Court of International Trade puts Trump tariffs on hold

[TemplarKormac]

That's why I just want to rob him. Turn the tables, do to him what he tried to do to me. If I kill him it becomes national news, if I just rob him he's not going to the cops and neither am I, we both stay off the airwaves that way.

But why? That serves no other purpose but to deprive you of the self-respect the robber lost a long time ago?

 

[scruffy]

But why? That serves no other purpose but to deprive you of the self-respect the robber lost a long time ago?

It's a focused application of power. I become the cop and the judge, when the real things fail. This way the robber gets the negative reinforcement and the deterrent.

I wouldn't keep his money (if he had any), I'd give it to some needy person. If I kept it I'd probably lose some self respect as you say.

 

[toobfreak]

Ivana, Marla, or Melania Or Stormy?

Take your pick. They are all much better loving any day of the week than Jill Biden.

 

[Care4all]

Take your pick. They are all much better loving any day of the week than Jill Biden.


View attachment 1117322

Some day, I hope we get the full story of how this was let to happen, or happened...

It is scary for me because the hubby was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer, and he has gone through his radiation treatment....and the thought that it could come back, or come back without notice or without knowing....or even going without further testing like supposedly Biden did, past the age of 70 yrs... just seems wrong, foolish, and scary.... None of it really makes sense because we don't know the full inside, private story....at least not until President Biden is gone....

I'm fine with letting him die in peace...and not with all this gotcha frenzy in the media 24/7.

After he meets his maker in a year or so, I'd like to find out more in the medical aspect of his case and timing.

 

[Unkotare]

My advice (and I don't really think I'm qualified to give it) is to focus on your own family's stability.
...

Why don't you think you're qualified to give such advice?

 

[toobfreak]

I'm fine with letting him die in peace...and not with all this gotcha frenzy in the media 24/7.

I'm not. I'd be perfectly happy to see Biden dragged before a court and grilled, then sued and have all his property taken under forfeiture laws and his spending his final rest days in some two-bit nursing home with dead flies stuck to the wall.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Some day, I hope we get the full story of how this was let to happen, or happened.

We are getting the full story, in all of its ugly, pitiable, demonic, power-hungry fullness.

This is you attempting to run from the issue.

 

[Rigby5]

They can kick rocks, k? Article II powers give the president the authority to set foreign policy.
Immigration, trade, alliances, all that. Any other branch of government really has no Constitutional right to inhibit the president
in doing that.
Just no.

Absolutely wrong.

Foreign policy, immigration, and trade are ALL totally under Legislative authority according to the constitution.

The only constitutional authority of the Executive is that they have to implement and carry out what the Legislative has established.

{...
The U.S. Constitution parcels out foreign relations powers to both the executive and legislative branches. It grants some powers, like command of the military, exclusively to the president and others, like the regulation of foreign commerce, to Congress.
...}

{...
Section 8 grants Congress the responsibility to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”. It determines the way in which an immigrant can become a citizen of the U.S.
...}

{...
Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution vests the power to lay and collect tariffs with Congress. The Founding Fathers intended for legislative oversight on taxation, tariffs, and related financial matters, viewing tariffs as strategic levers to be used with caution and prudence.
...}

If you think presidents have any of these powers, it is because a lazy Congress has been writing legislation to slowly let presidents do more, over the decades. But the Constitution gives presidents no authority over these things at all, in any way.

 

[Rigby5]

I'm not. I'd be perfectly happy to see Biden dragged before a court and grilled, then sued and have all his property taken under forfeiture laws and his spending his final rest days in some two-bit nursing home with dead flies stuck to the wall.

That precedent would likely cause another civil war in the near future.
It is not a reasonable way to go.

 

[toobfreak]

That precedent would likely cause another civil war in the near future.
It is not a reasonable way to go.

Yeah, sure, sure, and that didn't stop the democrats from doing it because....?

Funny how while democrats look for the slightest excuse to team together and rally for any cause, republicans typically run from any reason, even a good one, to go after wrongdoers. And republicans are incapable of teaming up.

Mind you, there is every reason Joe should be impeached, vilified, attacked, interrogated, charged and convicted.

Guess that is why the GOP is always number two and forever getting their asses pounded.

 

[Rigby5]

Lol Congress gave the president the power.

He can safely ignore them.

Wrong.
Congress allowed some limited authority, mostly for national security and emergencies so that Congress would not have to convene over every little thing.
But congress has the constitutional authority to tell presidents what to do over almost everything.
About all presidents can do is conduct war strategies.

 

[Rigby5]

Yeah, sure, sure, and that didn't stop the democrats from doing it because....?

