DA Alvin Bragg Releases Migrant Taxi Driver Charged for Repeatedly Assaulting Female Passengers

"Probably". We dont even know if she was drunk, and that literally makes no difference. You dont blame HER for being assaulted because she may have been drunk.

Thats just asinine

No, I don't "blame" her, but I can see why Bragg would see this as a shit case he wouldn't want to take to a jury.

Ugly reality. Only 3% of rapists (and this doesn't even qualify as rape) ever see the inside of a jail cell.

The lesser convictions mean his green card will be revoked, and they'll send him back wherever he came from.
 
No, I don't "blame" her, but I can see why Bragg would see this as a shit case he wouldn't want to take to a jury.

Ugly reality. Only 3% of rapists (and this doesn't even qualify as rape) ever see the inside of a jail cell.

The lesser convictions mean his green card will be revoked, and they'll send him back wherever he came from.
Sure, then why didn't you just say THAT instead of saying that its her fault because she might have been drunk?
 
Sure, then why didn't you just say THAT instead of saying that its her fault because she might have been drunk?

Why should I not say the obvious? That someone at 2 AM getting into a cab is probably drunk out of her mind, and isn't a good witness, which is why it was a shit case you plead down to a lesser charge.
 
Why should I not say the obvious? That someone at 2 AM getting into a cab is probably drunk out of her mind, and isn't a good witness, which is why it was a shit case you plead down to a lesser charge.

Oh wow. We've come a long way from "believe all women" haven't we......
 
The woman's name is Maile Bartow. How good could she possibly look?
 
Yep. In days long since gone, it used to be a defense (sort of) to rape prosecutions to contend that the way a woman dressed demonstrated that she was effectively “asking for it.” That included miniskirts and blouses that bared some cleavage. It was a sick and twisted notion then; and, it still is.

The modern day leftists seem to have forgotten that.

Has anyone ever noticed that the Democrats generally hate women?
Only straight, white women.
 
Oh wow. We've come a long way from "believe all women" haven't we......

I never said that, and I always thought it was a stupid thing to say.

Want to hear a bit of liberal heresy? I think that Anita Hill was a lying sack of shit.

Not that Uncle Thomas is justified. He's completely unqualified to be on SCOTUS and kind of an idiot. But nothing in her story made sense.

She worked for Thomas at the Department of Education, and when he transferred to mismanage EEOC, she went with him. This makes no sense. If he was a creep at Dept. of Ed, why would you follow him to a new department for no increase in pay? Frankly, I've had more asshole bosses than good ones. I would never go work for one of the assholes again.
 
Not at all. The courts found against White Privilege Boy twice whining that she was hurting his feelings.

The only thing this shows is your racism. The white boy must be innocent, the dirty immigrant must be guilty.

Actually for you anyone you don't like has to be guilty.

In many of these cases the male is a minority or an immigrant.
 
Actually for you anyone you don't like has to be guilty.

In many of these cases the male is a minority or an immigrant.

We weren't talking about many cases. We were talking about Paul Nungesser, who raped Emma Sulkowicz, a woman of color. (She's of Japanese, Chinese, and Jewish ancestry). The police refused to do anything about it. The University refused to do anything about it. She did a protest of carrying around the mattress she was raped on with her.

Instead of slinking back into a hole, Nungesser sued the University for his hurt feelings. And despite losing in court, the University paid him go-away money anyway.
 
I never said that, and I always thought it was a stupid thing to say.

Want to hear a bit of liberal heresy? I think that Anita Hill was a lying sack of shit.

Not that Uncle Thomas is justified. He's completely unqualified to be on SCOTUS and kind of an idiot. But nothing in her story made sense.

She worked for Thomas at the Department of Education, and when he transferred to mismanage EEOC, she went with him. This makes no sense. If he was a creep at Dept. of Ed, why would you follow him to a new department for no increase in pay? Frankly, I've had more asshole bosses than good ones. I would never go work for one of the assholes again.

Still, none of that justified victim blaming.
 
We weren't talking about many cases. We were talking about Paul Nungesser, who raped Emma Sulkowicz, a woman of color. (She's of Japanese, Chinese, and Jewish ancestry). The police refused to do anything about it. The University refused to do anything about it. She did a protest of carrying around the mattress she was raped on with her.

Instead of slinking back into a hole, Nungesser sued the University for his hurt feelings. And despite losing in court, the University paid him go-away money anyway.

He did not rape her. Stop lying.
 
Of course you would, but you also believe people should be unarmed and helpless so your beliefs don't mean jack shit.
Gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy.

1764111961105.webp
 
15th post
None of that justifies a lack of common sense. Don't travel alone, drunk out of your mind, at 2 AM in the morning.
You have no evidence she was even drunk. It appears you are looking for excuses to blame the victim.

Gotta say, thats pretty bad. What other excuses will you make up? Man beats his wife because she was mouthy with him? Guess it was her fault, she shouldn't have been mouthy.
 
You have no evidence she was even drunk. It appears you are looking for excuses to blame the victim.

Gotta say, thats pretty bad. What other excuses will you make up? Man beats his wife because she was mouthy with him? Guess it was her fault, she shouldn't have been mouthy.

You have no evidence she wasn't drunk. She was just wandering out looking for a cab at 2 AM.

The point was, the DA looked at the evidence, the testimony, and realized that the best he could get was lesser plea because he didn't want to take this shit in front of a jury.
 
You have no evidence she wasn't drunk. She was just wandering out looking for a cab at 2 AM.

We know she was doing. She was out with friends. So, her looking for a cab was completely normal. No evidence she was drunk.

If you knew she was stone sober, would that make a difference to you?


The point was, the DA looked at the evidence, the testimony, and realized that the best he could get was lesser plea because he didn't want to take this shit in front of a jury.

Sure and he gets off after assaulting someone. I dont see why thats, in any way, her fault.
 
We know she was doing. She was out with friends. So, her looking for a cab was completely normal. No evidence she was drunk.

If you knew she was stone sober, would that make a difference to you?

If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.

(Actually, all my Aunts are dead now, but never mind.)

Here's the thing, you are speculating as much as I am. Career prosecutors looked at this case, and figured that it wasn't one they wanted to go to trial on, given that getting the guy to just plead to the lesser offense was enough to get him deported and make him someone else's problem.
 
Back
Top Bottom