Court of International Trade puts Trump tariffs on hold

[meaner gene]

Congress had the sole authority to make policy on tariffs until it ceded it to Dotard. It's past time to take it back.

Tariffs were no different than congresses war powers act. Which allowed the president to effective declare war, but only for 90 days, and under strict congressional oversight and control.

That's the sort of limited ceding that congress can do.

 

[yidnar]

LOL! When the SCOTUS slaps Trump down..then what?

You guys seem to forget..if you ever really thought about it..that we live in a country of laws..and many of them do not allow what Trump and you wish to do..or at least...not in the way you want to go about it.

Tariffs are a power delegated to Congress..as anyone can read. Whining that congress gave away those powers is fruitless....they have them just the same.
The President is not allowed to rule by fiat..he is not a King.

Deal with it~

fighting for better trade deals for the US does not make one a king commie .. thwarting and standing in the way of the POTUS making better trade deals is treason .. remember that Nancy ..

 

[yidnar]

Nope. He can't even do that. Because the courts determined that nothing in his tariffs met those conditions. He can't just simply move the tariffs anywhere. There must be an investigation proving that every nation on earth is using unfair trade practices against the United States. The courts might have just saved this country from an economic catastrophe.

there's more than one court in the US Commie !

 

[meaner gene]

fighting for better trade deals for the US does not make one a king commie .. thwarting and standing in the way of the POTUS making better trade deals is treason .. remember that Nancy ..

Tariffs are no different than treaties.

They president can negotiate them. But congress has to pass / approve them.

 

[TemplarKormac]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/08/politics/tariffs-trump-power-constitution-congress

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Judges block Trump's unilateral tariffs on most trading partners

A three-judge panel on Wednesday struck down President Donald Trump's unilateral tariffs, including 10% imposed on most U.S. trading partners, calling them "contrary to law."

www.yahoo.com

May 28 (UPI) -- A three-judge panel on Wednesday struck down President Donald Trump's unilateral tariffs, including 10% imposed on most U.S. trading partners, calling them "contrary to law."

Despite several lawsuits filed in different courts, this is the first time a federal court has blocked them.

I got two words for you...Elon Musk. And the judicial branch is an equal branch of government, according to the Constitution. You know, the one you want to abolish?

Trump is a criminal and convicted felon who has nothing but contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

If Trump were smart, he’d end his reckless, irresponsible, and failed tariff agenda, blaming it on the courts.

But Trump isn’t smart.

 

[excalibur]

One of the judges was appointed by Trump, gomer.

And?

Nice to see you not trying to hide your hate for America, and the successful deals already done by Trump, and the other nations coming to the table to make deals.

The CCP and you are happy. Coincidence? I think not.

 

[berg80]

Funny how MAGA are only strict constructionists when it goes their way and then absolutely destroy their pearls when it doesn't. Pretty soon they will probably be storming the SCOTUS knowing the Orange One will pardon them.

The ruling has less to do with the Constitution and more to do with trump's inappropriate invocation of emergency authority under the provisions of the IEEPA.

 

[meaner gene]

And?

Nice to see you not trying to hide your hate for America, and the successful deals already done by Trump, and the other nations coming to the table to make deals.

The CCP and you are happy. Coincidence? I think not.

The only deals Trump made were TACO deals.

 

[CosmicRocker]

the ruling prohibits presidential tariffs because Tariffs are only mentioned as Congressional purview in Article 1
^stupid morons
*
salient rebuttal > White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement that: “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency."

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/28/business/us-court-blocks-trumps-tariffs
But the Trump administration has not met that criteria for an emergency, the plaintiffs alleged. The lawsuit also alleges IEEPA doesn’t give the president the power to enact tariffs in the first place, and even if it was interpreted to, it “would be an unconstitutional delegation of Congress’s power to impose tariffs,” according to a statement.

The court concurred in its ruling that Trump lacked the authority to impose those tariffs even after declaring a national emergency.

“IEEPA does not authorize any of the worldwide, retaliatory, or trafficking tariff orders,” the panel of judges said in their order Wednesday. “The worldwide and retaliatory tariff orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The trafficking tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders.”

 

[Dekster]

The ruling has less to do with the Constitution and more to do with trump's inappropriate invocation of emergency authority under the provisions of the IEEPA.

Seems otherwise to me: "Regardless of whether the court views the President’s actions through the nondelegation doctrine, through the major questions doctrine, or simply with separation of powers in mind, any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional,” the opinion continued. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5322889-court-rules-trump-tariffs/

 

[CosmicRocker]

I voted Trump will ignore the ruling. By what authority does their ruling have over Presidential tariff ceded to POTUS by Congress? Thye said Trump hasn't the authority to use the emergency act. Sorry but what is a civil trade court doing by checking POTUS emergency powers? Just ignore it

 

[meaner gene]

I voted Trump will ignore the ruling. By what authority does their ruling have over Presidential tariff ceded to POTUS by Congres?

Congress can only cede power on a limited and specific basis.
Trumps misinterpretation made that limited ceding, to be unlimited.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I voted Trump will ignore the ruling. By what authority does their ruling have over Presidential tariff ceded to POTUS by Congres?

It doesn't.

Congress gave him multiple tools to use to conduct tariffs.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/08/politics/tariffs-trump-power-constitution-congress

 

[JoeB131]

Another court overstepping its authority, but the stock markets love it.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

Court says Trump doesn't have the authority to set tariffs​

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5322889-court-rules-trump-tariffs/

Court of International Trade blocks Trump’s tariffs in sweeping ruling​

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/28/business/us-court-blocks-trumps-tariffs

US court blocks Trump from imposing the bulk of his tariffs​

Mango Mussolini is probably thrilled that the court ruled this way.

Now he can back away from what his advisors and Billionaire owners have told him was a terrible idea and blame someone else.

 

[TemplarKormac]

https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1927930474460069946

 

[krichton]

Another court overstepping its authority, but the stock markets love it.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

Court says Trump doesn't have the authority to set tariffs​

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5322889-court-rules-trump-tariffs/

Court of International Trade blocks Trump’s tariffs in sweeping ruling​

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/28/business/us-court-blocks-trumps-tariffs

US court blocks Trump from imposing the bulk of his tariffs​

Are they the ones overstepping their authority, are they putting a check on a dangerously stupid old man from abusing his powers?

 

[CosmicRocker]

It doesn't.

Congress gave him multiple tools to use to conduct tariffs.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/08/politics/tariffs-trump-power-constitution-congress

yes, but emergency powers is being denied by the trade court? They are denying POTUS powers of tariff for the reason
once IEEPA is invoked they still find POTUS do be denied authority by use of tariffs
Maybe im reading that too broad. But their determination as a civil court could be valid and still not check POTUS power to tariff .It does throw a monkey wrench into negotiations.

 

[meaner gene]

yes, but emergency powers is being denied by the trade court? They are denying POTUS powers of tariff for the reason
once IEEPA is invoked they still find POTUS do be denied authority by use of tariffs
Maybe im reading that too broad. But their determination as a civil court could be valid and still not check POTUS power to tariff .It does throw a monkey wrench into negotiations.

Congress only gave Trump limited tariff authority.
Trump thinks by declaring an "emergency" that doesn't exist, would trigger emergency powers.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

The more democrats hate Elon Musk the more I admire the guy and want to help him.

These threads by WEF/Democrat shillbots and NPCs are badges of honor for Americans.

Elon Musk is an American legend.

Elon Musk