Could we put the lies about Biden to bed now?

[Lesh]

So to be clear.

Neither Hunter Biden nor Burisma was under investigation when Joe Biden help get the corrupt prosecutor removed

There was no personal benefit other than doing the right thing

The EU,the G7, the IMF,the World Bank,the Ukrainian Parliament, and a group of REPUBLICAN Senators (notably Ron Johnson) supported removing Shokin

Oh...

This bears repeating

 

[Faun]

Again: Hunter Biden is a Cokehead kicked out of The Navy for Cocaine abuse, with no Job Skills flies on Air Force 2 with Biden and is given millions of dollars from China and Ukraine after he visits China and Ukraine with dear ole Daddy Quid Pro Joe on Air Force 2.

Joe Biden, John Kerry, and his son, Nancy Pelosi and her son and Mitt Romney will all be Subpoenaed in The Senate to testify why they were paid so much money to work for Burisma and why Joe Biden extorted The Ukraine to Fire the prosecutor investigating Soros and Burisma. Soros is a primary donor to Biden, Clinton and Obama.

So you got some explaining to do Quid Pro Joe.

A Cokehead kicked out of The Navy with no Jib Skills flies on Air Force 2 with Biden and is given millions of dollars from China and Ukraine after he visits China and Ukraine with dear ole Daddy Quid Pro Joe.

That doesn't prove corruption, lying ******* moron.

Yeah, but with a very marketable name.

Right, when you are selling government favors.

He sold no government favors, lying ******* moron.

Thanks for not responding to a word I said, Stumpy.

 

[Faun]

That doesn't prove corruption, lying ******* moron.

So, how do you explain how a man with absolutely nothing to offer but his influence is being paid so much?


There is absolutely no possible explanation for all that money going to him EXCEPT influence peddling.

You are simply too hyper-partisan to question it when a lefty is involved. If it were a republican, you would be on it like shit on stink.

He got the job because he was the son of the VP.

That is neither criminal nor evidence of a crime.

Influence peddling IS a crime, you idiot.

No, it's not. It would have been a crime had Joe provided services for Burisma as a government official but there is no evidence of that.

Since there was no active investigation into Burisma Holdings when Biden got Shokin fired, Biden did not provide any service to Burisma.

 

[Faun]

CIA Sources like the CIA plants in The Whitehouse and Ukraine Embassy?

LMAO.

Or maybe like the Obama hacks in the FBI and DOJ that tried to stage a COUP?

I quoted the relevant portion. I have more sources too. Its really easy to find.

The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal

FLIP.IT

Brett Kavanaugh Wrote That Hiding Evidence From Congress Is an Impeachable Offense
Law Professor Jonathan Turley, who was called before Congress this week by Republicans, argues that Donald Trump should not be impeached for using the courts to prevent Congress from obtaining …

What evidence to Trump hide from Congress?

You fn stupid shithead WHY do you think he told 6 of his ass kissers not to testify ??? Because he's innocent??

Yes, exactly. Why should he participate in his own lynching? You assholes just don't get it. You keep expecting us to pretend that was is going on in Congress is some kind of fair process.

Since he chose not to participate in it, why was he crying he was denied due process?

 

[bripat9643]

CIA Sources like the CIA plants in The Whitehouse and Ukraine Embassy?

LMAO.

Or maybe like the Obama hacks in the FBI and DOJ that tried to stage a COUP?

FLIP.IT

Brett Kavanaugh Wrote That Hiding Evidence From Congress Is an Impeachable Offense
Law Professor Jonathan Turley, who was called before Congress this week by Republicans, argues that Donald Trump should not be impeached for using the courts to prevent Congress from obtaining …

What evidence to Trump hide from Congress?

You fn stupid shithead WHY do you think he told 6 of his ass kissers not to testify ??? Because he's innocent??

Yes, exactly. Why should he participate in his own lynching? You assholes just don't get it. You keep expecting us to pretend that was is going on in Congress is some kind of fair process.

Since he chose not to participate in it, why was he crying he was denied due process?

You have the order of events backwards, dumbass. That's what I just explained to the other dumbass.

 

[the other mike]

Just watched ABC Sunday Morning....
Not a word about the release of the Horowitz report next week,
and not one single mention of Bernie Sanders. ( Biden/ Warren looks like the hand they're staying with)

And I'm sure this will be true across 95% of the propaganda spectrum.

