks bullshit and judges others who are Christians. Satan's evolution has no scientific method backing it up. Absolutely none.
Your grandpa from the species Dickinsonia is about 550 million years old. Your grandma of this species too - although normally I do not speak about the age of ladies. But 550 million years is quite young compared with some billion years of the age of our universe.
 
Last edited:

zaangalewa

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
7,508
Reaction score
379
Points
140
What a luck that you know what evolution is, do you?
Luck? No, that came by effort. I don't thank mystical forces for stuff. Like, meals. Or knowledge.

Do I know evolution? Compared to whom? I know it fairly well. Why, is there a quiz?

Re: evolution vs creationism

If the creationist were to agree that evolution is true, there would be no debate. "Creation, using evolution". The stupid side of the debate you labeled as stupid (and i agree) is the side that rejects evolution, and it is not defined simply by accepting creationism.
Let me say it in this way: The knowledge of the most "evolutionists" in the anglo-american internet is damned bad. Someone would be an idiot, who would trust in this nonsense. What doesn't mean the real scientific theory of biological evolution is wrong.
 

zaangalewa

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
7,508
Reaction score
379
Points
140
james bond

Think about three different time schemes:

(1) Everything was here within the very first plank-second.
(2) Everything needed a nearly endless number of long years to evolve or to be done.
(3) G'd made everything in some of his days

You are not able to bring this schemes into the same continuum? You are not alone!


And behold, the Lord passed by, and a great
and strong wind tore the mountains and broke
in pieces the rocks before the Lord, but the Lord
was not in the wind. And after the wind an
earthquake, but the Lord was not in the
earthquake. And after the earthquake
a fire, but the Lord was not in the fire.
And after the fire the sound of a low whisper.
 
Last edited:

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
41,512
Reaction score
4,006
Points
1,855
The knowledge of the most "evolutionists" in the anglo-american internet is damned bad.
Okay. But that doesn't have any bearing on the truth of evolution.


Someone would be an idiot, who would trust in this nonsense.
Thank goodness nobody is asking you to trust them. Not even them. What is this delusion?
 

zaangalewa

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
7,508
Reaction score
379
Points
140
The knowledge of the most "evolutionists" in the anglo-american internet is damned bad.
Okay. But that doesn't have any bearing on the truth of evolution.
I said everyone would be an idiot, who would believe all this nonsense, which is said under the expression "evolution". And others say nonsense by using the word "creation". And both together- let me call them here now "the knowers of god and the believers in natural science" make an absolutelly disorienting nonsense.

Someone would be an idiot, who would trust in this nonsense.
Thank goodness nobody is asking you to trust them. Not even them. What is this delusion?
I do not understand what you like to say with this words. Take for example an expression like "the evolution of cars". Nothing evolves (in sense of the theory of evolution) in case of cars. We make this machines - that's all. Our knowledge and our abilities to make such machines grows. That's not a product of the theory of evolution - that's a product of inspirations and intentions, of ideas and plans.

 
Last edited:

ChemEngineer

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
497
Points
200
I read a post by James Bond which referenced Hollie who is for very good reason on my Ignore List. So I had to click on the link to show what Hollie had written. That took me eventually to this thread of mendacity:

It's truly disturbing when creationists are relegated to offering nothing more than ignorant claims that "Darwinism is racism" being the root cause of societal decay. It's a total abandonment of any ethical standard on the part of "religious" zealots.
No, people of faith offer a very great deal more than "ignorant claims that 'Darwinism is racism' being the root cause of societal decay. How dare you speak of ethical standards when you godless leftists have none, from abortion on demand, to socialism, to race warfare to promoting homosexuality and transgender insanity.

It's a common tactic of creationists to raise the issue of ethics in relation to evolution. It's a common tactic to claim ''Darwinisn'' is the root of evil. The issue that fundies try to sidestep is that evolutionary science, along with all other science, is ethically neutral. What fundies also try to sidestep is that their religions of fear and superstition can be the true culprits in terms of creating maladjusted personalities.
Godless leftists are disproportionately more maladjusted than people of faith. You Leftists marry less, go to the dark side more, give less, think less, and boast of your intellectual and moral superiority more than the rest of humanity combined, when in fact your personal attributes have nothing to do with the conversation. But you insist on making yourselves the center of any discussion.

Biological science will identify that the fittest organism within a particular environment is more likely to survive.
This is not "biological science." It is Darwin's Trivial Tautology. Don't flatter yourself.

So the game is played by religionists that ''Darwinism'' (aside from being a corrupting force in society), is the root of all insidious forces that corrupt humanity.
Absurd, and demonstrably incorrect. "Darwinism" originated in the mid-nineteenth century.
Was there NO "corrupting force in society" before the mid-nineteenth century? Please stop your incessant silliness. You embarrass yourself even as you feign intellectualism and scientific acumen which you fail to demonstrate on even a casual level.

It may be the last, desperate tactic of fundie zealots to denigrate science. Effectively, science is the fundie boogyman.
The list of Jews who have been awarded Nobel Prizes in the sciences exposes your hateful, ignorant mendacity.

