WTH_Progs?
Diamond Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- 12,229
- 10,326
- 2,140
Antifa? Really? Who told you? Barny? Aunt Bee? Gomer? Goober? Otis?
There's video evidence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Antifa? Really? Who told you? Barny? Aunt Bee? Gomer? Goober? Otis?
Intelligence reports are not "mind reading".Democrats now are mind readers? They knew about the stop the steal rally, they new there would be angry people, But only those who planned the attack knew that they were inciting something stronger than a peaceful protest. Most of the people at the stop the steal had no intention of breaking the law or storming the capital.
All over the Capitol? And if the insurrectionists were just let in, why did they feel the need to be so thuggishly violent?
Where are the charges for INSURRECTION, Halfwit?
So the video taken on J6 (no matter who took it), exonerates all those that stormed the Capitol?
You charge the leaders with insurrection. Why do you think all of Trump's buddies are pleading the 5th????Why would they charge someone with insurrection, when they can convict them for multiple federal offences much more easily, and much more cheaply. You don't charge the troops with insurrection. They were following orders - illegal orders, but orders from above, just the same.
You charge the leaders with insurrection. Why do you think all of Trump's buddies are pleading the 5th????
No, stupid. If the guy was there, hired as a reporter, before the insurrection, he can't be charged for covering the event. But if he simply sold the footage after the fact, he can't claim he was a reporter, and he will be charged and convicted for trespassing, and other federal charges.
And your proof that Sullivan was paid to ONLY watch the Capitol?bodecea
Of course there was a rally. No one knew the Trump supporters were going to the Capital Buildings. That's what Sullivan was paid to watch. Not the damned rally.
Court documents reveal CNN, NBC paid Antifa activist John Sullivan $70K to film riots at Capitol BEFORE 1/6
Poor trumplet.....and I've intimidated you with my comments.......................again. :heeheeHey everyone, half a brain Bodecea knew there was going to be a rally on 1/6.
Good for you.
Your link isn't working.There's video evidence.
Pathetic deflection attempt. They were not charged with crimes against children. But we know why you have to defend those CNN perverts.....Bill O'Reilly.....Roger Ailes (the guy who was HEAD of FOX "news")
Hey dumbfuck, Sullivan was in a RESTRICTED area of the Capitol filming. As in he was NOT ALLOWED to be in that area. As well as encouraging rioting. So who let him in there? And no, there are no insurrection charges. Why not? Insurrection is in the federal code.Why would they charge someone with insurrection, when they can convict them for multiple federal offences much more easily, and much more cheaply. You don't charge the troops with insurrection. They were following orders - illegal orders, but orders from above, just the same.
You charge the leaders with insurrection. Why do you think all of Trump's buddies are pleading the 5th????
No, stupid. If the guy was there, hired as a reporter, before the insurrection, he can't be charged for covering the event. But if he simply sold the footage after the fact, he can't claim he was a reporter, and he will be charged and convicted for trespassing, and other federal charges.
Not really. It was well known before that there would be people protesting. They might have not known it would be a riot but they knew for an absolute certainty there would be a newsworthy event.JustAnotherNut
How the hell did CNN and NBC know there would be anything going on in 1/6??
Its a very good question???
Is your Google broken again?How many were violent?
No, it does not.It doesn't though it raises the issue of entrapment
by the Deep State....
(the action of entcing or luring someone into committing a crime not considered independently in order to secure a prosecution for that crime, or crimes).
It mostly shines a whole new light on the issue of Jan, 6th.
It verifies what people have claimed all along...that the left knew what was going to happen
and they not only stood back and let it go but they aided and abetted the riot at the Capitol so they could invent this narrative of Donald Trump directing the whole thing to regain his stolen presidency.
Not unlike the Russian collusion case invented, and then promoted against him, by the media and CIA, FBI, CNN, etc.
Is your Google broken again?
Nah, do your own book report.me a favor and show me a link showing how many rioted.
Intelligence reports are not "mind reading".
CNN and NBC also were tapped into the same reports that were given, but ignored, to Botox Nan Pelosi.
At least you are correct that most of the people there to listen to Donald Trump and register their
dissatisfaction with the way the election had been corrupted were not there to fight with cops
and take down barriers. The vast majority of the crowd there that day went home peacefully and
quietly.
Nancy Pelosi had nothing to do with security for January 6th. This is yet another attempt by foreign propanda outlets trying to deflect blame from Donald Trump for the violence of the insurrection.