COVID-19’s Biological Politics

OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
Azar is on it, and under Trump’s watch, not China Joe’s watch:

15 Jan 2021. China’s Silence on Coronavirus Pandemic Left World ‘Flying Blind,’ Azar Says
’....One of the very first ways the U.S. government was notified of a novel virus in mainland China, was by people from Taiwan....The Chinese government’s explanation for the outbreak did not make sense....China has still, one year later, failed to provide the first generation viral isolates....Azar slammed the WHO for continuing to praise China.’
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
Putin has recently ordered mass vaccinations due to confidence in Sputnik 5:

13 Jan 2021 Putin Orders Mass Coronavirus Vaccination Next Week
’ “мы долзны переити от крупномасстабнои к массовои вактсинатсии Sputnik 5, вактсины “лучщих в мире.”

We need to move from large-scale to mass-vaccination, Sputnik 5 “the best in the world.” ‘
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
We’ve noted USMB fascists who lock a thread that deserves to stay open (Snake Meat: Source of Chinese Virus), and comments are overdue on the pathologies woven into this following report in today’s USA Today. True to the media’s overall IQ compromise, it’s a joke to see the term “in-depth” used in the URL:

18 Jan 2021 Where Did COVID-19 Come From?
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
The first glaring contradiction in the report is that a) ‘answers could stop such a calamity from happening again,’ and b) ‘delegation from 10 nations finally was allowed in the country to explore the origins of the virus.’

In the first place, early Chinese reports were obvious placations, with the typical lack of follow-up that we also seen with the ebola crisis. Secondly, it’s not China’s prerogative to “allow” anything. It does not have the right to hold a product of nature esoteric hostage under the extreme violence of its epidemiological worldwide movement. The virus is indeed Chinese, though it and its biology belongs to Nature and the rest of the world. The first-cause philosophy should have been open, democratic coverage of the search for its focus (Ru. Ochagovost’iu) In Nature.
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
In the report, Ghebreyesus says ‘This is important not just for COVID-19 but for the future of global health security and to manage emerging disease threats with pandemic potential.’ This asshole, Ghebreyesus, needs to be stripped of clothing and hung butt-naked by the thumbs in a mosquito-infested Yunnan jungle. He kowtows to the yellow communist bastards that now tell him it’s time to investigate.

We note the next thing the reader comes upon is a photo, a kind of still life, of the arrived delegation. Comparing this topsy-turvy still-life image, Deleuze from Cinema 2: The Time Image:

’In the old realism or on the model of the action-image, objects and settings already had a reality of their own, but it was a functional reality, strictly determined by the demands of the situation, even if these demands were as much poetic as dramatic (for instance, the emotional value of objects in Kazan). The situation was, then, directly extended into action and passion. After Obsession, however, something appears that continues to develop in Visconti: objects and settings [milieux] take on an autonomous, material reality which gives them an importance in themselves....Everything remains real in this neo-realism (whether it is film set or exteriors) but, between the reality of the setting and that of the action, it is no longer a motor extension which is established, but rather a dreamlike connection through the intermediary of the liberated sense organs.’
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
We sat up and took notice when coming across the photo (still-life) of Grand Central Station in the above report. Thus, what we’ve left out of Deleuze’s excerpt should be kept in, as now reproduced it in its entirety:

