AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 31,181
- 9,093
- 1,340
It's possible that he was just generally throwing money at Clinton Foundation thinking it will pay off one way or another if he is in their good graces, but to credibly connect that to a deal he had NO FINANCIAL INTEREST in, deal that had to be cleared by 8 government agencies is totally not credible
So your defense is that he didn't pay her for a specific deal, he just bought her. Wow, remind me not to use you as my lawyer. BTW, that's also what I'm arguing. He knew Hillary would come in handy, so he bought her. He was right, it paid off
You know it actually IS POSSIBLE that the deal got approved as not a serious security risk because those 8 Federal agencies ACTUALLY THOUGHT IT WASN'T. The fact that NO ONE to this day has deemed U1 as a security threat is just further proof that this whole hoopala isn't about security, this is about politics.
How could anyone have known selling 20% of US uranium to Russia was a bad thing? I mean sure, Monday morning quarterbacking. Sure, guy. No one saw it coming that was a bad idea at the time. Again, wow, I'd never use you as my defense attorney. I'd spend the rest of my life in jail even if the prosecution didn't speak.
And these are the same Russians that you're arguing it's no thang while you're melting down about the Russians and the election. You're unbelievable. I mean literally, no one could believe you
Point me to a single Republican today that is saying that Uranium One is a national security problem.
ONE.
When you can't, you KNOW you got pumped full of shit.
Even Clinton hating U1 conspiracy pushing conservative puntids call bullshit on the national security claims:
Unranium One Focus Corruption Not National Security | National Review
It is true that hyperbole about national security and treason is not helping people’s understanding of what this is about. Uranium One has never primarily been a national-security controversy.
You've been had dupe.
That would be a far better argument if I'd argued that the issue is that it is a national security issue.
There is a national security issue in that the uranium was highly enriched. But that isn't unique as there are other sources of enriched uranium. And I haven't argued that, you just made this up.
However, we need the uranium for our nuclear power plants and now will have to acquire more at probably less favorable terms. Uranium isn't like importing steel
For fucks sakes when are you going to start using your head?
DoS does not have a say in what is good or not good for American commercial interests when a PRIVATE CANADIAN COMPANY sells it's shares. The only thing Department Of State cleared was that this deal IS NOT A SECURITY THREAT.
You have now CONCEDED that there was no security threat, you therefore implicitly CONCEDED that Hillary's DoS made an APPROPRIATE determination on U1 deal..
Will you now do the INTELLECTUALLY HONEST thing, by stopping spreading bullshit about how Clinton was bribed by Russians so she would clear this deal?
Last edited: