Criticism of Holder Dominates Hearing on Loretta Lynch, Attorney General’s Possible Successor

[PGreen]

WASHINGTON — Again and again, Senate Republicans made one thing clear Wednesday: They would not vote to confirm Eric H. Holder Jr. as attorney general. They were less passionate, however, about the person they were considering to replace him, Loretta E. Lynch.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...neral-congress-confirmation-hearing.html?_r=0

Is she really qualified and competent? It's a shame she will be working for President Obama and believes that illegal immigrants have a "right" to work. That is obviously controversial and will hardly unite Americans.

 

[jwoodie]

They should confirm her anyway. Otherwise, Obama will be able to shift attention back on them as being obstructionist (and racist, of course). We have no choice but to hold our noses for the next two years and try to undo the damage in 2016.

 

[bitterlyclingin]

Drive a wooden cross shaped stake through the heart of this lawless presidency by refusing to confirm this nominee, forcing Obama to nominate someone as AG who will adhere to the rule of law and the Constitution. Any Republican who votes to confirm this Eric Holder clone, Barack Obama tool, should be considered a traitor. Time to toss PC aside and stand up for America before Obama destroys the country.

 

[hazlnut]

WASHINGTON — Again and again, Senate Republicans made one thing clear Wednesday: They would not vote to confirm Eric H. Holder Jr. as attorney general. They were less passionate, however, about the person they were considering to replace him, Loretta E. Lynch.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...neral-congress-confirmation-hearing.html?_r=0

Is she really qualified and competent? It's a shame she will be working for President Obama and believes that illegal immigrants have a "right" to work. That is obviously controversial and will hardly unite Americans.

Grandstanding in the Congress... Oh my!

 

[Kosh]

WASHINGTON — Again and again, Senate Republicans made one thing clear Wednesday: They would not vote to confirm Eric H. Holder Jr. as attorney general. They were less passionate, however, about the person they were considering to replace him, Loretta E. Lynch.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...neral-congress-confirmation-hearing.html?_r=0

Is she really qualified and competent? It's a shame she will be working for President Obama and believes that illegal immigrants have a "right" to work. That is obviously controversial and will hardly unite Americans.

Grandstanding in the Congress... Oh my!

The irony impaired racist/bigoted far left drone and their comments!

 

[jwoodie]

Drive a wooden cross shaped stake through the heart of this lawless presidency by refusing to confirm this nominee, forcing Obama to nominate someone as AG who will adhere to the rule of law and the Constitution. Any Republican who votes to confirm this Eric Holder clone, Barack Obama tool, should be considered a traitor. Time to toss PC aside and stand up for America before Obama destroys the country.

How would this force him to do anything? Holder can continue as AG, or Obama can just appoint a series of Acting AG's. Now is not the time to play into Obama's false narrative.