’In the old realism or on the model of the action-image, objects and settings already had a reality of their own, but it was a functional reality, strictly determined by the demands of the situation, even if these demands were as much poetic as dramatic (for instance, the emotional value of objects in Kazan). The situation was, then, directly extended into action and passion. After Obsession, however, something appears that continues to develop in Visconti: objects and settings [milieux] take on an autonomous, material reality which gives them an importance in themselves. It is therefore essential that not only the viewer but the protagonist invest the settings and the objects with their gaze, that they see and hear the things and the people, in order for action and passion to be born, erupting in a pre-existing daily life. Hence the arrival of the hero of Obsession, who takes a kind of visual possession of the inn, or, in Rocco and His Brothers, the arrival of the family who, with all their eyes and ears, try to take in the huge station and the unknown city; this will be a constant theme in Visconti’s work, this ‘inventory’ of a setting — its objects, furniture, tools, etc. So the situation is not extended directly into action: it is no longer sensory-motor, as in realism, but primarily optical and of sound, invested by the senses, before action takes shape in it, and uses or confronts its elements. Everything remains real in this neo-realism (whether it is film set or exteriors) but, between the reality of the setting and that of the action, it is no longer a motor extension which is established, but rather a dreamlike connection through the intermediary of the liberated sense organs. It is as if the action floats in the situation, rather than bringing it to a conclusion or strengthening it.’
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
The report next invokes the fish market with WHO’s Ryan stating what most people thought important one year ago, ’ “It is an absolute requirement that we understand that interface and what is driving that dynamic and what specific issues resulted in diseases breaking that barrier.” ‘

Another contradiction to what Ryan states is introduced via Chiu. We note that the symbolism introduced in this piece of USA Today propaganda is directed to focus the reader on a specific area, right after Ryan invokes the term ‘specific’: ‘.. “and probably originated more than 40 years ago,” said Dr. Charles Chiu, professor and expert in viral genomics at the University of California, San Francisco.’

We are told early on that the fish market has been scrubbed clean, and that specific things must be known. Though the deceptive irony is that the virus evolved from Chinese culinary promiscuity, so one does much better to understand the history of San Francisco when confronting such propaganda, because the virus has dealt an economic blow:

Chinese Exclusion Act
’....The act exempted merchants and restaurant owners could apply for merchant visas beginning in 1915 after this led to the rapid growth of Chinese restaurants in the 1910s and 1920s, as restaurant owners could leave and reenter along with family members from China.’

Thus, Chiu is evoked as a viral expert in specifically, San Francisco, as Ryan and Chiu play a becoming space-and-time game to set the stage for statements that follow.
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
In the report, to mystify the specifics of the time-and-place game set up by Ryan and Chiu, next comes Connor from Boston University: ‘....”There’s really not a clear tree where we have forensic evidence to point to exactly where it came from,” said John Connor, a virologist at Boston University who studies emerging diseases. “It looks like a bat-derived virus, and there’s a big question mark after that.”....How the virus traveled 1,200 miles from Yunnan to Wuhan remains unknown.’

And after a year’s time, it’s clear that there are few who have made an effort to find out C-19’s travel history from Yunnan. Unless it’s esoterica. We made a connection to the nasty Kunming Market on 10 Feb 2020:

Post # 370 Kunming, Yunnan, Animal Market

And in that city where the filthy animal market is located, we find sequences from Rhinolophus sinicus, but not from its important COVID-19-harboring ancestor-cousin, R. affinis, elucidated at the Toxicological Department of the Kunming Institute of Zoology. We were listening to these sequences as music on the sax thread:

Posts # 181-183, Evolution of the Saxophone
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
Actually, the Kunming sequences are from Chinese krait, the Rhinolophus sinicus ACE2 sequences are from Wuhan Institute of Virology itself.
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
Ryan, Chiu, and Connor are playing with their schmucks in the media limelight. On 13 Feb 2020 we posted the ACE2 sequence of a bat virus from Kunming, from a 2011-2012 study, and we know exactly where it came from:

post #404 Kunming Rhinolophus sinicus
’....a single location in Kunming, Yunnan, China....Ap 2011 - Sep 2012.’
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
Including Beijing, Shenyang, one Chinese worker of this multi-author study is from Eco Health Alliance, New York:

post #186
’....alpha-YN2018...confirmed that ACE2-usable SARS-CoVs were continuously circulating in Rhinolophus in Yunnan.’