 

[Faun]

FLIP.IT

Brett Kavanaugh Wrote That Hiding Evidence From Congress Is an Impeachable Offense
Law Professor Jonathan Turley, who was called before Congress this week by Republicans, argues that Donald Trump should not be impeached for using the courts to prevent Congress from obtaining …

What evidence to Trump hide from Congress?

You fn stupid shithead WHY do you think he told 6 of his ass kissers not to testify ??? Because he's innocent??

Yes, exactly. Why should he participate in his own lynching? You assholes just don't get it. You keep expecting to pretend that was is going on in Congress is some kind of fair process.

Why can't your lying AH trump prove his innocence? Why does he like you run like the traitor and coward you are?

The Constitution says you are innocent until proven guilty, you ******* dumb Stalinist asshole. Don't you even understand that basic principles of justice?

Presumption of innocence is a legal theory of our justice system. It does not extend to the legislative branch, ya lying ******* moron.

 

[bripat9643]

What evidence to Trump hide from Congress?

You fn stupid shithead WHY do you think he told 6 of his ass kissers not to testify ??? Because he's innocent??

Yes, exactly. Why should he participate in his own lynching? You assholes just don't get it. You keep expecting to pretend that was is going on in Congress is some kind of fair process.

Why can't your lying AH trump prove his innocence? Why does he like you run like the traitor and coward you are?

The Constitution says you are innocent until proven guilty, you ******* dumb Stalinist asshole. Don't you even understand that basic principles of justice?

Presumption of innocence is a legal theory of our justice system. It does not extend to the legislative branch, ya lying ******* moron.

All you've said is that you admit it's a Stalinist show trial.

 

[Faun]

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

The United States and other Western nations had for months called for the ousting of Mr. Shokin, who was widely criticized for turning a blind eye to corrupt practices and for defending the interests of a venal and entrenched elite. He was one of several political figures in Kiev whom reformers and Western diplomats saw as a worrying indicator of a return to past corrupt practices, two years after a revolution that was supposed to put a stop to self-dealing by those in power.

As the problems festered, Kiev drew increasingly sharp criticism from Western diplomats and leaders. In a visit in December, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. said corruption was eating Ukraine “like a cancer.” Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, which props up Ukraine financially, said last month that progress was so slow in fighting corruption that “it’s hard to see how the I.M.F.-supported program can continue.”
Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance
...................................................................................................................................................
Hunter Biden 'did not violate anything,' former Ukrainian prosecutor says
Hunter Biden 'did not violate anything,' former Ukrainian prosecutor says

A former Ukrainian prosecutor who investigated a gas company tied to Hunter Biden said Thursday that there was no evidence the former vice president's son engaged in illegal activity.

"From the perspective of Ukrainian legislation, he did not violate anything,” Yuriy Lutsenko told The Washington Post.
....................................................................................................................................................
Debunking 4 Viral Rumors About the Bidens and Ukraine

At the time of his board appointment, the younger Mr. Biden had just been discharged from the Navy Reserve for drug use. He had no apparent experience in Ukraine or natural gas. And while accepting the board position was legal, it reportedly raised some eyebrows in the Obama administration. The Burisma board position was lucrative: Mr. Biden received payments that reached up to $50,000 per month.

A year later, Viktor Shokin became Ukraine’s prosecutor general, a job similar to the attorney general in the United States. He vowed to keep investigating Burisma amid an international push to root out corruption in Ukraine.

But the investigation went dormant under Mr. Shokin. In the fall of 2015, Joe Biden joined the chorus of Western officials calling for Mr. Shokin’s ouster. The next March, Mr. Shokin was fired. A subsequent prosecutor cleared Mr. Zlochevsky.
Debunking 4 Viral Rumors About the Bidens and Ukraine
......................................................................................................................................
Is there any evidence Old Joe pushed to have Shokin removed because of his kid's involvement with Burisma? No. How could there be since Shokin was not investigating Burisma? A fact that contributed to Shokin's dismissal demanded by the EU and the IMF for NOT adequately investigating corruption in Ukraine.

All the facts in evidence point to Trump's demand that an announcement be made the Bidens were being investigated by Ukraine had nothing to do with a realistic expectation anything nefarious would be found. Rather, Ukraine's acquiescence to conduct an investigation was what Don wanted because he knew it was enough to smear Biden.