Your endless lies are refuted here, so named to attract godless Leftists like moths to a candle: http://ProofThereIsNoGod.blogspot.com
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
35,783
Reaction score
3,479
Points
1,115
I read a post by James Bond which referenced Hollie who is for very good reason on my Ignore List. So I had to click on the link to show what Hollie had written. That took me eventually to this thread of mendacity:

It's truly disturbing when creationists are relegated to offering nothing more than ignorant claims that "Darwinism is racism" being the root cause of societal decay. It's a total abandonment of any ethical standard on the part of "religious" zealots.
No, people of faith offer a very great deal more than "ignorant claims that 'Darwinism is racism' being the root cause of societal decay. How dare you speak of ethical standards when you godless leftists have none, from abortion on demand, to socialism, to race warfare to promoting homosexuality and transgender insanity.

It's a common tactic of creationists to raise the issue of ethics in relation to evolution. It's a common tactic to claim ''Darwinisn'' is the root of evil. The issue that fundies try to sidestep is that evolutionary science, along with all other science, is ethically neutral. What fundies also try to sidestep is that their religions of fear and superstition can be the true culprits in terms of creating maladjusted personalities.
Godless leftists are disproportionately more maladjusted than people of faith. You Leftists marry less, go to the dark side more, give less, think less, and boast of your intellectual and moral superiority more than the rest of humanity combined, when in fact your personal attributes have nothing to do with the conversation. But you insist on making yourselves the center of any discussion.

Biological science will identify that the fittest organism within a particular environment is more likely to survive.
This is not "biological science." It is Darwin's Trivial Tautology. Don't flatter yourself.

So the game is played by religionists that ''Darwinism'' (aside from being a corrupting force in society), is the root of all insidious forces that corrupt humanity.
Absurd, and demonstrably incorrect. "Darwinism" originated in the mid-nineteenth century.
Was there NO "corrupting force in society" before the mid-nineteenth century? Please stop your incessant silliness. You embarrass yourself even as you feign intellectualism and scientific acumen which you fail to demonstrate on even a casual level.

It may be the last, desperate tactic of fundie zealots to denigrate science. Effectively, science is the fundie boogyman.
The list of Jews who have been awarded Nobel Prizes in the sciences exposes your hateful, ignorant mendacity.

Your endless lies are refuted here, so named to attract godless Leftists like moths to a candle: http://ProofThereIsNoGod.blogspot.com
Obviously, you don't have me on ignore. The gods will punish you for such falsehoods,

What exactly is ''Darwinism''? Other than a slogan that appears on fundie websites, can you tell us what it means?

You linked to someone's personal blog as apparent proof of your gods. Isn't that clever!
 

harmonica

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
27,666
Reaction score
4,940
Points
290
Darwinism is a racist ideology....,
...but evolution is science.
Evolution is false science. Darwin only explained how ToE worked and did not invent it contrary to popular belief. Darwin was only right about natural selection. Actually, Christian Alfred Russel Wallace was only right about natural selection.

Darwin ended up promoting "survival of the fittest" which to him meant that there were superior species instead of species changing in order to survive. It means I am better than you and the lighter the skin the better. It made Darwin a rich man.

Darwinism led to social Darwinism, eugenics (created by Darwin's cousin Frances Galton whom Darwin supported), Nazism, Hitler, the Holocaust, black genocide, Planned Parenthood, and worse things.

We may not have WW III in our lifetimes, but we may experience race wars due to Darwin.
and creation is just bullshit
 

harmonica

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
27,666
Reaction score
4,940
Points
290
Darwinism is a racist ideology....,
...but evolution is science.
Evolution is false science. Darwin only explained how ToE worked and did not invent it contrary to popular belief. Darwin was only right about natural selection. Actually, Christian Alfred Russel Wallace was only right about natural selection.

Darwin ended up promoting "survival of the fittest" which to him meant that there were superior species instead of species changing in order to survive. It means I am better than you and the lighter the skin the better. It made Darwin a rich man.

Darwinism led to social Darwinism, eugenics (created by Darwin's cousin Frances Galton whom Darwin supported), Nazism, Hitler, the Holocaust, black genocide, Planned Parenthood, and worse things.

We may not have WW III in our lifetimes, but we may experience race wars due to Darwin.
and creation is just bullshit
Did you not evolve this "argument" or did you not create it?
creation is just bullshit
 

zaangalewa

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
7,508
Reaction score
379
Points
140
... creation is just bullshit
And what do you expect could someone say to you now? What unkind of argument do you like to hear?
sorry--I've tried to be polite, but you christians are not .....
That's also a dead sentence without the possibility to give an answer or to argue. Sounds like "I've tried to be a kangaroo, but you Christians are not."

By the way. The very most Christians have absolutely not any problem with the theory of evolution - in contextes, where this has nothing to do with racism or similar "theories".


 
Last edited:

ReinyDays

Silver Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
2,796
Reaction score
772
Points
90
Location
State of Jefferson
As far as I heard Darwin stole a lot from Alfred Russel Wallace. And what about the idea that thieves sometimes don't like to believe in god any longer?
Wallace freely sent all his data to Darwin and encouraged Darwin to publish as he did ... there was nothing stolen between the two ...
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top