Cory Booker: It Doesn’t Matter If Kavanaugh Is “Innocent Or Guilty”

[Doc1]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

check your history dumbass - appointments are blocked by both parties on a regular basis ... now stfu

LOL, ainchu jus all tough and shit. Can YOU prove any of his assertions? Nope you can't and this appt will not be "blocked".

 

[Theowl32]

If you notice, the press knows this is lost. So, now they are shifting our attention again to the tax thing which will then go back to their collusion bullshit.

 

[Borillar]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

OK
1. SC appointments are just political appointments and justices are politicians in robes.
Why else would repugs refuse to hold hearings on a qualified jurist nominated by a duly elected president? Because Obama -D nominated him. Why all the death wishes for Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor from the right? Because they aren't reich wing enough. Why all the rulings in favor of corporations over actual people? Because the very same corporations own them.

2. Supreme Court appointees have lifetime appointments. Yep. No term limits. They are there until the either retire or die. Doesn't matter if they still have their marbles or not. Just wheel them out there and let them make life altering decisions.

3. Put Kavanaugh on the bench and he will reliably rule the way the right wants. Yep, he'll put corporations ahead of people, polluters ahead of the environment, government intrusion over personal privacy. That's been the way he has ruled, that's the way he will continue to rule.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The Left have no interest in truth.

Time to call the vote.

 

[Doc1]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

OK
1. SC appointments are just political appointments and justices are politicians in robes.
Why else would repugs refuse to hold hearings on a qualified jurist nominated by a duly elected president? Because Obama -D nominated him. Why all the death wishes for Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor from the right? Because they aren't reich wing enough. Why all the rulings in favor of corporations over actual people? Because the very same corporations own them.

2. Supreme Court appointees have lifetime appointments. Yep. No term limits. They are there until the either retire or die. Doesn't matter if they still have their marbles or not. Just wheel them out there and let them make life altering decisions.

3. Put Kavanaugh on the bench and he will reliably rule the way the right wants. Yep, he'll put corporations ahead of people, polluters ahead of the environment, government intrusion over personal privacy. That's been the way he has ruled, that's the way he will continue to rule.

And Ginsberg, Sotomayor and Kagan won't....you're dismissed. The question was prove the aspersions you cast upon Kavanaugh.

 

[AZGAL]

f you notice, the press knows this is lost. So, now they are shifting our attention again to the tax thing which will then go back to their collusion bullshit.

That is why the failing New York Times used most of their front page to insult the Trump family today.

 

[Siete]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

check your history dumbass - appointments are blocked by both parties on a regular basis ... now stfu

LOL, ainchu jus all tough and shit. Can YOU prove any of his assertions? Nope you can't and this appt will not be "blocked".

the dems blocked 54 Bush judicial appointments .. in return the Republicans blocked 103 Obama judicial appointments getting even.

both parties block appointments hoping their party will gain power and get appointments approved - judges make rulings on abortion, gun control, immigration etc etc .. having your judge on your team is the goal

now, can you prove you're not a dumbass

 

[Borillar]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

OK
1. SC appointments are just political appointments and justices are politicians in robes.
Why else would repugs refuse to hold hearings on a qualified jurist nominated by a duly elected president? Because Obama -D nominated him. Why all the death wishes for Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor from the right? Because they aren't reich wing enough. Why all the rulings in favor of corporations over actual people? Because the very same corporations own them.

2. Supreme Court appointees have lifetime appointments. Yep. No term limits. They are there until the either retire or die. Doesn't matter if they still have their marbles or not. Just wheel them out there and let them make life altering decisions.

3. Put Kavanaugh on the bench and he will reliably rule the way the right wants. Yep, he'll put corporations ahead of people, polluters ahead of the environment, government intrusion over personal privacy. That's been the way he has ruled, that's the way he will continue to rule.

And Ginsberg, Sotomayor and Kagan won't....you're dismissed. The question was prove the aspersions you cast upon Kavanaugh.

You said "prove ANY of that". I did. I'm also just reacting to what I observed at the hearings with regards to Kavanaugh. I've seen enough drunks to recognize the signs.

 

[Doc1]

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

check your history dumbass - appointments are blocked by both parties on a regular basis ... now stfu

LOL, ainchu jus all tough and shit. Can YOU prove any of his assertions? Nope you can't and this appt will not be "blocked".

the dems blocked 54 Bush judicial appointments .. in return the Republicans blocked 103 Obama judicial appointments getting even.

both parties block appointments hoping their party will gain power and get appointments approved - judges make rulings on abortion, gun control, immigration etc etc .. having your judge on your team is the goal

now, can you prove you're not a dumbass

LOL, deflection and dancing won't work on me. PROVE Borillar's assertions dumbass. I'll invite you to show where I ever said appts don't get blocked, geeezus you are a stupid one. THIS appt won't be blocked.

 

[Doc1]

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

OK
1. SC appointments are just political appointments and justices are politicians in robes.
Why else would repugs refuse to hold hearings on a qualified jurist nominated by a duly elected president? Because Obama -D nominated him. Why all the death wishes for Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor from the right? Because they aren't reich wing enough. Why all the rulings in favor of corporations over actual people? Because the very same corporations own them.

2. Supreme Court appointees have lifetime appointments. Yep. No term limits. They are there until the either retire or die. Doesn't matter if they still have their marbles or not. Just wheel them out there and let them make life altering decisions.

3. Put Kavanaugh on the bench and he will reliably rule the way the right wants. Yep, he'll put corporations ahead of people, polluters ahead of the environment, government intrusion over personal privacy. That's been the way he has ruled, that's the way he will continue to rule.