Trump's belief has been borne out. Even though no investigation was launched and no evidence of wrongdoing exists millions of gullible rubes have it in their easily manipulated heads Biden is guilty of something............based on unsubstantiated innuendo.

LOLOL

Now if you could only prove that was extortion.

 

[Faun]

You fn stupid shithead WHY do you think he told 6 of his ass kissers not to testify ??? Because he's innocent??

Yes, exactly. Why should he participate in his own lynching? You assholes just don't get it. You keep expecting to pretend that was is going on in Congress is some kind of fair process.

Why can't your lying AH trump prove his innocence? Why does he like you run like the traitor and coward you are?

The Constitution says you are innocent until proven guilty, you ******* dumb Stalinist asshole. Don't you even understand that basic principles of justice?

Presumption of innocence is a legal theory of our justice system. It does not extend to the legislative branch, ya lying ******* moron.

All you've said is that you admit it's a Stalinist show trial.

LOLOL

No, lying ******* moron. That may be what your deformed brain translated my words into, but that is not what I said.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, exactly. Why should he participate in his own lynching? You assholes just don't get it. You keep expecting to pretend that was is going on in Congress is some kind of fair process.

Why can't your lying AH trump prove his innocence? Why does he like you run like the traitor and coward you are?

The Constitution says you are innocent until proven guilty, you ******* dumb Stalinist asshole. Don't you even understand that basic principles of justice?

Presumption of innocence is a legal theory of our justice system. It does not extend to the legislative branch, ya lying ******* moron.

All you've said is that you admit it's a Stalinist show trial.

LOLOL

No, lying ******* moron. That may be what your deformed brain translated my words into, but that is not what I said.

Sure it is. You admit they are not required to follow due process. That's the definition of a show trial.

 

[Faun]

Everyone called as a witness was present during relevant portions in Ukraine at the time of the events. They're fact witnesses.

None of them listened in on the phone call, moron, nor did they participate in any events related to the phone call. They are all just resentful petulant children who got their nose out of joint because Trump ignored their useless advice.

Isn't it fun when you call me a moron but don't know what you're talking about? Alexander Vindman was in on the call.

Did he contradict anything in the transcript?

Yes, he did actually. Did you not pay attention to the testimony? It's getting really annoying having to bring you up to speed on the matter all the while you keep calling me names.

Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

LOLOL

Lying ******* moron, what you're referring to as a transcript; calls itself a memorandum, not a transcript, based on recollections and notes taken by those listening in on the call. That in itself supports Vindman's claims. And no one else has testified in agreement with Vindman because Trump is blocking them from testifying. Which actually leaves Vindman's testimony undisputed.

Ate you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

 

[Faun]

Why can't your lying AH trump prove his innocence? Why does he like you run like the traitor and coward you are?

The Constitution says you are innocent until proven guilty, you ******* dumb Stalinist asshole. Don't you even understand that basic principles of justice?

Presumption of innocence is a legal theory of our justice system. It does not extend to the legislative branch, ya lying ******* moron.

All you've said is that you admit it's a Stalinist show trial.

LOLOL

No, lying ******* moron. That may be what your deformed brain translated my words into, but that is not what I said.

Sure it is. You admit they are not required to follow due process. That's the definition of a show trial.

Lying ******* moron, we haven't even gotten to the trial yet.

Are you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

 

[bripat9643]

None of them listened in on the phone call, moron, nor did they participate in any events related to the phone call. They are all just resentful petulant children who got their nose out of joint because Trump ignored their useless advice.

Isn't it fun when you call me a moron but don't know what you're talking about? Alexander Vindman was in on the call.

Did he contradict anything in the transcript?

Yes, he did actually. Did you not pay attention to the testimony? It's getting really annoying having to bring you up to speed on the matter all the while you keep calling me names.

Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

LOLOL

Lying ******* moron, what you're referring to as a transcript; calls itself a memorandum, not a transcript, based on recollections and notes taken by those listening in on the call. That in itself supports Vindman's claims. And no one else has testified in agreement with Vindman because Trump is blocking them from testifying. Which actually leaves Vindman's testimony undisputed.

Ate you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

There were two CIA personal specifically assigned to the task, shit for brains. The transcript was made while the phone call was taking place. It wasn't produced after the fact from "recollections." The transcript is as close to verbatim as you can get without having a recording.

No one who was on the call supports Vindman's claim. He's a lying douchebag.

 

[colfax_m]

Isn't it fun when you call me a moron but don't know what you're talking about? Alexander Vindman was in on the call.

