Court upholds 'under God' in Pledge of Allegiance

If you didn't like the letter E would you not use it. If its American, and you claim to be American, then live like An American.

Well, since we said the pledge for 62 years without "under GOD" and have only been saying it for 56 years with "under GOD," I'd say that, based on those numbers, it's more "American" without "under GOD."

That makes as much sense as anything else...

Some around here are fond of saying we need to progress. Looks like 56 years ago we did. The courts say we still can. Some of you have God issues. Work them out without stepping on my Constitutional rights. Thanks.

I can't speak for others, but I can safely say that I have no "GOD issues." I have been nothing but respectful to people of faith, both in this thread and in my real life. To each his own, I say.

Now that that is out of the way, why do you feel your specific beliefs should be forced upon others? Others whose personal belief system may not be the same as yours? Do you not respect the rights of others to hold different beliefs?
 
Come back hjmick, to the present.

Oh I am very much living in the present. I am of the opinion that the phrase "under GOD" has served it's purpose. I am also of the opinion that it is past time to remove it from the Pledge.

And you moved here from what country?

Says the idiot claiming that parroting a pledge written by a socialist that originally made no mention of God is what makes one an American :rolleyes:
 
Well, since we said the pledge for 62 years without "under GOD" and have only been saying it for 56 years with "under GOD," I'd say that, based on those numbers, it's more "American" without "under GOD."

That makes as much sense as anything else...

Our founding fathers did not want "under god" in the pledge..

Where are all of our fundamentalists?

Perhaps they choose not to bother because the Founding Fathers had nothing to do with the Pledge?

Obama is a socialist and the devil. We know this because he doesn't say a pledge written by a socialist that made no mention of God when written.

Yeah, Right-Wingers aren't renowned for their intelligence.:eusa_shhh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprise no one pointed out the fact that this came from the 9th Circuit Court; a court that has been painted as a liberal-leaning court.
'The Ninth Circus, I believe the Right' oft calls it.
 
This should piss the so-called athiest off.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A federal appeals court in San Francisco upheld the use of the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance and "In God We Trust" on U.S. currency, rejecting arguments on Thursday that the phrases violate the separation of church and state.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel rejected two legal challenges by Sacramento atheist Michael Newdow, who claimed the references to God disrespect his religious beliefs.

"The Pledge is constitutional," Judge Carlos Bea wrote for the majority in the 2-1 ruling. "The Pledge of Allegiance serves to unite our vast nation through the proud recitation of some of the ideals upon which our Republic was founded."


The Facts



The pledge is a pledge to our nation.....

NOT to a god or religion.

I have no problem with reciting the pledge in schools but it should be the ORIGINAL PLEDGE with NO religous references.


Yes, the original secular pledge written by a Christian Socialist. That's what makes one a good, red-blooded, capitalist, freedom-loving American!

Wait... what?
 
I am sick of being under God.

For once I want to be on top.

Come on God, let's do existentialist sex.
 
I am sick of being under God.

For once I want to be on top.

Come on God, let's do existentialist sex.


I wonder whether an existentialist or a nihilist would end up on top.

Although I suppose the two aren't mutually exclusive.
 
There is a long standing ruling that no child will be forced to say the pledge who does not wish to do so. The vast majority of children prefer to do so. There are usually rules that those who do not recite the pledge will still know it for its historical significance and they will rise in respect to the pledge and flag as a measure of good manners. I would hope they are also being taught to show proper good manners when the anthems, pledges, flags, or whatever of other countries are recognized as well.

It won't be long that the 'under God' phrase will have been in the pledge longer than it was not in the pledge. But the pledge is not indoctrination. Millions and millions of kids have grown up to be liberals despite reciting the Pledge in school. Nor has any theocracy developed.

What amazes me is that it was the 9th Circuit Court that upheld the phrase. That is the most liberal court in the entire country.
 
☭proletarian☭;2088787 said:
Oh I am very much living in the present. I am of the opinion that the phrase "under GOD" has served it's purpose. I am also of the opinion that it is past time to remove it from the Pledge.

