Retraction request to Bioscience: FOIA emails document another harsh criticism of Amstrup’s 2007 polar bear model
Michael Mann and a gang of climate crusaders just published a slanderous paper deriding 'denier blogs'.
Crockford was singled out to send a warning to any scientist that might break with climate consensus.
She is fighting back by producing evidence for her position and demanding the paper be retracted.
She has been vocal on the weaknesses of the evidence provided to put Polar Bears on the threatened list. Interestingly enough, a tranche of emails obtained by someone else shows that many of scientists in the main working group for polar bears expressed the same concerns and were not pleased that incomplete and misleading materials were put forward leading to the wrong conclusion.
This latest paper with Mann as an author is emblematic of the problems of climate science. Poor peer review, advocacy rather than science, bullying of alternate views, etc.
Michael Mann and a gang of climate crusaders just published a slanderous paper deriding 'denier blogs'.
Crockford was singled out to send a warning to any scientist that might break with climate consensus.
She is fighting back by producing evidence for her position and demanding the paper be retracted.
She has been vocal on the weaknesses of the evidence provided to put Polar Bears on the threatened list. Interestingly enough, a tranche of emails obtained by someone else shows that many of scientists in the main working group for polar bears expressed the same concerns and were not pleased that incomplete and misleading materials were put forward leading to the wrong conclusion.
This latest paper with Mann as an author is emblematic of the problems of climate science. Poor peer review, advocacy rather than science, bullying of alternate views, etc.