Did he contradict anything in the transcript?

Yes, he did actually. Did you not pay attention to the testimony? It's getting really annoying having to bring you up to speed on the matter all the while you keep calling me names.

Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

LOLOL

Lying ******* moron, what you're referring to as a transcript; calls itself a memorandum, not a transcript, based on recollections and notes taken by those listening in on the call. That in itself supports Vindman's claims. And no one else has testified in agreement with Vindman because Trump is blocking them from testifying. Which actually leaves Vindman's testimony undisputed.

Ate you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

There were two CIA personal specifically assigned to the task, shit for brains. The transcript was made while the phone call was taking place. It wasn't produced after the fact from "recollections." The transcript is as close to verbatim as you can get without having a recording.

No one who was on the call supports Vindman's claim. He's a lying douchebag.

It's not a transcript. You can call it that if you want, but it's not a transcript. It was written after the fact based on notes made during the conversation.

 

[bripat9643]

The Constitution says you are innocent until proven guilty, you ******* dumb Stalinist asshole. Don't you even understand that basic principles of justice?

Presumption of innocence is a legal theory of our justice system. It does not extend to the legislative branch, ya lying ******* moron.

All you've said is that you admit it's a Stalinist show trial.

LOLOL

No, lying ******* moron. That may be what your deformed brain translated my words into, but that is not what I said.

Sure it is. You admit they are not required to follow due process. That's the definition of a show trial.

Lying ******* moron, we haven't even gotten to the trial yet.

Are you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

Trials aren't the only place where due process is required, shit for brains.

 

[bripat9643]

Did he contradict anything in the transcript?

Yes, he did actually. Did you not pay attention to the testimony? It's getting really annoying having to bring you up to speed on the matter all the while you keep calling me names.

Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

LOLOL

Lying ******* moron, what you're referring to as a transcript; calls itself a memorandum, not a transcript, based on recollections and notes taken by those listening in on the call. That in itself supports Vindman's claims. And no one else has testified in agreement with Vindman because Trump is blocking them from testifying. Which actually leaves Vindman's testimony undisputed.

Ate you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

There were two CIA personal specifically assigned to the task, shit for brains. The transcript was made while the phone call was taking place. It wasn't produced after the fact from "recollections." The transcript is as close to verbatim as you can get without having a recording.

No one who was on the call supports Vindman's claim. He's a lying douchebag.

It's not a transcript. You can call it that if you want, but it's not a transcript. It was written after the fact based on notes made during the conversation.

It's called a "memorandum" only because the CIA doesn't want anyone to think it's verbatim. Not every cough, stutter or repeated word was recorded. That's the only difference. You TDS nutburgers are hinging on the word "memorandum" because you know you have nothing.

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, he did actually. Did you not pay attention to the testimony? It's getting really annoying having to bring you up to speed on the matter all the while you keep calling me names.

Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

LOLOL

Lying ******* moron, what you're referring to as a transcript; calls itself a memorandum, not a transcript, based on recollections and notes taken by those listening in on the call. That in itself supports Vindman's claims. And no one else has testified in agreement with Vindman because Trump is blocking them from testifying. Which actually leaves Vindman's testimony undisputed.

Ate you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

There were two CIA personal specifically assigned to the task, shit for brains. The transcript was made while the phone call was taking place. It wasn't produced after the fact from "recollections." The transcript is as close to verbatim as you can get without having a recording.

No one who was on the call supports Vindman's claim. He's a lying douchebag.

It's not a transcript. You can call it that if you want, but it's not a transcript. It was written after the fact based on notes made during the conversation.

It's called a "memorandum" only because the CIA doesn't want anyone to think it's verbatim. Not every cough, stutter or repeated word was recorded. That's the only difference. You TDS nutburgers are hinging on the word "memorandum" because you know you have nothing.

You're making shit up again.

 

[The Purge]

Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

LOLOL

Lying ******* moron, what you're referring to as a transcript; calls itself a memorandum, not a transcript, based on recollections and notes taken by those listening in on the call. That in itself supports Vindman's claims. And no one else has testified in agreement with Vindman because Trump is blocking them from testifying. Which actually leaves Vindman's testimony undisputed.

Ate you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

There were two CIA personal specifically assigned to the task, shit for brains. The transcript was made while the phone call was taking place. It wasn't produced after the fact from "recollections." The transcript is as close to verbatim as you can get without having a recording.