Funny how while democrats look for the slightest excuse to team together and rally for any cause, republicans typically run from any reason, even a good one, to go after wrongdoers. And republicans are incapable of teaming up.

Mind you, there is every reason Joe should be impeached, vilified, attacked, interrogated, charged and convicted.

Guess that is why the GOP is always number two and forever getting their asses pounded.

I agree the lawfare against Trump was illegal.
But that is no reason to do it again.
Two wrongs don't make a right.

 

[Rigby5]

Guess that is why the GOP is always number two and forever getting their asses pounded.

The reason people are skeptical of the GOP is that after Lincoln was assassinated, the Republicans went off script and became the mouthpiece of the wealthy elite.
They supported things like company towns and it took Teddy Roosevelt to change that with unions, labor laws, etc.

 

[The Duke]

The reason people are skeptical of the GOP is that after Lincoln was assassinated, the Republicans went off script and became the mouthpiece of the wealthy elite.
They supported things like company towns and it took Teddy Roosevelt to change that with unions, labor laws, etc.

Trump and Teddy are good presidents.

 

[toobfreak]

I agree the lawfare against Trump was illegal.
But that is no reason to do it again.
Two wrongs don't make a right.

Since when is it wrong to prosecute someone for treason and many other felony crimes?

Why are you so easily buying into this whole "vendetta" line of bullshit?

Why is it that no one ever goes after democrats for abusing law and power even if they do it 100 times, but let republicans just appear to do it once, and people like you are all up and over it?

Take Hunter Biden: anyone else doing what he did would be prosecuted for drug crimes, gun crimes, and sex crimes, but when they started, it was decried they were just going after Hunter as a "political vendetta,"

So they never did, all charges were dropped, something that was ONLY done BECAUSE he was "special" (the son of a US president).

 

[Rigby5]

well see about that ! though you are applauding the leftist judiciary trying to override the power of the POTUS elected by the people the SC will be ruling on this very very quickly in an emergency fast tracked appeal .. commie ! WE the people elected the POTUS to carry out what he ran on !

Since tariffs and immigration are not presidential powers, it would be foolish to vote for a presidential candidate over what he says on them.

 

[The Duke]

Since tariffs and immigration are not presidential powers, it would be foolish to vote for a presidential candidate over what he says on them.

Oh, you're very wrong about that.

 

[Rigby5]

Trump and Teddy are good presidents.

Trump's last term was good since he started no wars.
But I want presidents who do not cause problems, and this time Trump is causing all sorts of problems.
While I want manufacturing back to the US, you have to incentivize first, then only do tariffs if other countries are cheating somehow.
I actually like immigration because that is the way to beat China with economy of scale.
And skipping due process not only is illegal, but dangerous.

 

[Rigby5]

Since when is it wrong to prosecute someone for treason and many other felony crimes?

Why are you so easily buying into this whole "vendetta" line of bullshit?

Why is it that no one ever goes after democrats for abusing law and power even if they do it 100 times, but let republicans just appear to do it once, and people like you are all up and over it?

Take Hunter Biden: anyone else doing what he did would be prosecuted for drug crimes, gun crimes, and sex crimes, but when they started, it was decried they were just going after Hunter as a "political vendetta,"

So they never did, all charges were dropped, something that was ONLY done BECAUSE he was "special" (the son of a US president).

I disagree.
There is no legitimate way to even make drugs, guns, or sex to be crimes.
The only source of legal authority comes from those that laws protect.
Drug, gun, or sex laws protect no one.

That is not what Hunter should be prosecuted for.
What he did that harmed others, was delivering bribes that caused the 2014 Maidan Coup in the Ukraine, setting up the war between the Ukraine and Russia.
He did no work for Burisma Holdings, and that was just his cover story.
He caused the death of over 30k ethnic Russian natives of the Ukraine, when the Azov battalion started massacring people over their racist fascism.

 

[toobfreak]

There is no legitimate way to even make drugs, guns, or sex to be crimes.

That is idiotic. What, are you living in the twilight zone?

The only source of legal authority comes from those that laws protest.

That laws protest? WTF does that mean? You are an idiot.

Drug, gun, or sex laws protect no one.

Drug, gun and sex laws protect everyone.

That is not what Hunter should be prosecuted for.
What he did that harmed others, was delivering bribes that caused the 2014 Maidan Coup in the Ukraine, setting up the war between the Ukraine and Russia.
He did no work for Burisma Holdings, and that was just his cover story.
He caused the death of over 30k ethnic Russian natives of the Ukraine, when the Azov battalion started massacring people over their racist fascism.

He should be prosecuted for that too. The entire Biden family should be prosecuted as traitors.