And you moved here from what country?

Says the idiot claiming that parroting a pledge written by a socialist that originally made no mention of God is what makes one an American :rolleyes:

No you misquoter, i said the pledge was made better when "under God" was added. And if your claiming to be American, you should uphold american values and quit running it down.
 
☭proletarian☭;2088801 said:
I am sick of being under God.

For once I want to be on top.

Come on God, let's do existentialist sex.


I wonder whether an existentialist or a nihilist would end up on top.

Although I suppose the two aren't mutually exclusive.

The nihilist wouldn't care and the existentialist would be all talk anyway.
 
I got to spread some rep or so I am told by the powers that are to be or not to be, but Mr. Di my freind, you are hot tonight.
 
Last edited:
If you didn't like the letter E would you not use it. If its American, and you claim to be American, then live like An American.

Well, since we said the pledge for 62 years without "under GOD" and have only been saying it for 56 years with "under GOD," I'd say that, based on those numbers, it's more "American" without "under GOD."

That makes as much sense as anything else...

Our founding fathers did not want "under god" in the pledge..

Where are all of our fundamentalists?

Our founding fathers didn't write the pledge dumbass, nor were they alive to give an opinion on it one way or the other.
 
Interesting posts.

How is that Atheists scream bloody murder over anything and everything religious because it imposes something horrendous on their civil rights and liberties, screws up their life, angers them, etc., ...

but they NEVER consider that trying on every level to eradicate religion altogether in this country imposes their will on the civil rights, liberties, etc. of people who do practice religion?

How does that square?

If you don't want to believe in God or go to church, fine. But don't try to destroy the ability of those who find comfort in believing in God and/or going to church.

Get a thicker skin. Consider this: no matter how much you do to force someone else to bend to your will, you will never be satisfied. There's always going to be something that people, the government, or whatever does or does not do that's going to be stuck in your craw to bitch about. No matter what you do it's never going to be enough because your search for this "perfect solution" will always elude you.
 
☭proletarian☭;2088787 said:
And you moved here from what country?

Says the idiot claiming that parroting a pledge written by a socialist that originally made no mention of God is what makes one an American :rolleyes:

No you misquoter, i said the pledge was made better when "under God" was added. And if your claiming to be American, you should uphold american values and quit running it down.

How so? Adding two words that mean vastly differant things to differant people?
 
This should piss the so-called athiest off.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A federal appeals court in San Francisco upheld the use of the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance and "In God We Trust" on U.S. currency, rejecting arguments on Thursday that the phrases violate the separation of church and state.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel rejected two legal challenges by Sacramento atheist Michael Newdow, who claimed the references to God disrespect his religious beliefs.

"The Pledge is constitutional," Judge Carlos Bea wrote for the majority in the 2-1 ruling. "The Pledge of Allegiance serves to unite our vast nation through the proud recitation of some of the ideals upon which our Republic was founded."


The Facts

ROFL... Yeah another Anti-Theist rant bites the dust.

Newdow truly is an idiot.
 
Interesting posts.

How is that Atheists scream bloody murder over anything and everything religious because it imposes something horrendous on their civil rights and liberties, screws up their life, angers them, etc., ...

but they NEVER consider that trying on every level to eradicate religion altogether in this country imposes their will on the civil rights, liberties, etc. of people who do practice religion?

How does that square?

If you don't want to believe in God or go to church, fine. But don't try to destroy the ability of those who find comfort in believing in God and/or going to church.

Get a thicker skin. Consider this: no matter how much you do to force someone else to bend to your will, you will never be satisfied. There's always going to be something that people, the government, or whatever does or does not do that's going to be stuck in your craw to bitch about. No matter what you do it's never going to be enough because your search for this "perfect solution" will always elude you.

Anti-theists do not care about your rights Granny... they're only concerned with themselves. Plain and simple...



But hey... that's evil for ya.
 
church-and-state-264x300.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top