No one who was on the call supports Vindman's claim. He's a lying douchebag.

It's not a transcript. You can call it that if you want, but it's not a transcript. It was written after the fact based on notes made during the conversation.

It's called a "memorandum" only because the CIA doesn't want anyone to think it's verbatim. Not every cough, stutter or repeated word was recorded. That's the only difference. You TDS nutburgers are hinging on the word "memorandum" because you know you have nothing.

You're making shit up again.

I guess this is made up just for you!...Besides being a morpn, are you also a Jew hater and a muslim terrorist supporter?...Are you related to Omar?

Biden calls Sanders’ pitch to leverage Israel aid ‘bizarre’

Joe Biden said Saturday that it is “bizarre” for Bernie Sanders to propose withholding U.S. military aid from Israel if the government there doesn’t moderate its treatment of Palestinians.

The remarks highlight a nuanced but significant distinction between the Democratic presidential contenders. Biden and Sanders support a “two-state solution” for Israel and the Palestinians, and both men have criticized political leaders on each side of the long-standing conflict. But Biden’s take, offered during a question-and-answer session with Iowa voters, hewed a more traditional U.S. establishment line by reaffirming a financial commitment to Israel regardless of its actions toward Palestinians.

The former vice president, while casting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a “counterproductive” and “extreme right” leader and accused Palestinian leaders of “fomenting” the conflict and “baiting everyone who is Jewish,” while suggesting that some on the U.S. political left give the Palestinian Authority “a pass” when criticizing Israeli leadership.

“In terms of Bernie and others who talk about dealing with Zionism, I strongly support Israel as an independent Jewish state,” Biden said in rural northeastern Iowa. He added, “The idea that I’d withdraw military aid, as others have suggested, from Israel, is bizarre. I would not do that. It’s like saying to France, ‘Because you don’t agree with us, we’re going to kick you out of NATO.’” …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...

 

[colfax_m]

LOLOL

Lying ******* moron, what you're referring to as a transcript; calls itself a memorandum, not a transcript, based on recollections and notes taken by those listening in on the call. That in itself supports Vindman's claims. And no one else has testified in agreement with Vindman because Trump is blocking them from testifying. Which actually leaves Vindman's testimony undisputed.

Ate you ever not a lying ******* moron?

Ever???

There were two CIA personal specifically assigned to the task, shit for brains. The transcript was made while the phone call was taking place. It wasn't produced after the fact from "recollections." The transcript is as close to verbatim as you can get without having a recording.

No one who was on the call supports Vindman's claim. He's a lying douchebag.

It's not a transcript. You can call it that if you want, but it's not a transcript. It was written after the fact based on notes made during the conversation.

It's called a "memorandum" only because the CIA doesn't want anyone to think it's verbatim. Not every cough, stutter or repeated word was recorded. That's the only difference. You TDS nutburgers are hinging on the word "memorandum" because you know you have nothing.

You're making shit up again.

I guess this is made up just for you!...Besides being a morpn, are you also a Jew hater and a muslim terrorist supporter?...Are you related to Omar?

Biden calls Sanders’ pitch to leverage Israel aid ‘bizarre’

Joe Biden said Saturday that it is “bizarre” for Bernie Sanders to propose withholding U.S. military aid from Israel if the government there doesn’t moderate its treatment of Palestinians.

The remarks highlight a nuanced but significant distinction between the Democratic presidential contenders. Biden and Sanders support a “two-state solution” for Israel and the Palestinians, and both men have criticized political leaders on each side of the long-standing conflict. But Biden’s take, offered during a question-and-answer session with Iowa voters, hewed a more traditional U.S. establishment line by reaffirming a financial commitment to Israel regardless of its actions toward Palestinians.

The former vice president, while casting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a “counterproductive” and “extreme right” leader and accused Palestinian leaders of “fomenting” the conflict and “baiting everyone who is Jewish,” while suggesting that some on the U.S. political left give the Palestinian Authority “a pass” when criticizing Israeli leadership.

“In terms of Bernie and others who talk about dealing with Zionism, I strongly support Israel as an independent Jewish state,” Biden said in rural northeastern Iowa. He added, “The idea that I’d withdraw military aid, as others have suggested, from Israel, is bizarre. I would not do that. It’s like saying to France, ‘Because you don’t agree with us, we’re going to kick you out of NATO.’” …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...

What the hell is wrong with you?