Damning testimony in Trump Hush Money Trial

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

"In what amounted to incredibly damning testimony, Pecker laid out the 2015 deal he reached with Trump “to help the campaign.” Pecker called the arrangement to publish stories to make Trump look good — and to smear his political rivals — “highly, highly confidential.”

Neat, call me shocked, we already knew Trump team fucked up. Big deal, MAGA got a hard-on, and a cool blond put out. Not fond of his open marriage, but **** it, I like the upside. Cost benefit.

Wow, this Pecker (irony) guy even provided testimony his media built stories to sell Trump. I can't believe an outfit would print BS to help candidates. MAGA.

It's a big game, you try overcoming the left leaning on education, nearly all media, TV, Hollywood, music, unions, govt. work. Even Taylor Swift is coming after the orange-man, the TDS is strong. That's the easy part, because the worst part is the weaponization of justice for monetary and political gain, weakening the system, including that of our rights a citizens, spelled out by our kick-ass founding fathers, with big-ass brains, and God.

Trump trial updates: Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker details efforts to help Trump's 2016 campaign

In what amounted to incredibly damning testimony, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker laid out the 2015 deal he reached with Donald Trump “to help the campaign.”

www.yahoo.com

“My name is Peck!”

 

[Clipper]

Hunters laptop , Hillary's fake Russian Dossier .. does any of that ring any bells for you ? the trial is Marxist banana republic 3 rd world totalitarian lawfare and REAL election interference ..

Hunter & Hillary? Lol. Which one of those two did anything close to what Trump is being charged with? As a matter of fact Hunter has never even run for ANY public office.

 

[john doe 101]

Their vague allegation about “a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election” has me more concerned than ever about their unprecedented use of state law and their persistent avoidance of specifying an election crime or a valid theory of fraud.​

​

​

​

I Thought the Bragg Case Against Trump Was a Legal Embarrassment. Now I Think It’s a Historic Mistake.

From a NY Times Op-Ed. This guy gets it. He sees it even more clearly now, since we heard the joke opening statements by Colangelo, the guy sent by Biden to do the prosecuting for Bragg. About a year ago, when Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, indicted former President Donald...

www.usmessageboard.com

​

Those are the exact criminal charges, dipshit. I dont know what else to tell you. Now get back to your make-believe world.

 

[john doe 101]

Nope. It is a theory.

How Strong Is Bragg’s Case? | National Review

The district attorney doesn’t have a strong case of crime against Trump. He has a mountain of evidence of legal activity that he’s spinning as a ‘conspiracy.’

www.nationalreview.com

Those are the crimes he is charged with. Trump is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

 

[john doe 101]

The hush money isn't a crime unless its to cover up a felony.
Bragg never said what the felony was. We think its some kind of Federal election law violation.

These 34 Bragg charges are total bullshit. There was no crime. Read on...

The Trump Trial in Manhattan is an Indictment of the New York Legal System

Below is my column in the New York Post on the start of the Trump trial today in New York. I have long been critical of the case as a clear example of the weaponization of the criminal justice syst…

jonathanturley.org

Pretty sure those 34 charges are actual crimes, you dumb Red Hatted beast.

 

[Clipper]

LOL

Meanwhile, the MSM runs interference for Dems 24/7/365. Hell, the mess in Niger should be a major story, but the MSM is running cover for the most incompetent administration since at least Jimmy Carter's.

U.S. Troops in Niger Say They’re “Stranded” and Can’t Get Mail, Medicine

U.S. troops in Niger interviewed for a congressional inquiry by Rep. Matt Gaetz’s office said they’re “functionally stranded.”

theintercept.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/04/17/niger-air-force-whistleblower/

The "MSM" has it's hands full covering the orange shit giibon's crime spree. Before & after he was elected as the fake potus.

 

[john doe 101]

Pecker, Trump, and Cohen had a meeting at trump tower. Trump is toast.

 

[excalibur]

Those are the exact criminal charges, dipshit. I dont know what else to tell you. Now get back to your make-believe world.

Nope. And it is laughable that you think you know more than the BU law professor who wrote that article.

 

[excalibur]

The "MSM" has it's hands full covering the orange shit giibon's crime spree. Before & after he was elected as the fake potus.

 

[Independent thinker]

"In what amounted to incredibly damning testimony, Pecker laid out the 2015 deal he reached with Trump “to help the campaign.” Pecker called the arrangement to publish stories to make Trump look good — and to smear his political rivals — “highly, highly confidential.”

Neat, call me shocked, we already knew Trump team fucked up. Big deal, MAGA got a hard-on, and a cool blond put out. Not fond of his open marriage, but **** it, I like the upside. Cost benefit.

Wow, this Pecker (irony) guy even provided testimony his media built stories to sell Trump. I can't believe an outfit would print BS to help candidates. MAGA.

It's a big game, you try overcoming the left leaning on education, nearly all media, TV, Hollywood, music, unions, govt. work. Even Taylor Swift is coming after the orange-man, the TDS is strong. That's the easy part, because the worst part is the weaponization of justice for monetary and political gain, weakening the system, including that of our rights a citizens, spelled out by our kick-ass founding fathers, with big-ass brains, and God.

Trump trial updates: Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker details efforts to help Trump's 2016 campaign

In what amounted to incredibly damning testimony, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker laid out the 2015 deal he reached with Donald Trump “to help the campaign.”

www.yahoo.com

It's not damning at all. Ever since politics started, people have been doing this, including Biden, who buried the fact that he had classified documents just before the 2020 election.

 

[john doe 101]

Nope.

Nothing you say can change the fact that trump is being charged on those 34 counts.

 

[excalibur]

Nothing you say can change the fact that trump is being charged on those 34 counts.

Their vague allegation about “a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election” has me more concerned than ever about their unprecedented use of state law and their persistent avoidance of specifying an election crime or a valid theory of fraud.​

By Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Mr. Shugerman is a law professor at Boston University.

Opinion | I Thought the Bragg Case Against Trump Was a Legal Embarrassment. Now I Think It’s a Historic Mistake.

It’s not the crime; it’s the cover-up. But it’s still a highly flawed case.

www.nytimes.com

 

[IDIOCRACY]

“My name is Peck!”

Really? Cool name

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Nothing you say can change the fact that trump is being charged on those 34 counts.

 

[jknowgood]

34 counts of falsifying business records in the 1st degree are the crimes allegedly committed by trump. Wake up, sleepy.

The media is fixing to stop covering the trail. Because it is actually proving, this is a kangaroo court. Trump needs to be out in New York campaigning, he drew hundreds in Harlem that loved him!

 

[kyzr]

Pretty sure those 34 charges are actual crimes, you dumb Red Hatted beast.

Yes they are. MISDEMEANORS.
So you're too stupid to actually read links and understand the legal issues, duh.

 

[jknowgood]

Hunter & Hillary? Lol. Which one of those two did anything close to what Trump is being charged with? As a matter of fact Hunter has never even run for ANY public office.

You do know the statues of limitations has already giving out?

 

[john doe 101]

Yes they are. MISDEMEANORS.
So you're too stupid to actually read links and understand the legal issues, duh.

Thank you for confirming I was correct.

 

[BluesLegend]

Congress budgeted itself a hush money slush fund for sexual harassment claims...then Dems try to charge Trump with a hush money crime...

 

[cnm]

"Spanky" Trump gave his worshippers too much credit in paying off Daniels. He should have just come clean on the whole deal because you rubes would have voted for the lying bastard anyway.

See?

FFS. Nothing illegal was done. No conspiracy has been charged; try thinking about that if you're capable of doing it.