And Ginsberg, Sotomayor and Kagan won't....you're dismissed. The question was prove the aspersions you cast upon Kavanaugh.

You said "prove ANY of that". I did. I'm also just reacting to what I observed at the hearings with regards to Kavanaugh. I've seen enough drunks to recognize the signs.

Prove ANY of you assertions about Kavanaugh, playing stupid won't work with me.

 

[jasonnfree]

f you notice, the press knows this is lost. So, now they are shifting our attention again to the tax thing which will then go back to their collusion bullshit.

That is why the failing New York Times used most of their front page to insult the Trump family today.

Trump lowered the bar on insulting and belittling people right from the start, so what goes around comes around. Too bad the family has to take a hit because trump's a pig with no dignity or class, but at least Melania got her citizenship and now the parents as well.

 

[AZGAL]

Senator Booker is a pig.

 

[Yarddog]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

So he's saying, if you raise enough questions about a candidate you dont like, you can get rid of him.
yeah... this is what their whole strategy has been, raise question after question, none of which can be cleared
before the next made up question comes out... creating a barrage of crap for the news cycle, in the hopes of fooling people who really dont pay attention..... and ultimately they hope it puts pressure on Repub senators if their constituents call them.

Nice job Democrats! pat yourselves on the back for your anti -American actions.... you all deserve to live in a 3rd world nation

 

[Yarddog]

Senator Booker is a pig.

he's just a creation of politics. I dont think hes a pig, but dishonest and self serving as the lot of them? yeah

 

[Weatherman2020]

Senator Booker is a pig.

he's just a creation of politics. I dont think hes a pig, but dishonest and self serving as the lot of them? yeah

Calling him a pig is an insult to pigs.

 

[Yarddog]

Senator Booker is a pig.

he's just a creation of politics. I dont think hes a pig, but dishonest and self serving as the lot of them? yeah

Calling him a pig is an insult to pigs.

That's why I dont call him a pig, and just a creation of politics. Your far more likely to contract a disease from the congress floor than the inside of a pig pen

 

[toobfreak]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

Not only isn't there any grounds, basis or evidence to call Kavanaugh an alcoholic in the present or the past, you obviously don't know what a real alcoholic looks like (the senate is full of them) there is even less reason to suggest he has "anger management issues" over a situation where he has been asked more questions and been treated worse and more unfairly than any SC nominee in history to where his family has been smeared and threatened, nor any grounds to suggest a problem with "impulse control," much less any rationale to show why a justice who likes to toss a few back or can be pushed to anger has a DAMN THING to do with his ability to adjudicate the law. So you can take those thoughts of yours and cram them where the sun doesn't shine.

Moreover, if the SC has become politicized, look no further than the likes of Ginsberg, Kagan, Sotomayor, and others. Ginsgerg has been VERY public where she stands on Trump and will NEVER decide a case involving him in his favor REGARDLESS of what the law says. Indeed, it is the likes of Thomas and others who have shown an adherence to THE LAW as it was written, as the Founder and writers intended rather than trying to reinterpret it for the grounds of societal / political change.

Indeed, the entire radicalization and politicization of our government hasn't come from the constitutional moderates who have tried to steer even the rule of law, it has come wholly from the ever-far Left-swinging radicals in high places trying to force us ever more into a position of socialization and big-government fascism of everything.

No evidence, huh? He likes beer, dammit. He showed a lot of the characteristics of a high functioning alcoholic during the hearing. Swilling water, deflecting questions, lying about his drinking, indignantly turning a question around on a senator asking him what he likes to drink - assuming that everyone else drinks and trying to normalize his behavior
.

I like beer. What, are you really serious? "Swilling water?" Deflecting questions? Indignation at being treated like a piece of dirt? 90% of the people in Washington deflect questions, son! I'd be more than indignant if I were treated like him. I found his rebuttal refreshingly HONEST and candid. And HUMAN. THAT'S YOUR PROOF? I suppose so considering the rest of your mind-numbing irrational rant. Women as chattel? Really? Get a grip on yourself, and for once, let it not be your penis, you might further starve your brain of oxygen.

 

[Borillar]

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

prove ANY of that tripe child.

OK
1. SC appointments are just political appointments and justices are politicians in robes.
Why else would repugs refuse to hold hearings on a qualified jurist nominated by a duly elected president? Because Obama -D nominated him. Why all the death wishes for Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor from the right? Because they aren't reich wing enough. Why all the rulings in favor of corporations over actual people? Because the very same corporations own them.

2. Supreme Court appointees have lifetime appointments. Yep. No term limits. They are there until the either retire or die. Doesn't matter if they still have their marbles or not. Just wheel them out there and let them make life altering decisions.

3. Put Kavanaugh on the bench and he will reliably rule the way the right wants. Yep, he'll put corporations ahead of people, polluters ahead of the environment, government intrusion over personal privacy. That's been the way he has ruled, that's the way he will continue to rule.

And Ginsberg, Sotomayor and Kagan won't....you're dismissed. The question was prove the aspersions you cast upon Kavanaugh.

You said "prove ANY of that". I did. I'm also just reacting to what I observed at the hearings with regards to Kavanaugh. I've seen enough drunks to recognize the signs.

Prove ANY of you assertions about Kavanaugh, playing stupid won't work with me.

Since when does the right require proof of anything? Lock her up! Remember?

 

[harmonica]

we know ''they'' don't like facts/truth
we see it on USMB

 

[Toro]

Cory Booker?

Never heard of him.