For the most part, snakes have been ruled out, though a problematic arises due to the occurrence of Bungarus wanghaotingi subspecies only in Yunnan. Apparently, nothing is published on its genome, lest it be esoterica.
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
The distance mentioned in Ryan-Connor-Chiu report, above, is 1,200 miles, though the distance from the funky Kunming Market to Wuhan is only 802 miles.
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
Since 2013, strain MIV1 has been known to those including Eco Health Alliance.

Nov 2013 Wuhan, New York, U. of California @ Davis, Geelong, Australia, Shanghai and Singapore (RS 3367 = Rhinolophus sinicus)
’....WIV1....RS 3367....intermediate hosts may not be necessary. However, to date, no SL-Covs have been isolated from bats and no wild-type SL-CoV of bat origin has been shown to use ACE2.’

Oct 2020 Strain WIV1
’....SARS-CoV-2 was unable to cross-neutralize WIV1, that has not yet crossed the species barrier.’
 

Dalia

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
14,186
Reaction score
11,965
Points
2,295
Location
Lyon, France
Ryan, Chiu, and Connor are playing with their schmucks in the media limelight. On 13 Feb 2020 we posted the ACE2 sequence of a bat virus from Kunming, from a 2011-2012 study, and we know exactly where it came from:

post #404 Kunming Rhinolophus sinicus
’....a single location in Kunming, Yunnan, China....Ap 2011 - Sep 2012.’
We will never found out exactly where the covid came from at first that what they were saying in France too it came from a snake meal :p and since then it is Silence Radio :dunno:
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
Silence will not suffice. We have already shown that there is a genus of snake, which even the U.S. Army was working on its venom, which occurs only in Yunnan and nothing has been published on its genome. The Chinese krait we are referring to is Bungarus multicinctus subspecies wanghaotingi. Bungarus is used as medicine in China. These snakes eat bats. Where’s the information that excludes this subspecies from potential to be COVID-19 intermediate host?

Any citations for the French connection?
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
The sales scenario at the funky Kunming marke, or any other, would be enhanced if the potential buyer of the live B. m. wanghaotingi knew that it was rare.
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
The Chinese are much too thorough to not know the exact origins of C-19, precisely how its biology happens in nature. These two articles represent the problematic, as Azar has pointed out, the first info coming to the U.S. was from Taiwan, as the WHO and China privilege themselves to information that justifiably belongs to the entire world:

We Might Never Know the True Origin of the Novel Coronavirus
‘....The WHO negotiated the terms of the upcoming investigation with China over the summer, without revealing any of the conclusions to the public.’

Is China Hiding the Origin of COVID-19?
’....it also prevented Taiwan’s participation in the international response to contain the pandemic, both along the lines of the Chinese regime.’
 
OP
B

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
8,116
Reaction score
700
Points
140
One can easily imagine that from the Kunming Market in Yunnan, 800 miles from Wuhan, someone making that trip could be infected by the original strain though might not have symptoms, an efficient vector indeed. And perhaps there were two or more transmissions before C-19 arrived at Wuhan. On the other hand as we have shown, New York’s Eco Health Alliance was working along with the Chinese on these closely-related strains as early as 2013. Science and the media may have too hastily dismissed cold-blopoded animals as potential ‘hosts’ because the coronavirus genome harbors the capability to subsist on inanimate surfaces for up to 28 days, which cannot rule out the scales of snakes or pangolins.
 

Dalia

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
14,186
Reaction score
11,965
Points
2,295
Location
Lyon, France
Silence will not suffice. We have already shown that there is a genus of snake, which even the U.S. Army was working on its venom, which occurs only in Yunnan and nothing has been published on its genome. The Chinese krait we are referring to is Bungarus multicinctus subspecies wanghaotingi. Bungarus is used as medicine in China. These snakes eat bats. Where’s the information that excludes this subspecies from potential to be COVID-19 intermediate host?

Any citations for the French connection?
What do you mean ?
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top