So its bigoted and racist to marry someone of your own race eh? Sure is MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of racist bigots then all over the world.
No one has said that, have they?
Why is it that the ONLY way trumpanzees can frame a "successful" argument is by creating strawmen?
Penelope said he was a bigot, teaching his kids to be bigots.
No strawman.
Bigotry is first, then racist , I imagine the father is both.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-bigot-and-a-racist
An old friend of mine, her jewish heritage is very important to her.
She limited her dating to jewish men, and eventually found a husband on a jewish dating site.
Was that bigoted and/or racist of her?
That is rather intelligent question coming from you . I'm surprised and impressed although I doubt that you appreciate the complexity of it .
Your one flash of sight, only highlights your normal blindness.
My first thought is- when comparing to the would be judge in the OP is that this is not coercion born of animosity towards those who are of a different belief. It does not indicate that she has any hatred for others but rather, may just want constancy and coherence in her life for herself and any children that she may have. I don't know that she is not a bigot but I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.
So we agree that Jewishness is a valid goal when considering marriage and producing children.
Wow. In the absence of any evidence that she holds bigoted views, (since we agree that Jewishness is a valid goal)
in the absence of any evidence that she hold bigoted views, you are willing to give her the benefit of a doubt.
In my world, I want to see the evidence
before I even start thinking about marginalizing people.
The would be judge in the OP is an entirely different matter. I don't think that any reasonable person would believe that what he did was not motivated by bigotry. He has no business trying to control the blood line and lives of his offspring by dictating them who they can marry , and even if there is some legitimacy to a concern about racial and religious heritage, by insisting that it be someone of the opposite sex destroys that argument since it is clear that he would object to the marriage of his children to a white, Christian homosexual
1. You've already admitted that there is legitimacy to a concern about racial and religious heritage above, with Jewishness. Unless White and Christian is somehow judged by different rules than Jewishness?
That can't be, can it?
2. He obviously has a strong concern for his "racial and religious heritage", which you have admitted is valid. It is likely that he believes his actions, in trying to steer this children to continue it, is in their best interests.
3. Gay marriage is not part of Christian Heritage. There is also the problem of two same sex people producing a child that is biologically, (you admitted validity of racial heritage above) theirs.